Undergraduate Clinical Education Environment Measure (UCEEM) of a dental program in Jouf University and Qassim University: A bi-institutional study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Mohammed Ghazi Sghaireen, Humera Kanwal, Shahzad Ali Shah, Alzarea K Bader, Saud Hamdan Almaeen, Zafar Ali Khan, Rakhi Issrani, Namdeo Prabhu
{"title":"Undergraduate Clinical Education Environment Measure (UCEEM) of a dental program in Jouf University and Qassim University: A bi-institutional study.","authors":"Mohammed Ghazi Sghaireen, Humera Kanwal, Shahzad Ali Shah, Alzarea K Bader, Saud Hamdan Almaeen, Zafar Ali Khan, Rakhi Issrani, Namdeo Prabhu","doi":"10.1177/10519815241311753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThere has been a growing interest in defining the educational environment in medical and dental institutes that includes different measures to rate and improve it. Evidence suggests that the educational environment directly impacts teaching, learning, well-being, and students' involvement and their successful professional performance. The Undergraduate Clinical Education Environment Measure (UCEEM) is widely used in medical and allied health sciences institutions to evaluate students' perceptions of their clinical learning environment.ObjectivesThis study aimed to characterize and contrast how students in two Saudi Arabian dental institutes' bachelor's degree programs perceive their clinical learning environment, to assess how the academic year influences the student behavior and perception as well as find out the strengths and weaknesses of each of the five domains of the questionnaire used in this study.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional survey study that was conducted from 15<sup>th</sup> October 2023 till 15<sup>th</sup> December 2023. Students from two Saudi Arabian colleges - College of Dentistry, Jouf University, and College of Dentistry, Qassim University who met the selection criteria were included in the study using the convenience-sampling method. A 38-item modified UCEEM questionnaire, piloted and tested for reliability and internal consistency, consists of 38 items congregated into five overarching dimensions and was mailed to the third-, fourth- and fifth-year UG students and interns of College of Dentistry, Jouf University, and Qassim University. The modified version was developed through quantitative data from various core groups, comprehensive dialogues with students, and the clinical committees of both colleges. Mann Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed.ResultsThe survey achieved a response rate of 69.0%. Among the respondents, there were 85 (57.8%) males and 62 (42.2%) females, aged between 23 and 32 years. The mean total score for all students was 138.45. Notably, students from Qassim University gave significantly higher scores than the students of Jouf University (p = 0.01). Furthermore, students from Qassim University provided higher ratings for most of the overarching dimensions of experiential learning as compared to the students of Jouf University.ConclusionThe significant differences between universities highlight the need for tailored interventions to improve the quality of clinical education, particularly in areas related to supervision and experiential learning. We recommend implementing continuing education programs for supervisors to enhance their pedagogical competencies in overseeing students' clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":51373,"journal":{"name":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"2553-2562"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815241311753","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundThere has been a growing interest in defining the educational environment in medical and dental institutes that includes different measures to rate and improve it. Evidence suggests that the educational environment directly impacts teaching, learning, well-being, and students' involvement and their successful professional performance. The Undergraduate Clinical Education Environment Measure (UCEEM) is widely used in medical and allied health sciences institutions to evaluate students' perceptions of their clinical learning environment.ObjectivesThis study aimed to characterize and contrast how students in two Saudi Arabian dental institutes' bachelor's degree programs perceive their clinical learning environment, to assess how the academic year influences the student behavior and perception as well as find out the strengths and weaknesses of each of the five domains of the questionnaire used in this study.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional survey study that was conducted from 15th October 2023 till 15th December 2023. Students from two Saudi Arabian colleges - College of Dentistry, Jouf University, and College of Dentistry, Qassim University who met the selection criteria were included in the study using the convenience-sampling method. A 38-item modified UCEEM questionnaire, piloted and tested for reliability and internal consistency, consists of 38 items congregated into five overarching dimensions and was mailed to the third-, fourth- and fifth-year UG students and interns of College of Dentistry, Jouf University, and Qassim University. The modified version was developed through quantitative data from various core groups, comprehensive dialogues with students, and the clinical committees of both colleges. Mann Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed.ResultsThe survey achieved a response rate of 69.0%. Among the respondents, there were 85 (57.8%) males and 62 (42.2%) females, aged between 23 and 32 years. The mean total score for all students was 138.45. Notably, students from Qassim University gave significantly higher scores than the students of Jouf University (p = 0.01). Furthermore, students from Qassim University provided higher ratings for most of the overarching dimensions of experiential learning as compared to the students of Jouf University.ConclusionThe significant differences between universities highlight the need for tailored interventions to improve the quality of clinical education, particularly in areas related to supervision and experiential learning. We recommend implementing continuing education programs for supervisors to enhance their pedagogical competencies in overseeing students' clinical practice.

Jouf大学和卡西姆大学牙科专业本科临床教育环境测量(UCEEM):一项双机构研究。
背景:人们对界定医疗和牙科机构的教育环境越来越感兴趣,其中包括对其进行评级和改进的不同措施。有证据表明,教育环境直接影响教学、学习、幸福感、学生的参与和他们成功的专业表现。本科临床教育环境测量(UCEEM)被广泛应用于医学和相关健康科学机构,以评估学生对临床学习环境的看法。目的:本研究旨在描述和对比沙特阿拉伯两所牙科学院学士学位课程的学生如何感知他们的临床学习环境,评估学年如何影响学生的行为和感知,并找出本研究中使用的问卷中五个领域的优缺点。方法:这是一项横断面调查研究,于2023年10月15日至2023年12月15日进行。采用方便抽样法,将沙特阿拉伯两所学院(Jouf大学牙科学院和Qassim大学牙科学院)符合选择标准的学生纳入研究。一份包含38个项目的UCEEM改进问卷,对其可靠性和内部一致性进行了试点和测试,由38个项目组成,分为五个总体维度,并邮寄给了Jouf大学牙科学院和Qassim大学的UG三、四、五年级学生和实习生。修改后的版本是通过各种核心小组的定量数据、与学生的全面对话以及两所学院的临床委员会来制定的。进行Mann Whitney U和Kruskal-Wallis试验。结果:问卷回复率为69.0%。受访者中男性85人(57.8%),女性62人(42.2%),年龄在23 - 32岁之间。所有学生的平均总分为138.45分。值得注意的是,卡西姆大学学生的得分明显高于Jouf大学学生(p = 0.01)。此外,与Jouf大学的学生相比,卡西姆大学的学生在体验式学习的大多数总体维度上提供了更高的评分。结论:各大学之间的显著差异表明,需要有针对性的干预措施来提高临床教育的质量,特别是在与监督和体验式学习相关的领域。我们建议对主管实施继续教育计划,以提高他们监督学生临床实践的教学能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
30.40%
发文量
739
期刊介绍: WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation is an interdisciplinary, international journal which publishes high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts covering the entire scope of the occupation of work. The journal''s subtitle has been deliberately laid out: The first goal is the prevention of illness, injury, and disability. When this goal is not achievable, the attention focuses on assessment to design client-centered intervention, rehabilitation, treatment, or controls that use scientific evidence to support best practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信