FHIR Granular Sensitive Data Segmentation.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1055/a-2466-4371
Preston Lee, Daniel Mendoza, Martha Kaiser, Eric Lott, Gagandeep Singh, Adela Grando
{"title":"FHIR Granular Sensitive Data Segmentation.","authors":"Preston Lee, Daniel Mendoza, Martha Kaiser, Eric Lott, Gagandeep Singh, Adela Grando","doi":"10.1055/a-2466-4371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Due to fear of stigma, patients want more control over the sharing of sensitive medical records. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration (SAMHSA) and the Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) supported the development of standards-compliant, consent-respecting medical record exchange technology using metadata labeling (e.g., substance use information). Existing technologies must be updated with newer standards and support more than binary-sensitive categorizations to better align with how physicians categorize sensitive medical records.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong> Our goal was to deploy, pilot test, and share open-source Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR)-based data segmentation technologies. We pilot-tested the technologies using real-world patient electronic health record data in the context of substance use information. We involved physicians in designing a novel decision engine that supports various confidence levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> We deployed a web-based Patient Portal and Clinical Decision Support (CDS) granular data segmentation Engine to allow patients to make consent-based granular data choices (e.g., not sharing substance use medical records). Compared with previous solutions, the Engine innovates by using the latest Health Level 7 (HL7) standards to support data sensitivity labeling and redaction: FHIR R5 and its Consent resource type and CDS Hooks. It also supports configurable floating point confidence threshold cutoffs as opposed to binary medical record categorizations. Multiple engineering choices were made to simplify software development and maintenance and to improve technology adaptability, reusability, and scalability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> The resulting data segmentation technologies update SAMHSA and ONC software with the newest HL7 standards and better mimic how physicians categorize sensitive medical information with various confidence levels. To support reusability, we shared the resulting open-source code through the HL7 FHIR Foundry.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":"16 1","pages":"156-166"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11839247/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2466-4371","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Due to fear of stigma, patients want more control over the sharing of sensitive medical records. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration (SAMHSA) and the Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) supported the development of standards-compliant, consent-respecting medical record exchange technology using metadata labeling (e.g., substance use information). Existing technologies must be updated with newer standards and support more than binary-sensitive categorizations to better align with how physicians categorize sensitive medical records.

Objectives:  Our goal was to deploy, pilot test, and share open-source Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR)-based data segmentation technologies. We pilot-tested the technologies using real-world patient electronic health record data in the context of substance use information. We involved physicians in designing a novel decision engine that supports various confidence levels.

Results:  We deployed a web-based Patient Portal and Clinical Decision Support (CDS) granular data segmentation Engine to allow patients to make consent-based granular data choices (e.g., not sharing substance use medical records). Compared with previous solutions, the Engine innovates by using the latest Health Level 7 (HL7) standards to support data sensitivity labeling and redaction: FHIR R5 and its Consent resource type and CDS Hooks. It also supports configurable floating point confidence threshold cutoffs as opposed to binary medical record categorizations. Multiple engineering choices were made to simplify software development and maintenance and to improve technology adaptability, reusability, and scalability.

Conclusion:  The resulting data segmentation technologies update SAMHSA and ONC software with the newest HL7 standards and better mimic how physicians categorize sensitive medical information with various confidence levels. To support reusability, we shared the resulting open-source code through the HL7 FHIR Foundry.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信