Adverse event profiles of CDK4/6 inhibitors: a disproportionality analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1080/14740338.2025.2465852
Xiaojiang Tian, Lin Chen, Yonghong Chen, Ni Zhang
{"title":"Adverse event profiles of CDK4/6 inhibitors: a disproportionality analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.","authors":"Xiaojiang Tian, Lin Chen, Yonghong Chen, Ni Zhang","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2465852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The safety profile of CDK4/6 inhibitors has not yet been systemically analysed in the real world. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive understanding of AEs associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors using the FAERS database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>FAERS data (2014Q1 to 2022Q4) were searched for reports of all FDA-approved CDK4/6 inhibitors across all indications. We used the SMQ generalized search AEs on the PT level. Disproportionality analysis was used to detect safety signals by calculating RORs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within the standardized MedDRA queries, significant safety signals were found, including those for palbociclib [haematopoietic leukopenia, erythropenia], ribociclib [haematopoietic leukopenia , conduction defects], and abemaciclib [eosinophilic pneumonia, dehydration]. For AEs at the PT level, we found several significant blood and lymphatic system disorders for both palbociclib and ribociclib, such as abnormal full blood count and decreased white blood cell count for palbociclib and anisocytosis, neutropenia for ribociclib. Palbociclib also had high RORs for pseudocirrhosis, stomatitis, oral pain, and alopecia, while ribociclib had high RORs for electrocardiogram PR shortened, sinus arrhythmia, and blood bilirubin abnormal. However, the RORs were significant for abemaciclib in terms of diarrhoea, vena cava thrombosis, thrombophlebitis migrans and pneumonitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CDK4/6 inhibitors differed in their safety profile reports.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1329-1339"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2465852","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The safety profile of CDK4/6 inhibitors has not yet been systemically analysed in the real world. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive understanding of AEs associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors using the FAERS database.

Methods: FAERS data (2014Q1 to 2022Q4) were searched for reports of all FDA-approved CDK4/6 inhibitors across all indications. We used the SMQ generalized search AEs on the PT level. Disproportionality analysis was used to detect safety signals by calculating RORs.

Results: Within the standardized MedDRA queries, significant safety signals were found, including those for palbociclib [haematopoietic leukopenia, erythropenia], ribociclib [haematopoietic leukopenia , conduction defects], and abemaciclib [eosinophilic pneumonia, dehydration]. For AEs at the PT level, we found several significant blood and lymphatic system disorders for both palbociclib and ribociclib, such as abnormal full blood count and decreased white blood cell count for palbociclib and anisocytosis, neutropenia for ribociclib. Palbociclib also had high RORs for pseudocirrhosis, stomatitis, oral pain, and alopecia, while ribociclib had high RORs for electrocardiogram PR shortened, sinus arrhythmia, and blood bilirubin abnormal. However, the RORs were significant for abemaciclib in terms of diarrhoea, vena cava thrombosis, thrombophlebitis migrans and pneumonitis.

Conclusion: CDK4/6 inhibitors differed in their safety profile reports.

CDK4/6抑制剂的不良事件概况:FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库的歧化分析。
背景:细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6抑制剂(CDK4/6抑制剂)已经改变了HR+和HER2-晚期乳腺癌的治疗前景。CDK4/6抑制剂的安全性尚未在现实世界中进行系统分析。本研究旨在通过FAERS数据库全面了解与CDK4/6抑制剂相关的ae以及影响ae的因素。方法:检索FAERS数据(2014Q1 - 2022Q4),查找fda批准的所有适应症的CDK4/6抑制剂的报告。我们在基于病例报告的首选术语(PT)级别上使用标准化MedDRA查询(SMQ)广义搜索ae。在过滤重复报告后,使用歧化分析通过计算报告优势比(RORs)来检测安全信号。如果95%置信区间不包含空值,则认为报告具有统计显著性。结果:在标准化的MedDRA查询中,发现了显著的安全性信号,包括帕博西尼[造血白细胞减少症(ROR = 14.93)、红细胞减少症(ROR = 11.12)]、核素西尼[造血白细胞减少症(ROR = 10.81)、传导缺陷(ROR = 8.40)]和阿贝马西尼[嗜酸性肺炎(ROR = 7.86)、脱水(ROR = 5.88)]。对于PT水平的不良反应,我们发现帕博西尼和核博西尼都有一些明显的血液和淋巴系统疾病,如帕博西尼的全血细胞计数异常(ROR = 46.45)和白细胞计数下降(ROR = 33.13),核博西尼的细胞增多症(ROR = 54.84),中性粒细胞减少症(ROR = 14.88)。帕博西尼对假性肝硬化、口腔炎、口腔疼痛、脱发的RORs也较高,而核博西尼对心电图PR缩短、窦性心律失常、血胆红素异常的RORs也较高。然而,abemaciclib在腹泻(ROR = 15.06)、腔静脉血栓形成(ROR = 10.45)、血栓性移动性静脉炎(ROR = 27.08)和肺炎(ROR = 10.05)方面的ROR具有显著性。结论:CDK4/6抑制剂的安全性报告存在差异;例如,中性粒细胞减少主要发生在帕博西尼和核素西尼,腹泻和静脉血栓栓塞主要发生在阿贝马西尼,QTc延长主要发生在核素西尼。在临床实践中,需要根据患者的病情进行个体化给药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书