Exploring Working Relationships Between Clinical Nurse Specialists and Clinical Nurse Leaders to Better Understand Opportunities for Improvement: A Phenomenological Qualitative Study.
{"title":"Exploring Working Relationships Between Clinical Nurse Specialists and Clinical Nurse Leaders to Better Understand Opportunities for Improvement: A Phenomenological Qualitative Study.","authors":"Jackeline Iseler, Mary Luciani, Bridget Graham","doi":"10.1097/NNA.0000000000001551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this descriptive qualitative study was to describe the experiences between clinical nurse specialists (CNS) and clinical nurse leaders (CNLs) at a Midwestern hospital.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical nurse specialists and CNLs are both nurses with advanced degrees yet differing specialties and responsibilities. Both focus on improving nursing and patient care but face challenges such as role definition and resource constraints.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sample of 8 CNSs and 9 CNLs from a Midwestern hospital were recruited to participate in focus groups to explore their experiences working together within the same organization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six themes were identified from the interviews: 1) organizational factors; 2) role identity and function; 3) communication practices and challenges; 4) value and visibility; 5) challenges and barriers; and 6) strategies and solutions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is important for administrative leadership to have a clear understanding of the scopes and unique significant contributions that the CNS and CNL each bring to healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":50108,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Administration","volume":"55 3","pages":"E12-E16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Administration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000001551","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this descriptive qualitative study was to describe the experiences between clinical nurse specialists (CNS) and clinical nurse leaders (CNLs) at a Midwestern hospital.
Background: Clinical nurse specialists and CNLs are both nurses with advanced degrees yet differing specialties and responsibilities. Both focus on improving nursing and patient care but face challenges such as role definition and resource constraints.
Methods: A sample of 8 CNSs and 9 CNLs from a Midwestern hospital were recruited to participate in focus groups to explore their experiences working together within the same organization.
Results: Six themes were identified from the interviews: 1) organizational factors; 2) role identity and function; 3) communication practices and challenges; 4) value and visibility; 5) challenges and barriers; and 6) strategies and solutions.
Conclusions: It is important for administrative leadership to have a clear understanding of the scopes and unique significant contributions that the CNS and CNL each bring to healthcare.
期刊介绍:
JONA™ is the authoritative source of information on developments and advances in patient care leadership. Content is geared to nurse executives, directors of nursing, and nurse managers in hospital, community health, and ambulatory care environments. Practical, innovative, and solution-oriented articles provide the tools and data needed to excel in executive practice in changing healthcare systems: leadership development; human, material, and financial resource management and relationships; systems, business, and financial strategies. All articles are peer-reviewed, selected and developed with the guidance of a distinguished group of editorial advisors.