{"title":"Age-related differences on low back pain and lower extremity isokinetic muscle strength and balance.","authors":"Hazal Genç, Gamze Demircioğlu","doi":"10.1177/10538127241291310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background:: </strong>Given the growing population of the elderly, understanding how aging impacts pain, muscle strength, and balance, especially in individuals with chronic low back pain, is imperative.</p><p><strong>Objective:: </strong>This study aims to investigate age-related differences in lower extremity muscle strength and balance in patients with chronic low back pain.</p><p><strong>Methods:: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, 110 people with chronic low back pain were divided into two age groups (Group 1, age: 29.89 ± 6.82, Group 2, age: 51.42 ± 6.33). Both groups used Oswestry for low back pain and disability assessment, isokinetic device for muscle strength, and Biodex Balance System for balance assessment.</p><p><strong>Results:: </strong>There were no significant differences between groups in terms of pain (p = 0.426) or disability (p = 0.056). In contrast, significant differences were observed in isokinetic muscle strength: peak torque for the dominant side at 60°/s for quadriceps (p = 0.003) and hamstring (p = 0.007), and at 180°/s for hamstring (p = 0.012) and quadriceps (p = 0.011). The balance assessment revealed significant differences in fall risk (p = 0.004) and postural stability (p = 0.006) variables. The most significant regression association was found between dominant side 60°/s quadriceps and fall risk variables across age groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion:: </strong>Understanding age-related differences in muscle strength and balance among patients with chronic low back pain is critical. Customizing rehabilitation interventions improves efficacy and quality of life. Further research is necessary to optimize clinical approaches and elucidate underlying mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":"38 1","pages":"165-170"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127241291310","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background:: Given the growing population of the elderly, understanding how aging impacts pain, muscle strength, and balance, especially in individuals with chronic low back pain, is imperative.
Objective:: This study aims to investigate age-related differences in lower extremity muscle strength and balance in patients with chronic low back pain.
Methods:: In this cross-sectional study, 110 people with chronic low back pain were divided into two age groups (Group 1, age: 29.89 ± 6.82, Group 2, age: 51.42 ± 6.33). Both groups used Oswestry for low back pain and disability assessment, isokinetic device for muscle strength, and Biodex Balance System for balance assessment.
Results:: There were no significant differences between groups in terms of pain (p = 0.426) or disability (p = 0.056). In contrast, significant differences were observed in isokinetic muscle strength: peak torque for the dominant side at 60°/s for quadriceps (p = 0.003) and hamstring (p = 0.007), and at 180°/s for hamstring (p = 0.012) and quadriceps (p = 0.011). The balance assessment revealed significant differences in fall risk (p = 0.004) and postural stability (p = 0.006) variables. The most significant regression association was found between dominant side 60°/s quadriceps and fall risk variables across age groups.
Conclusion:: Understanding age-related differences in muscle strength and balance among patients with chronic low back pain is critical. Customizing rehabilitation interventions improves efficacy and quality of life. Further research is necessary to optimize clinical approaches and elucidate underlying mechanisms.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty.
In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.