Association Between Global Overcoverage and Long-term Survivorship, Chondrolabral Junction Breakdown, and Reduced Joint Space Width: Minimum 8-Year Follow-up.

IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
American Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1177/03635465251317738
Jonathan S Lee, Stephen M Gillinov, Bilal S Siddiq, Kieran S Dowley, Michael C Dean, Nathan J Cherian, Christopher T Eberlin, Michael P Kucharik, Scott D Martin
{"title":"Association Between Global Overcoverage and Long-term Survivorship, Chondrolabral Junction Breakdown, and Reduced Joint Space Width: Minimum 8-Year Follow-up.","authors":"Jonathan S Lee, Stephen M Gillinov, Bilal S Siddiq, Kieran S Dowley, Michael C Dean, Nathan J Cherian, Christopher T Eberlin, Michael P Kucharik, Scott D Martin","doi":"10.1177/03635465251317738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although previous literature has established the association between femoroacetabular impingement and progressive hip osteoarthritis, there exists a paucity of studies investigating the effects of global acetabular overcoverage on chondral wear and long-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare baseline joint space width (JSW), intraoperative findings, long-term total hip arthroplasty (THA)-free survivorship, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), pain levels, and patient satisfaction in patients who underwent hip arthroscopy with global overcoverage (GO) to a matched-control (MC) cohort.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective analysis, the authors queried patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for acetabular labral tears secondary to femoroacetabular impingement. Patients with complete PROMs at a minimum 8-year follow-up, the presence of coxa profunda as indicated by an acetabular wall projecting medial to the ilioischial line, and a lateral center-edge angle >40° were matched 1:1 by sex, age, body mass index, Tönnis grade, and labral treatment to a MC cohort of patients who had normal acetabular coverage. Baseline radiographic and intraoperative findings were compared between cohorts. Collected outcomes include the modified Harris Hip Score, Nonarthritic Hip Score, Lower Extremity Functional Scale score, Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living, Hip Outcome Score-Sports Specific Subscale, 33-item International Hip Outcome Tool score, pain levels, patient satisfaction, and conversion to THA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 38 patients with GO were 1:1 matched to a MC cohort. The GO cohort had significantly decreased baseline JSW at 50° (<i>P</i> = .002) and greater chondrolabral junction breakdown (<i>P</i> = .037). The GO and MC cohorts achieved similar outcomes for all 6 PROMs, rates of conversion to THA, pain levels, and patient satisfaction. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated that the patients experienced a similar overall 18-year THA-free survival rate (GO: 71.1% vs MC: 84.2%; <i>P</i> = .101). To isolate the long-term effects of GO on hip arthroscopy outcomes, 6- to 18-year THA-free survivorship was examined, revealing that the GO cohort (-13.1%) experienced a significantly greater decrease compared with the MC cohort (-5.3%) (<i>P</i> = .008).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with GO had significantly lower baseline ipsilateral JSW at 50° and greater intraoperative severity of chondrolabral junction breakdown. Furthermore, the GO cohort experienced a significantly greater decrease in long-term THA-free survivorship 6 to 18 years after hip arthroscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"900-910"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251317738","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although previous literature has established the association between femoroacetabular impingement and progressive hip osteoarthritis, there exists a paucity of studies investigating the effects of global acetabular overcoverage on chondral wear and long-term outcomes.

Purpose: To compare baseline joint space width (JSW), intraoperative findings, long-term total hip arthroplasty (THA)-free survivorship, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), pain levels, and patient satisfaction in patients who underwent hip arthroscopy with global overcoverage (GO) to a matched-control (MC) cohort.

Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: In this retrospective analysis, the authors queried patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for acetabular labral tears secondary to femoroacetabular impingement. Patients with complete PROMs at a minimum 8-year follow-up, the presence of coxa profunda as indicated by an acetabular wall projecting medial to the ilioischial line, and a lateral center-edge angle >40° were matched 1:1 by sex, age, body mass index, Tönnis grade, and labral treatment to a MC cohort of patients who had normal acetabular coverage. Baseline radiographic and intraoperative findings were compared between cohorts. Collected outcomes include the modified Harris Hip Score, Nonarthritic Hip Score, Lower Extremity Functional Scale score, Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living, Hip Outcome Score-Sports Specific Subscale, 33-item International Hip Outcome Tool score, pain levels, patient satisfaction, and conversion to THA.

