Immune checkpoint inhibitors plus paclitaxel-based chemotherapy vs. oxaliplatin-based therapy as first-line treatment for patients with HER2-negative unresectable or metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer: results of a multicenter retrospective study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Translational cancer research Pub Date : 2025-01-31 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.21037/tcr-24-1089
Yulu Fang, Yifan Zhao, Xiaoling Zhang, Xiaofu Yu, Shuxun Liu, Gang Tao, Yunshan Yang, Haijun Zhong, Zhong Shi
{"title":"Immune checkpoint inhibitors plus paclitaxel-based chemotherapy <i>vs.</i> oxaliplatin-based therapy as first-line treatment for patients with HER2-negative unresectable or metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer: results of a multicenter retrospective study.","authors":"Yulu Fang, Yifan Zhao, Xiaoling Zhang, Xiaofu Yu, Shuxun Liu, Gang Tao, Yunshan Yang, Haijun Zhong, Zhong Shi","doi":"10.21037/tcr-24-1089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For unresectable or metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer (G/GEJC), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus platinum-based doublet chemotherapy [FOLFOX (leucovorin, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) and XELOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin)] are currently recommended as the standard first-line treatment. Research indicates that ICIs combined with paclitaxel have a synergistic effect, but the evidence is insufficient. This multicenter, retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of ICIs [mainly anti-programmed cell death-1 (anti-PD-1) antibodies] plus a paclitaxel-based chemotherapy regimen (ICIs plus PTX) <i>vs.</i> an oxaliplatin-based regimen (ICIs plus OXA) as the first-line therapy for advanced G/GEJC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This research involved 123 patients with advanced G/GEJC at three institutions in China from August 2019 to June 2022. The ICIs plus PTX group included 58 patients, whereas the ICIs plus OXA group included 65 patients. We compared the efficacy and safety of two treatment regimens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-eight patients (47.2%) received ICIs plus PTX, and 65 patients (52.8%) received ICIs plus OXA. The median progression-free survival (PFS) [8.07 <i>vs.</i> 7.23 months; hazard ratio (HR) =0.845; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.568-1.257; P=0.40] and overall survival (OS) (14.83 <i>vs.</i> 15.10 months; HR =0.852; 95% CI: 0.536-1.355; P=0.50) were not significantly different between the ICIs plus PTX group and the ICIs plus OXA group. The objective response rate (ORR) (50.0% <i>vs.</i> 53.8%, P=0.67) and disease control rate (DCR) (98.3% <i>vs.</i> 93.8%, P=0.21) were also similar between the PTX and OXA groups, and both treatments exhibited manageable side effects. Subgroup analysis based on patient characteristics suggested that PFS HRs favored the ICIs plus PTX subgroup in patients aged <65 years or without liver metastasis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In summary, ICIs plus PTX are as effective as ICIs plus OXA for treating advanced G/GEJC with manageable toxicity. The advantages of ICIs plus PTX in terms of adverse events (AEs) may support it as an alternative to ICIs plus OXA.</p>","PeriodicalId":23216,"journal":{"name":"Translational cancer research","volume":"14 1","pages":"327-339"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11833363/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-24-1089","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: For unresectable or metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer (G/GEJC), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus platinum-based doublet chemotherapy [FOLFOX (leucovorin, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) and XELOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin)] are currently recommended as the standard first-line treatment. Research indicates that ICIs combined with paclitaxel have a synergistic effect, but the evidence is insufficient. This multicenter, retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of ICIs [mainly anti-programmed cell death-1 (anti-PD-1) antibodies] plus a paclitaxel-based chemotherapy regimen (ICIs plus PTX) vs. an oxaliplatin-based regimen (ICIs plus OXA) as the first-line therapy for advanced G/GEJC.

Methods: This research involved 123 patients with advanced G/GEJC at three institutions in China from August 2019 to June 2022. The ICIs plus PTX group included 58 patients, whereas the ICIs plus OXA group included 65 patients. We compared the efficacy and safety of two treatment regimens.

Results: Fifty-eight patients (47.2%) received ICIs plus PTX, and 65 patients (52.8%) received ICIs plus OXA. The median progression-free survival (PFS) [8.07 vs. 7.23 months; hazard ratio (HR) =0.845; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.568-1.257; P=0.40] and overall survival (OS) (14.83 vs. 15.10 months; HR =0.852; 95% CI: 0.536-1.355; P=0.50) were not significantly different between the ICIs plus PTX group and the ICIs plus OXA group. The objective response rate (ORR) (50.0% vs. 53.8%, P=0.67) and disease control rate (DCR) (98.3% vs. 93.8%, P=0.21) were also similar between the PTX and OXA groups, and both treatments exhibited manageable side effects. Subgroup analysis based on patient characteristics suggested that PFS HRs favored the ICIs plus PTX subgroup in patients aged <65 years or without liver metastasis.

Conclusions: In summary, ICIs plus PTX are as effective as ICIs plus OXA for treating advanced G/GEJC with manageable toxicity. The advantages of ICIs plus PTX in terms of adverse events (AEs) may support it as an alternative to ICIs plus OXA.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
252
期刊介绍: Translational Cancer Research (Transl Cancer Res TCR; Print ISSN: 2218-676X; Online ISSN 2219-6803; http://tcr.amegroups.com/) is an Open Access, peer-reviewed journal, indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE). TCR publishes laboratory studies of novel therapeutic interventions as well as clinical trials which evaluate new treatment paradigms for cancer; results of novel research investigations which bridge the laboratory and clinical settings including risk assessment, cellular and molecular characterization, prevention, detection, diagnosis and treatment of human cancers with the overall goal of improving the clinical care of cancer patients. The focus of TCR is original, peer-reviewed, science-based research that successfully advances clinical medicine toward the goal of improving patients'' quality of life. The editors and an international advisory group of scientists and clinician-scientists as well as other experts will hold TCR articles to the high-quality standards. We accept Original Articles as well as Review Articles, Editorials and Brief Articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信