Posterior Plating versus Anterior to Posterior Screws in Fixation of Posterior Column in Pilon Fractures.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Mostafa M Baraka, Tamer A Fayyad, Mootaz F Thakeb, Mina A Lamei, Mohamed A Al Kersh
{"title":"Posterior Plating versus Anterior to Posterior Screws in Fixation of Posterior Column in Pilon Fractures.","authors":"Mostafa M Baraka, Tamer A Fayyad, Mootaz F Thakeb, Mina A Lamei, Mohamed A Al Kersh","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the results of anterior to posterior screws (AP screws) versus posterior buttress plating in the fixation of posterior columns fractures in pilon injuries, regarding the 1) functional and 2) radiological outcomes and 3) the incidence of complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design: Prospective, randomized clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single Center, Level 1 trauma Center.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>All patients with two, three and four column fracture according to the four-column classification (OTA/AO 43-C1 and 43-C2) during the study period were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomized into two groups: direct reduction and fixation by posterior buttress plating (group A) and indirect reduction with fixation by AP screws (group B). Exclusion criteria included pediatric age group with open physis, pathological fractures, open fractures and fractures with neurovascular injuries. The minimum follow up period was 24 months.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>The primary outcome was the quality of reduction as evaluated using postoperative plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT). Secondary outcomes included the functional American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and the incidence of complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>30 patients were included, 15 patients were randomized to group A (mean age 42.3 (range 19-65) and 15 patients in group B (mean age 38.0 in group B (range 23-58). The mean follow up was 32 months (24-45 months). Anatomical reduction was achieved in 80% and 26.7% of group A and group B respectively. AOFAS score was significantly higher in group A compared to group B (p=0.03). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the time to union and the complication rates (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A higher percentage of anatomical reduction was associated with direct reduction and posterior buttress plating compared to indirect reduction and anterior to posterior screws. This was reflected by a significantly higher AOFAS score.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002966","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the results of anterior to posterior screws (AP screws) versus posterior buttress plating in the fixation of posterior columns fractures in pilon injuries, regarding the 1) functional and 2) radiological outcomes and 3) the incidence of complications.

Methods: Design: Prospective, randomized clinical trial.

Setting: Single Center, Level 1 trauma Center.

Patient selection criteria: All patients with two, three and four column fracture according to the four-column classification (OTA/AO 43-C1 and 43-C2) during the study period were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomized into two groups: direct reduction and fixation by posterior buttress plating (group A) and indirect reduction with fixation by AP screws (group B). Exclusion criteria included pediatric age group with open physis, pathological fractures, open fractures and fractures with neurovascular injuries. The minimum follow up period was 24 months.

Outcome measures and comparisons: The primary outcome was the quality of reduction as evaluated using postoperative plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT). Secondary outcomes included the functional American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and the incidence of complications.

Results: 30 patients were included, 15 patients were randomized to group A (mean age 42.3 (range 19-65) and 15 patients in group B (mean age 38.0 in group B (range 23-58). The mean follow up was 32 months (24-45 months). Anatomical reduction was achieved in 80% and 26.7% of group A and group B respectively. AOFAS score was significantly higher in group A compared to group B (p=0.03). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the time to union and the complication rates (p>0.05).

Conclusions: A higher percentage of anatomical reduction was associated with direct reduction and posterior buttress plating compared to indirect reduction and anterior to posterior screws. This was reflected by a significantly higher AOFAS score.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信