BRAF inhibitors with or without MEK inhibitors in advanced BRAF-positive non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Animesh Saha, T Raja, Amit Dutt Dwary, Indranil Ghosh, Prabrajya Narayan Mahapatra, Tanmoy Mukhopadhay
{"title":"BRAF inhibitors with or without MEK inhibitors in advanced BRAF-positive non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review.","authors":"Animesh Saha, T Raja, Amit Dutt Dwary, Indranil Ghosh, Prabrajya Narayan Mahapatra, Tanmoy Mukhopadhay","doi":"10.1177/10781552251322452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>About 1% to 5% of cases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been found to have a BRAF mutation. There is no phase III data, despite the fact that numerous phase II and retrospective studies have demonstrated the efficacy of single agent BRAF inhibition and combination BRAF/MEK inhibition in patient groups that have received treatment and those who have not. Our goal in this systematic review was to provide an overview of the available evidence in this context.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A thorough search was conducted in the PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases for English-language papers published between January 2000 and December 2023 that had full text accessibility. Independently, one author screened the eligible studies that fit our predetermined requirements. A synthesis of the qualitative data was conducted, and the design and quality of the studies were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Data summary: </strong>There were 2952 articles found using the search method. Twelve publications with a total of 753 patients were included after two rounds of screening. 33-75% was the objective response rate (ORR). 64-100% was the disease control rate (DCR). The time span for the answer varied from 6.4 to 16.7 months. The range of the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.2 to 17.5 months. The range of the median overall survival (OS) was 1.7-25.5 months. When comparing studies with single agent BRAF inhibitors to those reporting the results of BRAF plus MEK inhibitors, the response rates, duration of response, and survival were better in the former case. When untreated patients receiving BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy were compared to previously treated patients, the results were also improved. Hypertension, pyrexia, hyponatremia, neutropenia, dyspnoea, anaemia, abnormal liver function, asthenia, and cutaneous epidermoid carcinoma were among the frequently reported grade ≥3 toxicity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with advanced NSCLC that include a BRAF mutation have demonstrated encouraging clinical outcomes with a manageable safety profile when treated with BRAF inhibitors, either in combination with or without MEK inhibitor therapy. In patients who had not received treatment before, combination treatment produced greater results.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"10781552251322452"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552251322452","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: About 1% to 5% of cases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been found to have a BRAF mutation. There is no phase III data, despite the fact that numerous phase II and retrospective studies have demonstrated the efficacy of single agent BRAF inhibition and combination BRAF/MEK inhibition in patient groups that have received treatment and those who have not. Our goal in this systematic review was to provide an overview of the available evidence in this context.

Data sources: A thorough search was conducted in the PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases for English-language papers published between January 2000 and December 2023 that had full text accessibility. Independently, one author screened the eligible studies that fit our predetermined requirements. A synthesis of the qualitative data was conducted, and the design and quality of the studies were evaluated.

Data summary: There were 2952 articles found using the search method. Twelve publications with a total of 753 patients were included after two rounds of screening. 33-75% was the objective response rate (ORR). 64-100% was the disease control rate (DCR). The time span for the answer varied from 6.4 to 16.7 months. The range of the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.2 to 17.5 months. The range of the median overall survival (OS) was 1.7-25.5 months. When comparing studies with single agent BRAF inhibitors to those reporting the results of BRAF plus MEK inhibitors, the response rates, duration of response, and survival were better in the former case. When untreated patients receiving BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy were compared to previously treated patients, the results were also improved. Hypertension, pyrexia, hyponatremia, neutropenia, dyspnoea, anaemia, abnormal liver function, asthenia, and cutaneous epidermoid carcinoma were among the frequently reported grade ≥3 toxicity.

Conclusions: Patients with advanced NSCLC that include a BRAF mutation have demonstrated encouraging clinical outcomes with a manageable safety profile when treated with BRAF inhibitors, either in combination with or without MEK inhibitor therapy. In patients who had not received treatment before, combination treatment produced greater results.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
276
期刊介绍: Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to educating health professionals about providing pharmaceutical care to patients with cancer. It is the official publication of the International Society for Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP). Publishing pertinent case reports and consensus guidelines...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信