Evaluation of fracture lines in adolescent lumbar spondylolysis using MR bone imaging as an alternative to computed tomography.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Kohei Okuyama, Yasuchika Aoki, Yukio Matushita, Tuyoshi Toyooka, Takayuki Sakai, Shiro Sugiura, Seiji Ohtori, Satoru Nishikawa
{"title":"Evaluation of fracture lines in adolescent lumbar spondylolysis using MR bone imaging as an alternative to computed tomography.","authors":"Kohei Okuyama, Yasuchika Aoki, Yukio Matushita, Tuyoshi Toyooka, Takayuki Sakai, Shiro Sugiura, Seiji Ohtori, Satoru Nishikawa","doi":"10.1007/s00586-025-08698-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The diagnosis of adolescent lumbar spondylolysis typically requires computed tomography (CT) imaging; however, concerns regarding medical radiation exposure have emerged. With recent advancements in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), it has become possible to acquire CT-like images using an MR bone imaging approach. This study aimed to investigate whether MR bone imaging can be utilised as a substitute for CT in evaluating the fracture line in patients with adolescent spondylolysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 24 patients (28 levels) diagnosed with adolescent lumbar spondylolysis between June and August 2023. In addition to the usual MRI, MR bone imaging and CT scans of the affected area were performed. Two raters evaluated the fracture lines on sagittal images and determined their presence or absence. For statistical analysis, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MR bone imaging using CT as the reference standard. Furthermore, we assessed intra- and inter-observer agreement using Cohen's Kappa coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 42 fractured pars and 14 non-fractured pars interarticularis controls. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MR bone imaging were 0.846, 1.00, and 0.893, respectively, for rater A and 0.789, 1.00, and 0.857, respectively, for rater B. The intra-observer agreement rates were 0.841 and 0.769 for raters A and B, respectively. Inter-observer agreement rates were 1.00 for CT and 0.875 for MR bone imaging.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results show that MR bone imaging can detect fracture lines in adolescent lumbar spondylosis at a level comparable to that of CT in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-08698-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The diagnosis of adolescent lumbar spondylolysis typically requires computed tomography (CT) imaging; however, concerns regarding medical radiation exposure have emerged. With recent advancements in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), it has become possible to acquire CT-like images using an MR bone imaging approach. This study aimed to investigate whether MR bone imaging can be utilised as a substitute for CT in evaluating the fracture line in patients with adolescent spondylolysis.

Methods: We included 24 patients (28 levels) diagnosed with adolescent lumbar spondylolysis between June and August 2023. In addition to the usual MRI, MR bone imaging and CT scans of the affected area were performed. Two raters evaluated the fracture lines on sagittal images and determined their presence or absence. For statistical analysis, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MR bone imaging using CT as the reference standard. Furthermore, we assessed intra- and inter-observer agreement using Cohen's Kappa coefficient.

Results: This study included 42 fractured pars and 14 non-fractured pars interarticularis controls. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MR bone imaging were 0.846, 1.00, and 0.893, respectively, for rater A and 0.789, 1.00, and 0.857, respectively, for rater B. The intra-observer agreement rates were 0.841 and 0.769 for raters A and B, respectively. Inter-observer agreement rates were 1.00 for CT and 0.875 for MR bone imaging.

Conclusion: Our results show that MR bone imaging can detect fracture lines in adolescent lumbar spondylosis at a level comparable to that of CT in clinical settings.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信