{"title":"The impact of uncertainty stress and social support on the occupational well-being of healthcare professionals during public health emergencies.","authors":"Yun-Zhi Wang, Ying Xu, Ling-Zhen Ren, Yun Wang, Yu-Hong Xu, Ye-Feng Wang","doi":"10.1177/10519815241290021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has posed substantial challenges to the occupational well-being of healthcare professionals. Uncertainty stress and social support are potentially substantial in influencing well-being during public health emergencies.ObjectiveTo assess the impact of uncertainty stress and social support on the occupational well-being of healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic and elucidate the pathways of interaction among these factors.MethodsA cohort of 1028 healthcare professionals across 8 tertiary hospitals in Zhejiang Province were surveyed between May and June 2021 to evaluate their current occupational well-being, levels of uncertainty stress, and received social support. One-way analysis of variance, Pearson correlation analysis, and multiple linear regression models were utilised to analyse the factors influencing occupational well-being. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was employed to elucidate the pathways through which uncertainty stress and social support impact occupational well-being.ResultsThe overall average score for the occupational well-being of healthcare professionals was 3.13 ± 1.02, indicating a moderate level. Pearson correlation analysis identified a significant negative correlation between uncertainty stress and occupational well-being (<i>r = -0.456</i>, <i>P < 0.01</i>) and a positive correlation between social support and occupational well-being (<i>r = 0.219</i>, <i>P < 0.01</i>). Multiple linear regression analysis highlighted that years of service, nature of employment, job position, leisure time, personality traits, self-rated health, uncertainty stress, subjective social support, and utilisation of social support were significant predictors of occupational well-being (<i>P < 0.05</i> for each). The SEM analysis demonstrated that uncertainty stress directly reduced occupational well-being (<i>β = -0.274</i>, <i>P < 0.05</i>), whereas social support indirectly enhanced it by alleviating uncertainty stress (<i>β = 0.130</i>, <i>P < 0.05</i>).ConclusionUncertainty stress serves as a mediator in the relationship between social support and occupational well-being, with social support acting to buffer the effects of uncertainty stress and thereby enhance occupational well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":51373,"journal":{"name":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"908-917"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815241290021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has posed substantial challenges to the occupational well-being of healthcare professionals. Uncertainty stress and social support are potentially substantial in influencing well-being during public health emergencies.ObjectiveTo assess the impact of uncertainty stress and social support on the occupational well-being of healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic and elucidate the pathways of interaction among these factors.MethodsA cohort of 1028 healthcare professionals across 8 tertiary hospitals in Zhejiang Province were surveyed between May and June 2021 to evaluate their current occupational well-being, levels of uncertainty stress, and received social support. One-way analysis of variance, Pearson correlation analysis, and multiple linear regression models were utilised to analyse the factors influencing occupational well-being. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was employed to elucidate the pathways through which uncertainty stress and social support impact occupational well-being.ResultsThe overall average score for the occupational well-being of healthcare professionals was 3.13 ± 1.02, indicating a moderate level. Pearson correlation analysis identified a significant negative correlation between uncertainty stress and occupational well-being (r = -0.456, P < 0.01) and a positive correlation between social support and occupational well-being (r = 0.219, P < 0.01). Multiple linear regression analysis highlighted that years of service, nature of employment, job position, leisure time, personality traits, self-rated health, uncertainty stress, subjective social support, and utilisation of social support were significant predictors of occupational well-being (P < 0.05 for each). The SEM analysis demonstrated that uncertainty stress directly reduced occupational well-being (β = -0.274, P < 0.05), whereas social support indirectly enhanced it by alleviating uncertainty stress (β = 0.130, P < 0.05).ConclusionUncertainty stress serves as a mediator in the relationship between social support and occupational well-being, with social support acting to buffer the effects of uncertainty stress and thereby enhance occupational well-being.
期刊介绍:
WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation is an interdisciplinary, international journal which publishes high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts covering the entire scope of the occupation of work. The journal''s subtitle has been deliberately laid out: The first goal is the prevention of illness, injury, and disability. When this goal is not achievable, the attention focuses on assessment to design client-centered intervention, rehabilitation, treatment, or controls that use scientific evidence to support best practice.