Deanne August, Nicole Marsh, Stephanie Hall, Ruth Royle, Linda Cobbald, Pieter Koorts, Linda McLaughlin, Gillian Lack, Danika Iminof, Katie Foxcroft, Robert S Ware, Amanda Ullman
{"title":"Near-Infrared Informed Huddle for Neonatal Peripheral Intravenous Catheterization: A Pre-Post-Intervention Study.","authors":"Deanne August, Nicole Marsh, Stephanie Hall, Ruth Royle, Linda Cobbald, Pieter Koorts, Linda McLaughlin, Gillian Lack, Danika Iminof, Katie Foxcroft, Robert S Ware, Amanda Ullman","doi":"10.1097/JPN.0000000000000877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Implement and evaluate near-infrared (NIR) huddles for neonatal peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) insertion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An implementation project investigated PIVC insertion attempts, site, inserter designation, dwell, and complications during 3 phases (baseline, education, and implementation). Implementation consisted of planning insertion site(s) and attempt frequency with an NIR device huddle. The primary effectiveness outcome was first-time insertion success. Secondary outcomes included: PIVC completion/failure, failure reason, complications. Implementation outcomes were compliance, utility, and acceptability. The association between study phase and primary outcome was assessed using logistic regression. Exploratory analyses investigated intrinsic and extrinsic risks for PIVC insertion failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 5 months, data from 248 (33%) neonates with 771 admissions was collected. Fifty-nine (24%) neonates required multiple PIVCs; resulting in 370 cannulations (n = 94 baseline, n = 55 education, and n = 221 intervention phases). Median birthweight was 2909 grams (IQR 2033-3499), gestation was 37.3 weeks (IQR 33.9-38.9). Length of stay, weight, gestation, and previous PIVC events were similar across phases. Insertion success was lower during education (n = 15, 39.5%) than baseline (n = 29, 56.9%), but differences were not significant. Acceptability of huddle process was higher (mean = 7.5/10, SD 2.2) than NIR device (mean = 5.0/10, SD 3.7). First time insertion failure was higher for forearm compared to hand/wrist (OR 5.94; 95% CI 1.22-28.87).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The implementation of NIR-huddle failed to improve first-time insertion success, but PIVC dwell time and documentation were improved. Further research is needed to minimize harm and improve neonatal vascular access preservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":54773,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPN.0000000000000877","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Implement and evaluate near-infrared (NIR) huddles for neonatal peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) insertion.
Methods: An implementation project investigated PIVC insertion attempts, site, inserter designation, dwell, and complications during 3 phases (baseline, education, and implementation). Implementation consisted of planning insertion site(s) and attempt frequency with an NIR device huddle. The primary effectiveness outcome was first-time insertion success. Secondary outcomes included: PIVC completion/failure, failure reason, complications. Implementation outcomes were compliance, utility, and acceptability. The association between study phase and primary outcome was assessed using logistic regression. Exploratory analyses investigated intrinsic and extrinsic risks for PIVC insertion failure.
Results: Over 5 months, data from 248 (33%) neonates with 771 admissions was collected. Fifty-nine (24%) neonates required multiple PIVCs; resulting in 370 cannulations (n = 94 baseline, n = 55 education, and n = 221 intervention phases). Median birthweight was 2909 grams (IQR 2033-3499), gestation was 37.3 weeks (IQR 33.9-38.9). Length of stay, weight, gestation, and previous PIVC events were similar across phases. Insertion success was lower during education (n = 15, 39.5%) than baseline (n = 29, 56.9%), but differences were not significant. Acceptability of huddle process was higher (mean = 7.5/10, SD 2.2) than NIR device (mean = 5.0/10, SD 3.7). First time insertion failure was higher for forearm compared to hand/wrist (OR 5.94; 95% CI 1.22-28.87).
Conclusion: The implementation of NIR-huddle failed to improve first-time insertion success, but PIVC dwell time and documentation were improved. Further research is needed to minimize harm and improve neonatal vascular access preservation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing (JPNN) strives to advance the practice of evidence-based perinatal and neonatal nursing through peer-reviewed articles in a topic-oriented format. Each issue features scholarly manuscripts, continuing education options, and columns on expert opinions, legal and risk management, and education resources. The perinatal focus of JPNN centers around labor and delivery and intrapartum services specifically and overall perinatal services broadly. The neonatal focus emphasizes neonatal intensive care and includes the spectrum of neonatal and infant care outcomes. Featured articles for JPNN include evidence-based reviews, innovative clinical programs and projects, clinical updates and education and research-related articles appropriate for registered and advanced practice nurses.
The primary objective of The Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing is to provide practicing nurses with useful information on perinatal and neonatal nursing. Each issue is PEER REVIEWED and will feature one topic, to be covered in depth. JPNN is a refereed journal. All manuscripts submitted for publication are peer reviewed by a minimum of three members of the editorial board. Manuscripts are evaluated on the basis of accuracy and relevance of content, fit with the journal purpose and upcoming issue topics, and writing style. Both clinical and research manuscripts applicable to perinatal and neonatal care are welcomed.