Comparison of clinical efficacy between femoral neck system and cannulated screw in Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture: A meta-analysis.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Kailun Zhuang, Jingyi Wu, Yusen Yang, Tianmo Bai, Baofeng Li
{"title":"Comparison of clinical efficacy between femoral neck system and cannulated screw in Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture: A meta-analysis.","authors":"Kailun Zhuang, Jingyi Wu, Yusen Yang, Tianmo Bai, Baofeng Li","doi":"10.1177/10538127241296340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, the femoral neck system (FNS) has become increasingly widely used for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We performed a meta-analysis to investigate the safety and efficacy of FNS and the mainstream internal fixation method, cannulated screw (CS), in the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched all research studies from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, WANFANG, and the Chinese Academic Journal Full-Text Database (CNKI) from 2018 to July 2024 and conducted data extraction. The study was conducted on July 26, 2024. We used the PRISMA guidelines to assess the quality of the results of all included studies. In addition, we searched for references to relevant articles. After completing the literature search, we performed a manual literature screening to obtain studies that met the inclusion criteria. The outcomes were Harris Hip Score, operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, healing time, and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-analysis ultimately included nine studies (n = 524) and conducted quality evaluations. All nine articles were retrospective cohort studies. The study exhibited statistically significant variations between the FNS and CS groups in relation to total complications (95% confidence interval (CI)= [0.11, 0.40], odds ratio (OR) = 0.21, P < 0.001), Harris Hip Score (95%CI = [2.14, 3.65], mean difference (MD) = 2.89, P < 0.001), Femoral head necrosis (95%CI = [0.17, 0.86], OR = 0.38, P = 0.02), Internal fixation failure (95%CI = [0.06, 0.50], OR = 0.17, P = 0.001), Medium femoral neck shortening (95%CI = [0.17, 0.53], OR = 0.30, P < 0.001), intraoperative blood loss (95%CI = [11.57, 26.80], MD = 19.19, P < 0.001), Operation duration (95%CI = [-15.20, -2.17], MD = -8.69, P = 0.009), and healing time (95%CI = [-1.30, -0.32], MD = -0.81, P = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis showed that in Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures, the femoral neck system has a shorter operative time, a lower rate of postoperative complications, a shorter healing time, less shortening of the femoral neck, and a higher Harris Hip Score compared with cannulated screws, but increases intraoperative blood loss. However, more clinical studies are needed to confirm our conclusions due to our small sample size and lack of randomized controlled trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":"38 1","pages":"71-82"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127241296340","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In recent years, the femoral neck system (FNS) has become increasingly widely used for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.

Objective: We performed a meta-analysis to investigate the safety and efficacy of FNS and the mainstream internal fixation method, cannulated screw (CS), in the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.

Methods: We systematically searched all research studies from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, WANFANG, and the Chinese Academic Journal Full-Text Database (CNKI) from 2018 to July 2024 and conducted data extraction. The study was conducted on July 26, 2024. We used the PRISMA guidelines to assess the quality of the results of all included studies. In addition, we searched for references to relevant articles. After completing the literature search, we performed a manual literature screening to obtain studies that met the inclusion criteria. The outcomes were Harris Hip Score, operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, healing time, and postoperative complications.

Results: This meta-analysis ultimately included nine studies (n = 524) and conducted quality evaluations. All nine articles were retrospective cohort studies. The study exhibited statistically significant variations between the FNS and CS groups in relation to total complications (95% confidence interval (CI)= [0.11, 0.40], odds ratio (OR) = 0.21, P < 0.001), Harris Hip Score (95%CI = [2.14, 3.65], mean difference (MD) = 2.89, P < 0.001), Femoral head necrosis (95%CI = [0.17, 0.86], OR = 0.38, P = 0.02), Internal fixation failure (95%CI = [0.06, 0.50], OR = 0.17, P = 0.001), Medium femoral neck shortening (95%CI = [0.17, 0.53], OR = 0.30, P < 0.001), intraoperative blood loss (95%CI = [11.57, 26.80], MD = 19.19, P < 0.001), Operation duration (95%CI = [-15.20, -2.17], MD = -8.69, P = 0.009), and healing time (95%CI = [-1.30, -0.32], MD = -0.81, P = 0.001).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis showed that in Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures, the femoral neck system has a shorter operative time, a lower rate of postoperative complications, a shorter healing time, less shortening of the femoral neck, and a higher Harris Hip Score compared with cannulated screws, but increases intraoperative blood loss. However, more clinical studies are needed to confirm our conclusions due to our small sample size and lack of randomized controlled trials.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信