Medical Discourse on Suicide in Post-War Britain - To Decriminalize Suicide and Attempted Suicide.

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 ASIAN STUDIES
Hye Jean Hwang
{"title":"Medical Discourse on Suicide in Post-War Britain - To Decriminalize Suicide and Attempted Suicide.","authors":"Hye Jean Hwang","doi":"10.13081/kjmh.2024.33.733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to reconstruct the medical discourse on suicide in the late 1940s and 1950s and identify the strategies employed by medical professionals to decriminalize suicide. Despite the emergence of suicide as an important social issue in post-war Britain, the subject remained largely outside the purview of the public, policy makers and various specialist groups. However, the medical community approached the topic from a professional perspective, formed collective opinions as a specialist group, and sought to change the status quo and existing laws related to suicide. As a result, they became the only group actively engaged in the movement for suicide law reform. The strategies devised by medical professionals proved effective. They distanced themselves from moral and religious debates, framing suicide as a practical and value-neutral issue. They also adhered to a deterministic paradigm, defining suicide as the result of uncontrollable and, therefore, excusable circumstances. Factors such as mental illness, social isolation, and specific familial background were identified as major contributors to self-destruction. By focusing on cases of attempted suicide, rather than completed suicides, they shifted the debate in their favor. Finally, they argued that decriminalizing suicide would not weaken social control but instead provide a solid foundation for more efficient and powerful regulation. This discourse produced by medical professionals ultimately culminated in the passage of the Suicide Act 1961.</p>","PeriodicalId":42441,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Medical History","volume":"33 3","pages":"733-767"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11855047/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Medical History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13081/kjmh.2024.33.733","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to reconstruct the medical discourse on suicide in the late 1940s and 1950s and identify the strategies employed by medical professionals to decriminalize suicide. Despite the emergence of suicide as an important social issue in post-war Britain, the subject remained largely outside the purview of the public, policy makers and various specialist groups. However, the medical community approached the topic from a professional perspective, formed collective opinions as a specialist group, and sought to change the status quo and existing laws related to suicide. As a result, they became the only group actively engaged in the movement for suicide law reform. The strategies devised by medical professionals proved effective. They distanced themselves from moral and religious debates, framing suicide as a practical and value-neutral issue. They also adhered to a deterministic paradigm, defining suicide as the result of uncontrollable and, therefore, excusable circumstances. Factors such as mental illness, social isolation, and specific familial background were identified as major contributors to self-destruction. By focusing on cases of attempted suicide, rather than completed suicides, they shifted the debate in their favor. Finally, they argued that decriminalizing suicide would not weaken social control but instead provide a solid foundation for more efficient and powerful regulation. This discourse produced by medical professionals ultimately culminated in the passage of the Suicide Act 1961.

战后英国关于自杀的医学论述——使自杀和自杀未遂合法化。
本研究旨在重建20世纪40年代末和50年代关于自杀的医学话语,并确定医学专业人员为使自杀合法化所采用的策略。尽管自杀在战后的英国成为一个重要的社会问题,但这个问题在很大程度上仍然超出了公众、政策制定者和各种专家团体的研究范围。然而,医学界从专业的角度来处理这个问题,形成了一个专家组的集体意见,并试图改变现状和现有的有关自杀的法律。因此,他们成为唯一积极参与自杀法改革运动的群体。医学专家设计的策略被证明是有效的。他们将自己与道德和宗教辩论拉开距离,将自杀定义为一个实际的、价值中立的问题。他们还坚持一种决定论的范式,将自杀定义为无法控制的结果,因此是可以原谅的情况。精神疾病、社会孤立和特定的家庭背景等因素被认为是导致自我毁灭的主要因素。通过关注自杀未遂案例,而不是自杀未遂案例,他们将辩论转向了对自己有利的方向。最后,他们认为,将自杀合法化不会削弱社会控制,反而会为更有效、更有力的监管提供坚实的基础。医疗专业人员提出的这一讨论最终导致了1961年《自杀法》的通过。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信