Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe outcomes in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of European studies published up to 22 January 2024.

IF 9 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
European Respiratory Review Pub Date : 2025-02-19 Print Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1183/16000617.0222-2024
Guiling Zhou, Nina Dael, Stefan Verweij, Spyros Balafas, Sumaira Mubarik, Katrien Oude Rengerink, Anna Maria Gerdina Pasmooij, Debbie van Baarle, Peter G M Mol, Geertruida H de Bock, Eelko Hak
{"title":"Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe outcomes in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of European studies published up to 22 January 2024.","authors":"Guiling Zhou, Nina Dael, Stefan Verweij, Spyros Balafas, Sumaira Mubarik, Katrien Oude Rengerink, Anna Maria Gerdina Pasmooij, Debbie van Baarle, Peter G M Mol, Geertruida H de Bock, Eelko Hak","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0222-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Up-to-date evidence from European studies on long-term vaccine effectiveness (VE) of COVID-19 vaccines is lacking. This review aimed to evaluate effectiveness and durability of primary vaccine series and boosters in preventing infection and severe outcomes in the European population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted systematic searches of PubMed and Embase up to 22 January 2024. We included observational studies that evaluated VE against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection or severe disease (hospitalisation, intensive care unit admission or death) for primary series and boosters in Europe. We applied a random-effects meta-analysis model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 33 studies and over 56 million participants. The overall VE of the complete primary series against infection with any SARS-CoV-2 variant was 70.7%. VE was lower for Omicron, at 26.1%, than for pre-Omicron strains, at 77.0%. Over time, VE against infection by any variant decreased from 68.9% to 38.9% after 6 months. Boosters restored VE to 76.4% and maintained at 58.4% after 3 months. The overall VE of a complete primary series for severe outcomes due to any variant was 87.4%, with 93.3% for pre-Omicron and 62.8% for Omicron strains. Protection against severe outcomes declined less than for infection. 6 months after the primary series, the vaccine still provided over 50% protection against severe outcomes caused by Omicron. Boosters restored VE to 87.9% and maintained at 78.5% after 3 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VE against SARS-CoV-2 infection declines markedly with time and Omicron variants. Protection against severe outcomes was more durable and resistant to viral mutation. Boosters restored protection, emphasising the need for timely booster vaccination for vulnerable populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"34 175","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11836669/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Respiratory Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0222-2024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Up-to-date evidence from European studies on long-term vaccine effectiveness (VE) of COVID-19 vaccines is lacking. This review aimed to evaluate effectiveness and durability of primary vaccine series and boosters in preventing infection and severe outcomes in the European population.

Methods: We conducted systematic searches of PubMed and Embase up to 22 January 2024. We included observational studies that evaluated VE against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection or severe disease (hospitalisation, intensive care unit admission or death) for primary series and boosters in Europe. We applied a random-effects meta-analysis model.

Results: We included 33 studies and over 56 million participants. The overall VE of the complete primary series against infection with any SARS-CoV-2 variant was 70.7%. VE was lower for Omicron, at 26.1%, than for pre-Omicron strains, at 77.0%. Over time, VE against infection by any variant decreased from 68.9% to 38.9% after 6 months. Boosters restored VE to 76.4% and maintained at 58.4% after 3 months. The overall VE of a complete primary series for severe outcomes due to any variant was 87.4%, with 93.3% for pre-Omicron and 62.8% for Omicron strains. Protection against severe outcomes declined less than for infection. 6 months after the primary series, the vaccine still provided over 50% protection against severe outcomes caused by Omicron. Boosters restored VE to 87.9% and maintained at 78.5% after 3 months.

Conclusion: VE against SARS-CoV-2 infection declines markedly with time and Omicron variants. Protection against severe outcomes was more durable and resistant to viral mutation. Boosters restored protection, emphasising the need for timely booster vaccination for vulnerable populations.

COVID-19疫苗对成人SARS-CoV-2感染的有效性和严重结局:对截至2024年1月22日发表的欧洲研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:缺乏来自欧洲关于COVID-19疫苗长期疫苗有效性(VE)研究的最新证据。本综述旨在评价一次疫苗系列和加强疫苗在预防欧洲人群感染和严重后果方面的有效性和持久性。方法:系统检索PubMed和Embase数据库至2024年1月22日。我们纳入了观察性研究,这些研究评估了VE对欧洲初级系列和增强系列的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)感染或严重疾病(住院、重症监护病房住院或死亡)的预防作用。我们采用随机效应荟萃分析模型。结果:我们纳入了33项研究,超过5600万参与者。对任何SARS-CoV-2变体感染的完整初级系列的总体VE为70.7%。Omicron菌株的VE为26.1%,低于前Omicron菌株的77.0%。随着时间的推移,VE对任何变异感染的抵抗率在6个月后从68.9%下降到38.9%。增强剂使VE恢复到76.4%,3个月后维持在58.4%。由于任何变异导致的严重后果的完整初级系列的总体VE为87.4%,其中前Omicron为93.3%,Omicron菌株为62.8%。预防严重后果的下降幅度小于预防感染的下降幅度。在初级系列疫苗接种6个月后,该疫苗仍然提供50%以上的保护,防止由Omicron引起的严重后果。增强剂使VE恢复到87.9%,3个月后维持在78.5%。结论:VE对SARS-CoV-2感染的抑制作用随时间和基因组变异而明显下降。对严重后果的保护更持久,对病毒突变更有抵抗力。增强疫苗恢复了保护作用,强调需要及时为脆弱人群加强接种疫苗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Respiratory Review
European Respiratory Review Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
1.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Respiratory Review (ERR) is an open-access journal published by the European Respiratory Society (ERS), serving as a vital resource for respiratory professionals by delivering updates on medicine, science, and surgery in the field. ERR features state-of-the-art review articles, editorials, correspondence, and summaries of recent research findings and studies covering a wide range of topics including COPD, asthma, pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung disease, lung cancer, tuberculosis, and pulmonary infections. Articles are published continuously and compiled into quarterly issues within a single annual volume.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信