The European Telecommunication Standards Institute (ETSI): in search for legitimacy and resilience of European standardisation.

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
Olia Kanevskaia, Panagiotis Delimatsis, Stephanie Bijlmakers
{"title":"The European Telecommunication Standards Institute (ETSI): in search for legitimacy and resilience of European standardisation.","authors":"Olia Kanevskaia, Panagiotis Delimatsis, Stephanie Bijlmakers","doi":"10.1080/13511610.2024.2395262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>European standardisation, a key institution for the functioning of the EU single market, functions at the crossroads of private rule-making and public policy. Recently, it has been subjected to fierce scrutiny by the European Commission and the European Court of Justice. Expressed concerns relate to the legal value of standards and the legitimacy of institutions creating them but have broader implications for European competitiveness, highlighting the strategic role of standards. By far much of this critique has been directed towards the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI), the EU's crown jewel of technology standardisation. ETSI's normative power manifests itself in policymaking, legislation and market processes, rendering it an interesting organisation to study as a proxy to understand the legitimacy and resilience of European standardisation. Against this backdrop, this introduction sets the theoretical and legal context for this Special Issue. Upon discussing the background and dynamic of European standardisation, it provides a theoretical framework for 'crises' and 'legitimacy', tailoring it to the particular case of ETSI and the challenges it faces at the policy and judicial level. Lastly, it provides a critical reflection on the Research Articles in this Special Issue, linking them to the current discourses on legitimacy and resilience.</p>","PeriodicalId":46877,"journal":{"name":"Innovation-The European Journal of Social Science Research","volume":"37 5","pages":"1269-1288"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11835305/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation-The European Journal of Social Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2024.2395262","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

European standardisation, a key institution for the functioning of the EU single market, functions at the crossroads of private rule-making and public policy. Recently, it has been subjected to fierce scrutiny by the European Commission and the European Court of Justice. Expressed concerns relate to the legal value of standards and the legitimacy of institutions creating them but have broader implications for European competitiveness, highlighting the strategic role of standards. By far much of this critique has been directed towards the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI), the EU's crown jewel of technology standardisation. ETSI's normative power manifests itself in policymaking, legislation and market processes, rendering it an interesting organisation to study as a proxy to understand the legitimacy and resilience of European standardisation. Against this backdrop, this introduction sets the theoretical and legal context for this Special Issue. Upon discussing the background and dynamic of European standardisation, it provides a theoretical framework for 'crises' and 'legitimacy', tailoring it to the particular case of ETSI and the challenges it faces at the policy and judicial level. Lastly, it provides a critical reflection on the Research Articles in this Special Issue, linking them to the current discourses on legitimacy and resilience.

欧洲电信标准协会(ETSI):寻求欧洲标准化的合法性和弹性。
欧洲标准化是欧盟单一市场运作的一个关键机构,处于私人规则制定和公共政策的十字路口。最近,它受到了欧盟委员会(European Commission)和欧洲法院(European Court of Justice)的严格审查。所表达的担忧涉及标准的法律价值和制定标准的机构的合法性,但对欧洲的竞争力有更广泛的影响,突出了标准的战略作用。到目前为止,这些批评大多是针对欧洲电信标准协会(ETSI)的,它是欧盟技术标准化的皇冠上的明珠。ETSI的规范性权力体现在政策制定、立法和市场过程中,使其成为一个有趣的组织,可以作为了解欧洲标准化合法性和弹性的代理来研究。在此背景下,本导言为本期特刊奠定了理论和法律背景。在讨论欧洲标准化的背景和动态后,它为“危机”和“合法性”提供了一个理论框架,将其剪裁为ETSI的特定案例及其在政策和司法层面面临的挑战。最后,它对本期特刊中的研究文章进行了批判性反思,将它们与当前关于合法性和弹性的话语联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
15.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: European integration and enlargement pose fundamental challenges for policy, politics, citizenship, culture and democracy. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research provides a unique forum for discussing these processes. It welcomes articles on all aspects of European developments that contribute to the improvement of social science knowledge and to the setting of a policy-focused European research agenda. Examples of typical subject areas covered include •Policy-Making and Agenda-Setting •Multilevel Governance •The Role of Institutions •Democracy and Civil Society •Social Structures and Integration •Sustainability and Ecological Modernisation •Science, Research, Technology and Society
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信