Results: In total, 38 patients with GO were 1:1 matched to a MC cohort. The GO cohort had significantly decreased baseline JSW at 50° (P = .002) and greater chondrolabral junction breakdown (P = .037). The GO and MC cohorts achieved similar outcomes for all 6 PROMs, rates of conversion to THA, pain levels, and patient satisfaction. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated that the patients experienced a similar overall 18-year THA-free survival rate (GO: 71.1% vs MC: 84.2%; P = .101). To isolate the long-term effects of GO on hip arthroscopy outcomes, 6- to 18-year THA-free survivorship was examined, revealing that the GO cohort (-13.1%) experienced a significantly greater decrease compared with the MC cohort (-5.3%) (P = .008).

Conclusion: Patients with GO had significantly lower baseline ipsilateral JSW at 50° and greater intraoperative severity of chondrolabral junction breakdown. Furthermore, the GO cohort experienced a significantly greater decrease in long-term THA-free survivorship 6 to 18 years after hip arthroscopy.

全球覆盖与长期生存、关节关节破裂和关节间隙宽度减小之间的关系:至少8年随访。
背景:虽然以前的文献已经建立了股髋臼撞击与进行性髋关节骨性关节炎之间的联系,但关于髋臼整体覆盖对软骨磨损和长期预后影响的研究很少。目的:比较基线关节间隙宽度(JSW)、术中发现、长期全髋关节置换术(THA)无生存期、患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)、疼痛水平和患者满意度,这些患者接受了全覆盖(GO)髋关节镜检查,与匹配对照(MC)队列进行比较。研究设计:队列研究;证据水平,3。方法:在这项回顾性分析中,作者询问了接受髋关节镜检查髋臼唇撕裂的患者,这些患者继发于股髋臼撞击。在至少8年的随访中,完全PROMs的患者,髋臼壁向髂坐骨线内侧突出表明髋深窝的存在,以及外侧中心边缘角bbb40°,按性别、年龄、体重指数、Tönnis分级和唇侧治疗与髋臼覆盖正常的MC队列患者1:1匹配。基线x线片和术中发现在队列之间进行比较。收集的结果包括改良Harris髋关节评分、非关节炎髋关节评分、下肢功能量表评分、髋关节结果评分-日常生活活动、髋关节结果评分-运动特定子量表、33项国际髋关节结果工具评分、疼痛水平、患者满意度和THA转换。结果:总共有38例GO患者与MC队列1:1匹配。GO组的基线JSW在50°时显著降低(P = 0.002),软骨关节连接处破坏程度更大(P = 0.037)。GO组和MC组在所有6例PROMs、THA转换率、疼痛程度和患者满意度方面均取得了相似的结果。Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示,患者的18年总体无tha生存率相似(GO: 71.1% vs MC: 84.2%;P = .101)。为了分离氧化石墨烯对髋关节镜结果的长期影响,研究人员检查了6至18年无tha生存率,结果显示氧化石墨烯组(-13.1%)比MC组(-5.3%)显著降低(P = 0.008)。结论:GO患者在50°处的基线同侧JSW明显较低,术中关节关节破裂的严重程度较高。此外,GO组在髋关节镜检查后6至18年的长期无tha生存率显著下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
425
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: An invaluable resource for the orthopaedic sports medicine community, _The American Journal of Sports Medicine_ is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, first published in 1972. It is the official publication of the [American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM)](http://www.sportsmed.org/)! The journal acts as an important forum for independent orthopaedic sports medicine research and education, allowing clinical practitioners the ability to make decisions based on sound scientific information. This journal is a must-read for: * Orthopaedic Surgeons and Specialists * Sports Medicine Physicians * Physiatrists * Athletic Trainers * Team Physicians * And Physical Therapists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信