Kailun Zhuang, Jingyi Wu, Yusen Yang, Tianmo Bai, Baofeng Li
{"title":"Comparison of clinical efficacy between femoral neck system and cannulated screw in Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture: A meta-analysis.","authors":"Kailun Zhuang, Jingyi Wu, Yusen Yang, Tianmo Bai, Baofeng Li","doi":"10.1177/10538127241296340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, the femoral neck system (FNS) has become increasingly widely used for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We performed a meta-analysis to investigate the safety and efficacy of FNS and the mainstream internal fixation method, cannulated screw (CS), in the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched all research studies from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, WANFANG, and the Chinese Academic Journal Full-Text Database (CNKI) from 2018 to July 2024 and conducted data extraction. The study was conducted on July 26, 2024. We used the PRISMA guidelines to assess the quality of the results of all included studies. In addition, we searched for references to relevant articles. After completing the literature search, we performed a manual literature screening to obtain studies that met the inclusion criteria. The outcomes were Harris Hip Score, operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, healing time, and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-analysis ultimately included nine studies (n = 524) and conducted quality evaluations. All nine articles were retrospective cohort studies. The study exhibited statistically significant variations between the FNS and CS groups in relation to total complications (95% confidence interval (CI)= [0.11, 0.40], odds ratio (OR) = 0.21, P < 0.001), Harris Hip Score (95%CI = [2.14, 3.65], mean difference (MD) = 2.89, P < 0.001), Femoral head necrosis (95%CI = [0.17, 0.86], OR = 0.38, P = 0.02), Internal fixation failure (95%CI = [0.06, 0.50], OR = 0.17, P = 0.001), Medium femoral neck shortening (95%CI = [0.17, 0.53], OR = 0.30, P < 0.001), intraoperative blood loss (95%CI = [11.57, 26.80], MD = 19.19, P < 0.001), Operation duration (95%CI = [-15.20, -2.17], MD = -8.69, P = 0.009), and healing time (95%CI = [-1.30, -0.32], MD = -0.81, P = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis showed that in Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures, the femoral neck system has a shorter operative time, a lower rate of postoperative complications, a shorter healing time, less shortening of the femoral neck, and a higher Harris Hip Score compared with cannulated screws, but increases intraoperative blood loss. However, more clinical studies are needed to confirm our conclusions due to our small sample size and lack of randomized controlled trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":"38 1","pages":"71-82"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127241296340","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: In recent years, the femoral neck system (FNS) has become increasingly widely used for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.
Objective: We performed a meta-analysis to investigate the safety and efficacy of FNS and the mainstream internal fixation method, cannulated screw (CS), in the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.
Methods: We systematically searched all research studies from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, WANFANG, and the Chinese Academic Journal Full-Text Database (CNKI) from 2018 to July 2024 and conducted data extraction. The study was conducted on July 26, 2024. We used the PRISMA guidelines to assess the quality of the results of all included studies. In addition, we searched for references to relevant articles. After completing the literature search, we performed a manual literature screening to obtain studies that met the inclusion criteria. The outcomes were Harris Hip Score, operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, healing time, and postoperative complications.
Results: This meta-analysis ultimately included nine studies (n = 524) and conducted quality evaluations. All nine articles were retrospective cohort studies. The study exhibited statistically significant variations between the FNS and CS groups in relation to total complications (95% confidence interval (CI)= [0.11, 0.40], odds ratio (OR) = 0.21, P < 0.001), Harris Hip Score (95%CI = [2.14, 3.65], mean difference (MD) = 2.89, P < 0.001), Femoral head necrosis (95%CI = [0.17, 0.86], OR = 0.38, P = 0.02), Internal fixation failure (95%CI = [0.06, 0.50], OR = 0.17, P = 0.001), Medium femoral neck shortening (95%CI = [0.17, 0.53], OR = 0.30, P < 0.001), intraoperative blood loss (95%CI = [11.57, 26.80], MD = 19.19, P < 0.001), Operation duration (95%CI = [-15.20, -2.17], MD = -8.69, P = 0.009), and healing time (95%CI = [-1.30, -0.32], MD = -0.81, P = 0.001).
Conclusion: This meta-analysis showed that in Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures, the femoral neck system has a shorter operative time, a lower rate of postoperative complications, a shorter healing time, less shortening of the femoral neck, and a higher Harris Hip Score compared with cannulated screws, but increases intraoperative blood loss. However, more clinical studies are needed to confirm our conclusions due to our small sample size and lack of randomized controlled trials.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty.
In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.