Evaluation of Douyin Short Videos on Mammography in China: Quality and Reliability Analysis.

IF 3.3 Q2 ONCOLOGY
JMIR Cancer Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.2196/59483
Hongwu Yang, Chuangying Zhu, Chunyan Zhou, Ruibin Huang, Lipeng Huang, Peifen Chen, Shanshan Zhu, Huanpeng Wang, Chunmin Zhu
{"title":"Evaluation of Douyin Short Videos on Mammography in China: Quality and Reliability Analysis.","authors":"Hongwu Yang, Chuangying Zhu, Chunyan Zhou, Ruibin Huang, Lipeng Huang, Peifen Chen, Shanshan Zhu, Huanpeng Wang, Chunmin Zhu","doi":"10.2196/59483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumor and the fifth leading cause of cancer death worldwide, imposing a significant disease burden in China. Mammography is a key method for breast cancer screening, particularly for early diagnosis. Douyin, a popular social media platform, is increasingly used for sharing health information, but the quality and reliability of mammography-related videos remain unexamined.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the information quality and reliability of mammography videos on Douyin.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In October 2023, a search using the Chinese keywords for \"mammography\" and \"mammography screening\" was conducted on Douyin. From 200 retrieved videos, 136 mammography-related videos were selected for analysis. Basic video information, content, and sources were extracted. Video content was assessed for comprehensiveness across 7 categories: conception, examination process, applicable objects, precautions, combined examinations, advantages, and report. Completeness was evaluated using a researcher-developed checklist, while reliability and quality were measured using 2 modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) tool and the Global Quality Score (GQS). Correlations between video quality and characteristics were also examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the video sources, 82.4% (112/136) were attributed to health professionals, and 17.6% (24/136) were attributed to nonprofessionals. Among health professionals, only 1 was a radiologist. Overall, 77.2% (105/136) of the videos had useful information about mammography. Among the useful videos, the advantages of mammography were the most frequently covered topic (53/105, 50.5%). Median values for the mDISCERN and GQS evaluations across all videos stood at 2.5 (IQR 1.63-3) and 2 (IQR 1-2), respectively. Within the subgroup assessment, the median mDISCERN score among the useful and professional groups stood at 2 (IQR 2-3) and 3 (IQR 2-3), respectively, surpassing the corresponding score for the unhelpful and nonprofessional groups at 0 (IQR 0-0) and 0 (IQR 0-0.75; P<.001). Likewise, the median GQS among the useful and professional groups was evaluated at 2 (IQR 1.5-2) and 2 (IQR 1-2), respectively, eclipsing that of the unhelpful and nonprofessional groups at 1 (IQR 1-1) and 1 (IQR 1-1.37; P<.001). The GQS was weak and negatively correlated with the number of likes (r=-0.24; P=.004), comments (r=-0.29; P<.001), and saves (r=-0.20; P=.02). The mDISCERN score was weak and negatively correlated with the number of likes (r=-0.26; P=.002), comments (r=-0.36; P<.001), saves (r=-0.22; P=.009), and shares (r=-0.18; P=.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The overall quality of mammography videos on Douyin is suboptimal, with most content uploaded by clinicians rather than radiologists. Radiologists should be encouraged to create accurate and informative videos to better educate patients. As Douyin grows as a health information platform, stricter publishing standards are needed to enhance the quality of medical content.</p>","PeriodicalId":45538,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Cancer","volume":"11 ","pages":"e59483"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11864564/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/59483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumor and the fifth leading cause of cancer death worldwide, imposing a significant disease burden in China. Mammography is a key method for breast cancer screening, particularly for early diagnosis. Douyin, a popular social media platform, is increasingly used for sharing health information, but the quality and reliability of mammography-related videos remain unexamined.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the information quality and reliability of mammography videos on Douyin.

Methods: In October 2023, a search using the Chinese keywords for "mammography" and "mammography screening" was conducted on Douyin. From 200 retrieved videos, 136 mammography-related videos were selected for analysis. Basic video information, content, and sources were extracted. Video content was assessed for comprehensiveness across 7 categories: conception, examination process, applicable objects, precautions, combined examinations, advantages, and report. Completeness was evaluated using a researcher-developed checklist, while reliability and quality were measured using 2 modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) tool and the Global Quality Score (GQS). Correlations between video quality and characteristics were also examined.

