Posterior Plating Versus Anterior to Posterior Screws in Fixation of Posterior Column in Pilon Fractures.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Mostafa M Baraka, Tamer A Fayyad, Mootaz F Thakeb, Mina A Lamei, Mohamed A Al Kersh
{"title":"Posterior Plating Versus Anterior to Posterior Screws in Fixation of Posterior Column in Pilon Fractures.","authors":"Mostafa M Baraka, Tamer A Fayyad, Mootaz F Thakeb, Mina A Lamei, Mohamed A Al Kersh","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the results of anterior to posterior screws (AP screws) versus posterior buttress plating in the fixation of posterior column fractures in pilon injuries regarding the (1) functional and (2) radiological outcomes and (3) the incidence of complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong></p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, randomized clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single Center, Level 1 trauma Center.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>All patients with 2-, 3-, and 4-column fracture according to the 4-column classification (orthopedic trauma association/Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen 43-C1 and 43-C2) during the study period were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomized into 2 groups: direct reduction and fixation by posterior buttress plating (group A) and indirect reduction with fixation by AP screws (group B). Exclusion criteria included pediatric age group with open physis, pathological fractures, open fractures, and fractures with neurovascular injuries. The minimum follow-up period was 24 months.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>The primary outcome was the quality of reduction as evaluated using postoperative plain radiographs and computed tomography. Secondary outcomes included the functional American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and the incidence of complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients were included, 15 patients were randomized to group A [mean age 42.3 (range 19-65)] and 15 patients in group B [mean age 38.0 in group B (range 23-58)]. The mean follow-up was 32 months (24-45 months). Anatomical reduction was achieved in 80% and 26.7% of group A and group B, respectively. The AOFAS score was significantly higher in group A compared with group B ( P = 0.03). There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the time to union and the complication rates ( P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A higher percentage of anatomical reduction was associated with direct reduction and posterior buttress plating compared with indirect reduction and AP screws. This was reflected by a significantly higher AOFAS score.Clinical Trials Registration Number: NCT05303389.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":"288-295"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002966","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the results of anterior to posterior screws (AP screws) versus posterior buttress plating in the fixation of posterior column fractures in pilon injuries regarding the (1) functional and (2) radiological outcomes and (3) the incidence of complications.

Methods:

Design: Prospective, randomized clinical trial.

Setting: Single Center, Level 1 trauma Center.

Patient selection criteria: All patients with 2-, 3-, and 4-column fracture according to the 4-column classification (orthopedic trauma association/Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen 43-C1 and 43-C2) during the study period were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomized into 2 groups: direct reduction and fixation by posterior buttress plating (group A) and indirect reduction with fixation by AP screws (group B). Exclusion criteria included pediatric age group with open physis, pathological fractures, open fractures, and fractures with neurovascular injuries. The minimum follow-up period was 24 months.

Outcome measures and comparisons: The primary outcome was the quality of reduction as evaluated using postoperative plain radiographs and computed tomography. Secondary outcomes included the functional American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and the incidence of complications.

Results: Thirty patients were included, 15 patients were randomized to group A [mean age 42.3 (range 19-65)] and 15 patients in group B [mean age 38.0 in group B (range 23-58)]. The mean follow-up was 32 months (24-45 months). Anatomical reduction was achieved in 80% and 26.7% of group A and group B, respectively. The AOFAS score was significantly higher in group A compared with group B ( P = 0.03). There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the time to union and the complication rates ( P > 0.05).

Conclusions: A higher percentage of anatomical reduction was associated with direct reduction and posterior buttress plating compared with indirect reduction and AP screws. This was reflected by a significantly higher AOFAS score.Clinical Trials Registration Number: NCT05303389.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

后路钢板与前后路螺钉在固定皮隆骨折后柱中的应用。
目的:比较前后路螺钉(AP螺钉)与后路支撑钢板固定pilon损伤后柱骨折的结果,包括1)功能和2)放射学结果以及3)并发症的发生率。方法:设计:前瞻性、随机临床试验。地点:单中心,一级创伤中心。患者选择标准:研究期间所有根据四柱分类(OTA/AO 43-C1和43-C2)发生二柱、三柱和四柱骨折的患者均符合入选条件。将患者随机分为两组:A组采用后支板直接复位固定(A组)和AP螺钉间接复位固定(B组)。排除标准包括开放性骨折、病理性骨折、开放性骨折和骨折合并神经血管损伤的儿童年龄组。最小随访时间为24个月。结果测量和比较:主要结果是通过术后x线平片和计算机断层扫描(CT)评估复位质量。次要结果包括美国骨科足踝协会(AOFAS)功能评分和并发症发生率。结果:纳入30例患者,15例患者随机分为A组(平均年龄42.3岁,范围19 ~ 65岁)和B组(平均年龄38.0岁,范围23 ~ 58岁)。平均随访32个月(24 ~ 45个月)。A组解剖复位80%,B组解剖复位26.7%。A组AOFAS评分显著高于B组(p=0.03)。两组患者愈合时间及并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:与间接复位和前后路螺钉相比,直接复位和后路支架钢板的解剖复位比例更高。这反映在显著较高的AOFAS分数上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信