Number of physiotherapy sessions in work-related absenteeism due to musculoskeletal disorders, by gender, age and occupation: A retrospective cohort study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Mònica Rodríguez-Bagó, Elena Ronda-Pérez, Emili Molina-Vega, Maite Sampere-Valero, José-Miguel Martínez-Martínez
{"title":"Number of physiotherapy sessions in work-related absenteeism due to musculoskeletal disorders, by gender, age and occupation: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Mònica Rodríguez-Bagó, Elena Ronda-Pérez, Emili Molina-Vega, Maite Sampere-Valero, José-Miguel Martínez-Martínez","doi":"10.1177/10519815241308252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe number of physiotherapy sessions needed to treat musculoskeletal conditions varies in the literature; age and gender may partly explain the discordant reports. However, no research has analysed whether occupation may influence this outcome in the working population.ObjectivesTo assess the number of physiotherapy sessions performed for low back pain (LBP), cervicalgia (CG), and whiplash syndrome (WS) in workers on sickness absence, according to gender, age, and occupation.MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, the outcome variable was the number of physiotherapy sessions needed to recover from LBP, CG, and WS. Explanatory variables were sex, age, occupation, year when physiotherapy ended, and treatment centre. The adjusted median differences in the number of sessions (MDa) were calculated.ResultsOlder workers (55-65 years) needed a median of 2.6 additional sessions for LBP, 3.0 more sessions for CG, and 3.6 for WS. Men underwent fewer sessions than women (LBP and CG: MDa -0.9 sessions; WS: MDa -1.7 sessions). Compared to crafts and related trades workers, plant and machine operators and assemblers required more sessions to recover from LBP (MDa 0.7), as did service and sales workers (MDa 0.7). In CG and WS, differences were observed for technicians and associate professionals (MDa 1.3 and MDa 1.7, respectively), and for professionals (MDa 2.4 and MDa 1.6). Clerical support workers also needed significantly more sessions for CG.ConclusionsThe number of sessions required to recover from LBP, CG, and WS in workers on work-related sickness absence is different according to gender, age, and occupation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51373,"journal":{"name":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"2294-2302"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815241308252","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundThe number of physiotherapy sessions needed to treat musculoskeletal conditions varies in the literature; age and gender may partly explain the discordant reports. However, no research has analysed whether occupation may influence this outcome in the working population.ObjectivesTo assess the number of physiotherapy sessions performed for low back pain (LBP), cervicalgia (CG), and whiplash syndrome (WS) in workers on sickness absence, according to gender, age, and occupation.MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, the outcome variable was the number of physiotherapy sessions needed to recover from LBP, CG, and WS. Explanatory variables were sex, age, occupation, year when physiotherapy ended, and treatment centre. The adjusted median differences in the number of sessions (MDa) were calculated.ResultsOlder workers (55-65 years) needed a median of 2.6 additional sessions for LBP, 3.0 more sessions for CG, and 3.6 for WS. Men underwent fewer sessions than women (LBP and CG: MDa -0.9 sessions; WS: MDa -1.7 sessions). Compared to crafts and related trades workers, plant and machine operators and assemblers required more sessions to recover from LBP (MDa 0.7), as did service and sales workers (MDa 0.7). In CG and WS, differences were observed for technicians and associate professionals (MDa 1.3 and MDa 1.7, respectively), and for professionals (MDa 2.4 and MDa 1.6). Clerical support workers also needed significantly more sessions for CG.ConclusionsThe number of sessions required to recover from LBP, CG, and WS in workers on work-related sickness absence is different according to gender, age, and occupation.

因肌肉骨骼疾病而缺勤的物理治疗次数,按性别、年龄和职业分列。回顾性队列研究。
背景:文献中治疗肌肉骨骼疾病所需的物理治疗疗程数量各不相同;年龄和性别可能在一定程度上解释了不一致的报告。然而,没有研究分析职业是否会影响工作人口的这一结果。目的:根据性别、年龄和职业,评估病假工人对腰痛(LBP)、颈痛(CG)和鞭打综合征(WS)进行物理治疗的次数。方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,结果变量为腰痛、CG和WS恢复所需的物理治疗次数。解释变量为性别、年龄、职业、物理治疗结束年份和治疗中心。计算治疗次数(MDa)的调整中位数差异。结果:老年工作者(55-65岁)腰痛需要额外2.6次治疗,CG需要额外3.0次治疗,WS需要额外3.6次治疗。男性接受治疗的次数少于女性(LBP和CG: MDa -0.9次;WS: MDa -1.7次)。与工艺和相关行业工人相比,工厂和机器操作员和装配工需要更多的时间才能从LBP (MDa 0.7)中恢复过来,服务和销售人员也是如此(MDa 0.7)。在CG和WS方面,技术人员和副专业人员(分别为MDa 1.3和MDa 1.7)和专业人员(MDa 2.4和MDa 1.6)观察到差异。文书支持人员也需要更多的CG课程。结论:因工缺勤的工人从LBP、CG和WS中恢复所需的时间因性别、年龄和职业的不同而不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
30.40%
发文量
739
期刊介绍: WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation is an interdisciplinary, international journal which publishes high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts covering the entire scope of the occupation of work. The journal''s subtitle has been deliberately laid out: The first goal is the prevention of illness, injury, and disability. When this goal is not achievable, the attention focuses on assessment to design client-centered intervention, rehabilitation, treatment, or controls that use scientific evidence to support best practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信