The efficacy of manual therapy and therapeutic exercise for reducing chronic non-specific neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Dario Calafiore, Nicola Marotta, Umile Giuseppe Longo, Michele Vecchio, Roberta Zito, Lorenzo Lippi, Francesco Ferraro, Marco Invernizzi, Antonio Ammendolia, Alessandro de Sire
{"title":"The efficacy of manual therapy and therapeutic exercise for reducing chronic non-specific neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Dario Calafiore, Nicola Marotta, Umile Giuseppe Longo, Michele Vecchio, Roberta Zito, Lorenzo Lippi, Francesco Ferraro, Marco Invernizzi, Antonio Ammendolia, Alessandro de Sire","doi":"10.1177/10538127241304110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundChronic non-specific neck pain (CNSNP) is a highly prevalent musculoskeletal disorder associated with significant disability, resulting in growing recourse to healthcare providers, huge cost for society and a great number of workdays lost.ObjectiveBy this systematic review and metanalysis we aimed to assess the effects of different physical therapy techniques in patients with CNSNP.MethodsPubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were regularly used to search for articles published from 1<sup>st</sup> January 2010 until 31<sup>st</sup> January 2024. All RCTs were assessed for eligibility, including studies on: patients with diagnosis of CNSNP; physical therapy approaches such as manual therapy (MT) and therapeutic exercise (TE); waiting list, sham treatments, as comparison; Visual Analogue Scale, Numerical Rating Scale, Numerical Pain Rating Scale, and Numerical Pain Scale, as outcomes.ResultsAt the end of the search, 14025 studies were identified. After the removal of duplicates, 10,852 were considered eligible according to title and abstract screening, while 10,557 papers were excluded after this process. Therefore; a total of 11 RCTs were included in this systematic review. A decrease of pain intensity was observed in all groups, albeit in patients being treated with TE and MT. Besides this, the combination of TE and MT demonstrated a 91% of probability to be the best choice in patients with CNSNP at the first visit. Only the combination of TE plus MT/cognitive behavioral therapy and MT as a single treatment showed a reduction in pain score. Overall, 3 studies (27.2%) showed a low risk of bias, 6 (54.5%) showed some concerns in bias assessment, and 2 (19%) a high risk of bias.ConclusionCollectively, the findings of this systematic review showed that MT and TE might be considered as effective rehabilitation approaches for treatment of pain in patients with CNSNP.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"407-419"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127241304110","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundChronic non-specific neck pain (CNSNP) is a highly prevalent musculoskeletal disorder associated with significant disability, resulting in growing recourse to healthcare providers, huge cost for society and a great number of workdays lost.ObjectiveBy this systematic review and metanalysis we aimed to assess the effects of different physical therapy techniques in patients with CNSNP.MethodsPubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were regularly used to search for articles published from 1st January 2010 until 31st January 2024. All RCTs were assessed for eligibility, including studies on: patients with diagnosis of CNSNP; physical therapy approaches such as manual therapy (MT) and therapeutic exercise (TE); waiting list, sham treatments, as comparison; Visual Analogue Scale, Numerical Rating Scale, Numerical Pain Rating Scale, and Numerical Pain Scale, as outcomes.ResultsAt the end of the search, 14025 studies were identified. After the removal of duplicates, 10,852 were considered eligible according to title and abstract screening, while 10,557 papers were excluded after this process. Therefore; a total of 11 RCTs were included in this systematic review. A decrease of pain intensity was observed in all groups, albeit in patients being treated with TE and MT. Besides this, the combination of TE and MT demonstrated a 91% of probability to be the best choice in patients with CNSNP at the first visit. Only the combination of TE plus MT/cognitive behavioral therapy and MT as a single treatment showed a reduction in pain score. Overall, 3 studies (27.2%) showed a low risk of bias, 6 (54.5%) showed some concerns in bias assessment, and 2 (19%) a high risk of bias.ConclusionCollectively, the findings of this systematic review showed that MT and TE might be considered as effective rehabilitation approaches for treatment of pain in patients with CNSNP.

手工疗法和治疗性运动对减轻慢性非特异性颈部疼痛的疗效:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:慢性非特异性颈部疼痛(CNSNP)是一种高度流行的肌肉骨骼疾病,与重大残疾相关,导致越来越多的医疗保健提供者求助,社会成本巨大,大量工作日损失。目的:通过本系统综述和荟萃分析,我们旨在评估不同物理治疗技术对CNSNP患者的影响。方法:定期使用PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science数据库检索2010年1月1日至2024年1月31日发表的文章。对所有的随机对照试验进行资格评估,包括:诊断为CNSNP的患者;物理治疗方法,如手工治疗(MT)和治疗性运动(TE);等候名单、假治疗、作为比较;视觉模拟量表,数值评定量表,数值疼痛评定量表和数值疼痛评定量表作为结果。结果:在检索结束时,确定了14025项研究。删除重复后,根据标题和摘要筛选,10852篇论文被认为符合条件,10557篇论文被排除。因此;本系统综述共纳入11项随机对照试验。尽管在接受TE和MT治疗的患者中,所有组均观察到疼痛强度的降低。此外,在首次就诊时,TE和MT联合治疗的概率为91%,是CNSNP患者的最佳选择。只有TE + MT/认知行为治疗和MT作为单一治疗才能降低疼痛评分。总体而言,3项(27.2%)研究显示低偏倚风险,6项(54.5%)研究显示偏倚评估存在一些问题,2项(19%)研究显示高偏倚风险。结论:本系统综述的研究结果表明,MT和TE可能被认为是治疗CNSNP患者疼痛的有效康复方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信