Lessons learned from evaluating defined chemical mixtures in a high-throughput estrogen receptor assay system.

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Fred Parham, Kristin M Eccles, Cynthia V Rider, Srilatha Sakamuru, Menghang Xia, Ruili Huang, Raymond R Tice, Gregg E Dinse, Michael J DeVito
{"title":"Lessons learned from evaluating defined chemical mixtures in a high-throughput estrogen receptor assay system.","authors":"Fred Parham, Kristin M Eccles, Cynthia V Rider, Srilatha Sakamuru, Menghang Xia, Ruili Huang, Raymond R Tice, Gregg E Dinse, Michael J DeVito","doi":"10.1093/toxsci/kfaf020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this article, we provide a proof of concept evaluating the utility of the U.S. Tox21 high-throughput screening approach to assess the hazard of chemical mixtures using 2 estrogen receptor (ER) assays. A subset of chemicals identified in Phase I of the Tox21 program as active in the ER agonist assay were used to design mixtures for testing in Phase II. Individual chemicals and mixtures were evaluated in 2 cell-based ER alpha (ERα) activation assays: One incorporating a transfected ligand-binding domain in an ERα β-lactamase reporter cell line (ER-bla) and the full-length endogenous receptor in the MCF7 cell line with a luciferase reporter gene (ER-luc). Concentration-response data from individual chemicals were used to predict the joint effect based on mixtures modeling methods and were compared with observed mixtures data to assess model fit. The models tended to overpredict mixture responses in the ER-bla assay, whereas predictions were closer to observed responses in the ER-luc assay, indicating that a full-length endogenous ER is a preferred model for high-throughput mixture analysis. Lessons learned from this research include the importance of analyzing the individual chemicals used for predictions and the mixtures in the same experimental paradigm to minimize variation, developing methods for imputing missing values from incomplete concentration-response curves, and establishing criteria to determine when inactive chemicals should be omitted from mixture predictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23178,"journal":{"name":"Toxicological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"191-204"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12038247/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfaf020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, we provide a proof of concept evaluating the utility of the U.S. Tox21 high-throughput screening approach to assess the hazard of chemical mixtures using 2 estrogen receptor (ER) assays. A subset of chemicals identified in Phase I of the Tox21 program as active in the ER agonist assay were used to design mixtures for testing in Phase II. Individual chemicals and mixtures were evaluated in 2 cell-based ER alpha (ERα) activation assays: One incorporating a transfected ligand-binding domain in an ERα β-lactamase reporter cell line (ER-bla) and the full-length endogenous receptor in the MCF7 cell line with a luciferase reporter gene (ER-luc). Concentration-response data from individual chemicals were used to predict the joint effect based on mixtures modeling methods and were compared with observed mixtures data to assess model fit. The models tended to overpredict mixture responses in the ER-bla assay, whereas predictions were closer to observed responses in the ER-luc assay, indicating that a full-length endogenous ER is a preferred model for high-throughput mixture analysis. Lessons learned from this research include the importance of analyzing the individual chemicals used for predictions and the mixtures in the same experimental paradigm to minimize variation, developing methods for imputing missing values from incomplete concentration-response curves, and establishing criteria to determine when inactive chemicals should be omitted from mixture predictions.

在高通量雌激素受体测定系统中评估确定的化学混合物的经验教训。
在本文中,我们提供了一个概念证明,评估美国Tox21高通量筛选方法的效用,以评估化学混合物的危害,使用两种雌激素受体测定。在Tox21项目的第一阶段确定的在雌激素受体(ER)激动剂试验中具有活性的化学物质子集被用于设计用于第二阶段测试的混合物。在两种基于细胞的雌激素受体α (ERα)激活试验中评估了单个化学物质和混合物:一种是在ERα β-内酰胺酶报告细胞系(ER-bla)中加入转染的配体结合结构域,另一种是在带有荧光素酶报告基因(ER-luc)的MCF7细胞系中加入全长内源性受体。基于混合建模方法,使用来自单个化学品的浓度-响应数据来预测联合效应,并将其与观察到的混合物数据进行比较,以评估模型的拟合性。在ER-bla实验中,模型倾向于过度预测混合反应,而在ER-luc实验中,预测结果更接近观察到的反应,这表明全长内源性雌激素受体是高通量混合分析的首选模型。从这项研究中得到的教训包括分析用于预测的单个化学物质和在同一实验范式中的混合物的重要性,以尽量减少变化,开发从不完整浓度-响应曲线中输入缺失值的方法,以及建立确定何时应从混合物预测中省略非活性化学物质的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Toxicological Sciences
Toxicological Sciences 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
7.90%
发文量
118
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The mission of Toxicological Sciences, the official journal of the Society of Toxicology, is to publish a broad spectrum of impactful research in the field of toxicology. The primary focus of Toxicological Sciences is on original research articles. The journal also provides expert insight via contemporary and systematic reviews, as well as forum articles and editorial content that addresses important topics in the field. The scope of Toxicological Sciences is focused on a broad spectrum of impactful toxicological research that will advance the multidisciplinary field of toxicology ranging from basic research to model development and application, and decision making. Submissions will include diverse technologies and approaches including, but not limited to: bioinformatics and computational biology, biochemistry, exposure science, histopathology, mass spectrometry, molecular biology, population-based sciences, tissue and cell-based systems, and whole-animal studies. Integrative approaches that combine realistic exposure scenarios with impactful analyses that move the field forward are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信