Review and Analysis of Successful PSA Interventions: An Applied Perspective.

IF 2.2 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Alexander M McWilliam, Stuart Beattie, Nichola Callow
{"title":"Review and Analysis of Successful PSA Interventions: An Applied Perspective.","authors":"Alexander M McWilliam, Stuart Beattie, Nichola Callow","doi":"10.1080/00223980.2025.2459662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Public speaking can be a fear-inducing and anxiety-provoking experience for individuals, potentially resulting in poor performance and missed educational, social, and professional opportunities. In order to provide applied practitioners with effective methodologies for the reduction of public speaking anxiety (PSA), this paper aims to systematically review and meta-analyse theoretically driven interventions that successfully reduce PSA or maintain/increased public speaking performance. Following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis examined articles from 1 January 2000 to 1 June 2023. Of the 1293 articles identified, 26 studies with 2253 participants met the inclusion criteria. Research was of a moderate to high methodological standard, with interventions varying in type, duration, and focus (e.g., symptom vs. source). Intervention types included exposure, cognitive modification, combined, and other strategies. Although, the overall effect of psychological interventions for PSA across 42 interventions was <i>g</i> = 1.17 (95% CI = 0.88-1.45), with high heterogeneity, individual effect sizes varied greatly. While this review provides support for the efficacy of psychological interventions in reducing anxiety related to public speaking, rigorous research is warranted to examine long-term efficacy, real-world implications, self-efficacy development, and individual differences in treatment assignment. Finally, this review provides practitioners with a quick and easy guide to implementing successful interventions that reduce PSA or maintain/increase performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":48218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-39"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2025.2459662","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Public speaking can be a fear-inducing and anxiety-provoking experience for individuals, potentially resulting in poor performance and missed educational, social, and professional opportunities. In order to provide applied practitioners with effective methodologies for the reduction of public speaking anxiety (PSA), this paper aims to systematically review and meta-analyse theoretically driven interventions that successfully reduce PSA or maintain/increased public speaking performance. Following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis examined articles from 1 January 2000 to 1 June 2023. Of the 1293 articles identified, 26 studies with 2253 participants met the inclusion criteria. Research was of a moderate to high methodological standard, with interventions varying in type, duration, and focus (e.g., symptom vs. source). Intervention types included exposure, cognitive modification, combined, and other strategies. Although, the overall effect of psychological interventions for PSA across 42 interventions was g = 1.17 (95% CI = 0.88-1.45), with high heterogeneity, individual effect sizes varied greatly. While this review provides support for the efficacy of psychological interventions in reducing anxiety related to public speaking, rigorous research is warranted to examine long-term efficacy, real-world implications, self-efficacy development, and individual differences in treatment assignment. Finally, this review provides practitioners with a quick and easy guide to implementing successful interventions that reduce PSA or maintain/increase performance.

从应用的角度回顾和分析成功的PSA干预。
对个人来说,公开演讲是一种令人恐惧和焦虑的经历,可能会导致表现不佳,并错过教育、社交和职业机会。为了给应用从业者提供有效的方法来减少公共演讲焦虑(PSA),本文旨在系统地回顾和荟萃分析理论驱动的干预措施,成功地降低PSA或维持/提高公共演讲表现。根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目,对2000年1月1日至2023年6月1日期间的文章进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。在确认的1293篇文章中,26项研究有2253名参与者符合纳入标准。研究采用了中高的方法标准,干预措施在类型、持续时间和重点(如症状与来源)上各不相同。干预类型包括暴露、认知改变、联合和其他策略。尽管在42项干预措施中,心理干预对PSA的总体效果为g = 1.17 (95% CI = 0.88-1.45),但异质性较高,个体效应大小差异很大。虽然这篇综述为心理干预在减少公众演讲相关焦虑方面的有效性提供了支持,但需要严格的研究来检验长期疗效、现实世界的影响、自我效能的发展和治疗分配的个体差异。最后,本综述为从业人员提供了一个快速简便的指导,以实施成功的干预措施,降低PSA或维持/提高性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Psychology
Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychology is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes empirical research and theoretical articles in applied areas of psychology, including: Behavioral Psychology Clinical Psychology Cognitive Psychology Counseling Psychology Cultural Psychology Economic Psychology Educational Psychology Environmental Psychology Ethics in Psychology Family Psychology and Couples Psychology Forensic Psychology Health Psychology Industrial and Personnel Psychology Managerial and Leadership Psychology Measurement/Assessment Professional Practice Psychology of Religion Psychotherapy School Psychology Social Psychology Sport Psychology Work, Industrial and Organizational Psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信