Effect of traditional Chinese exercises on knee osteoarthritis: A network meta-analysis.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Meiling Lv, Jie Wang, Xin Chu, Weisi Zeng, Xiaoting Wen
{"title":"Effect of traditional Chinese exercises on knee osteoarthritis: A network meta-analysis.","authors":"Meiling Lv, Jie Wang, Xin Chu, Weisi Zeng, Xiaoting Wen","doi":"10.1177/10538127241290902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osteoarthritis is the third leading risk factor for disability in older adults.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy of different traditional Chinese exercises on knee osteoarthritis by network meta-analysis, and to provide a reference basis for patients to choose the best method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven databases, including Pubmed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang, and China Science and Technology Journal Database were searched for literature on traditional Chinese exercise to improve the symptoms of patients with knee osteoarthritis. The search period was from inception of the database until February 14, 2024. Literature screening and data extraction were carried out independently by 2 investigators, and the quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 assessment tool. R4.2.3 and Stata 15.0 were used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-two studies involving 2843 patients were ultimately included, encompassing 4 kinds of traditional Chinese exercise. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) showed that Baduanjin was the best traditional Chinese exercises for Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index scores including pain score (SUCRA = 0.85), stiffness score (SUCRA = 0.87), physical function score (SUCRA = 0.88) and overall score (SUCRA = 0.83). For Visual Analog Scale pain score, the most effective traditional Chinese exercise was Tai Chi (SUCRA = 0.93).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The efficacy of Tai Chi, Baduanjin, Yijinjing, and Wuqinxi on knee osteoarthritis patients is superior to that of usual care. Baduanjin had the best effect in improving stiffness, physical function and overall score, and both Baduanjin and Tai Chi were the best options for improving pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":"38 1","pages":"48-62"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127241290902","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Osteoarthritis is the third leading risk factor for disability in older adults.

Objective: To compare the efficacy of different traditional Chinese exercises on knee osteoarthritis by network meta-analysis, and to provide a reference basis for patients to choose the best method.

Methods: Seven databases, including Pubmed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang, and China Science and Technology Journal Database were searched for literature on traditional Chinese exercise to improve the symptoms of patients with knee osteoarthritis. The search period was from inception of the database until February 14, 2024. Literature screening and data extraction were carried out independently by 2 investigators, and the quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 assessment tool. R4.2.3 and Stata 15.0 were used for analysis.

Results: Forty-two studies involving 2843 patients were ultimately included, encompassing 4 kinds of traditional Chinese exercise. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) showed that Baduanjin was the best traditional Chinese exercises for Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index scores including pain score (SUCRA = 0.85), stiffness score (SUCRA = 0.87), physical function score (SUCRA = 0.88) and overall score (SUCRA = 0.83). For Visual Analog Scale pain score, the most effective traditional Chinese exercise was Tai Chi (SUCRA = 0.93).

Conclusion: The efficacy of Tai Chi, Baduanjin, Yijinjing, and Wuqinxi on knee osteoarthritis patients is superior to that of usual care. Baduanjin had the best effect in improving stiffness, physical function and overall score, and both Baduanjin and Tai Chi were the best options for improving pain.

中国传统运动对膝关节骨关节炎的影响:一项网络荟萃分析。
背景:骨关节炎是老年人致残的第三大危险因素。目的:通过网络meta分析,比较不同中医运动方式对膝关节骨性关节炎的疗效,为患者选择最佳方法提供参考依据。方法:检索Pubmed、Embase、The Cochrane Library、Web of Science、中国国家知识基础设施、万方、中国科技期刊库等7个数据库,检索有关中医运动改善膝关节骨性关节炎患者症状的文献。搜索周期从数据库建立到2024年2月14日。文献筛选和资料提取由2名研究者独立进行,采用Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0评估工具对纳入研究的质量进行评价。采用R4.2.3和Stata 15.0进行分析。结果:最终纳入42项研究,涉及2843例患者,包括4种中国传统运动。累积排名曲线下曲面(SUCRA)显示,八段筋是安大略省西部和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(Osteoarthritis Index)得分最佳的传统中式运动,包括疼痛评分(SUCRA = 0.85)、僵硬评分(SUCRA = 0.87)、身体功能评分(SUCRA = 0.88)和总分(SUCRA = 0.83)。对于视觉模拟量表疼痛评分,最有效的中国传统运动是太极拳(SUCRA = 0.93)。结论:太极拳、八段筋、益筋经、五芩喜治疗膝骨性关节炎的疗效优于常规护理。八段锦在改善僵硬度、身体机能和综合评分方面效果最好,而八段锦和太极拳在改善疼痛方面效果最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信