Results: Among the video sources, 82.4% (112/136) were attributed to health professionals, and 17.6% (24/136) were attributed to nonprofessionals. Among health professionals, only 1 was a radiologist. Overall, 77.2% (105/136) of the videos had useful information about mammography. Among the useful videos, the advantages of mammography were the most frequently covered topic (53/105, 50.5%). Median values for the mDISCERN and GQS evaluations across all videos stood at 2.5 (IQR 1.63-3) and 2 (IQR 1-2), respectively. Within the subgroup assessment, the median mDISCERN score among the useful and professional groups stood at 2 (IQR 2-3) and 3 (IQR 2-3), respectively, surpassing the corresponding score for the unhelpful and nonprofessional groups at 0 (IQR 0-0) and 0 (IQR 0-0.75; P<.001). Likewise, the median GQS among the useful and professional groups was evaluated at 2 (IQR 1.5-2) and 2 (IQR 1-2), respectively, eclipsing that of the unhelpful and nonprofessional groups at 1 (IQR 1-1) and 1 (IQR 1-1.37; P<.001). The GQS was weak and negatively correlated with the number of likes (r=-0.24; P=.004), comments (r=-0.29; P<.001), and saves (r=-0.20; P=.02). The mDISCERN score was weak and negatively correlated with the number of likes (r=-0.26; P=.002), comments (r=-0.36; P<.001), saves (r=-0.22; P=.009), and shares (r=-0.18; P=.03).

Conclusions: The overall quality of mammography videos on Douyin is suboptimal, with most content uploaded by clinicians rather than radiologists. Radiologists should be encouraged to create accurate and informative videos to better educate patients. As Douyin grows as a health information platform, stricter publishing standards are needed to enhance the quality of medical content.

中国乳房x光短视频抖音评价:质量与可靠性分析。
背景:乳腺癌是世界上最常见的恶性肿瘤,也是癌症死亡的第五大原因,在中国造成了巨大的疾病负担。乳房x光检查是乳腺癌筛查,尤其是早期诊断的关键方法。抖音是一个流行的社交媒体平台,越来越多地用于分享健康信息,但乳房x光检查相关视频的质量和可靠性仍未得到检验。目的:评价抖音乳房x线影像的信息质量和可靠性。方法:于2023年10月在抖音上使用中文关键词“乳房x线摄影”和“乳房x线摄影筛查”进行检索。从检索到的200个视频中,选取了136个与乳房x线摄影相关的视频进行分析。提取基本视频信息、内容和来源。从概念、检查过程、适用对象、注意事项、组合检查、优势、报告等7个方面对视频内容进行全面性评价。使用研究人员开发的检查表评估完整性,而使用2改进的DISCERN (mDISCERN)工具和全球质量评分(GQS)测量可靠性和质量。视频质量和特征之间的相关性也进行了检验。结果:视频来源中,卫生专业人员占82.4%(112/136),非专业人员占17.6%(24/136)。在卫生专业人员中,只有1人是放射科医生。总体而言,77.2%(105/136)的视频包含有关乳房x光检查的有用信息。在有用的视频中,乳房x光检查的优点是最常被提及的话题(53/ 105,50.5%)。在所有视频中,mDISCERN和GQS评估的中位数分别为2.5 (IQR 1.63-3)和2 (IQR 1-2)。在亚组评估中,有用组和专业组的mDISCERN得分中位数分别为2 (IQR 2-3)和3 (IQR 2-3),超过了无用组和非专业组的相应得分0 (IQR 0-0)和0 (IQR 0-0.75);p结论:抖音乳房x光视频总体质量不理想,上传内容多为临床医生而非放射科医生。应该鼓励放射科医生制作准确和信息丰富的视频,以更好地教育患者。随着抖音作为健康信息平台的发展,需要更严格的发布标准来提高医疗内容的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Cancer
JMIR Cancer ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信