Timing of circulating tumor DNA analysis aimed at guiding adjuvant treatment in colorectal cancer.

IF 10 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Tenna V Henriksen, Christina Demuth, Amanda Frydendahl, Jesper Nors, Marijana Nesic, Mads H Rasmussen, Ole H Larsen, Claudia Jaensch, Uffe S Løve, Per V Andersen, Thomas Kolbro, Ole Thorlacius-Ussing, Alessio Monti, Jeppe Kildsig, Peter Bondeven, Nis H Schlesinger, Lene H Iversen, Kåre A Gotschalck, Claus L Andersen
{"title":"Timing of circulating tumor DNA analysis aimed at guiding adjuvant treatment in colorectal cancer.","authors":"Tenna V Henriksen, Christina Demuth, Amanda Frydendahl, Jesper Nors, Marijana Nesic, Mads H Rasmussen, Ole H Larsen, Claudia Jaensch, Uffe S Løve, Per V Andersen, Thomas Kolbro, Ole Thorlacius-Ussing, Alessio Monti, Jeppe Kildsig, Peter Bondeven, Nis H Schlesinger, Lene H Iversen, Kåre A Gotschalck, Claus L Andersen","doi":"10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-3200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple clinical trials investigate circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to guide adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in colorectal cancer. Timely ACT initiation necessitates early ctDNA testing, but the impact of postoperative cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and ctDNA dynamics remains unclear, particularly with cost-reducing input caps employed in some assays. This study investigates ctDNA detection at day14 versus day30, comparing whole-sample analysis with capping the cfDNA input, and evaluates single and dual timepoint assessments for ACT allocation.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In 2019-2023, 611 stage I-III colorectal cancer patients were enrolled. Blood was collected preoperatively, and postoperatively ~day14 and ~day30. The cfDNA levels were assessed using digital PCR, and ctDNA using tumor-informed digital PCR or targeted sequencing analyzing all cfDNA from 8mL of plasma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite elevated cfDNA in 85% of day14 samples, performance was comparable between the two timepoints (sensitivity 31% vs 32%; specificity both 98%). A 50ng cfDNA input cap reduced ctDNA detection probability, impacting 78% of day14 samples and 65% of day30 samples. At both timepoints, ctDNA detection was prognostic of recurrence (day14: HR=9.0, 95%CI 5.5-14.8; day30: HR=12.5, 95%CI 7.6-20.4). In 74% of ctDNA-positive recurrence patients, both samples had ctDNA detected. An increase in ctDNA level from day14 to day30 was associated with shorter time to recurrence (Pearson R=-0.63, P=0.003). Combining the timepoints would increase sensitivity (36%) and allow earlier ACT start in 80% of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early ctDNA sampling is feasible and highly prognostic. Supplemental later testing may improve sensitivity while allowing early ACT initiation for most ctDNA positive patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-3200","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multiple clinical trials investigate circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to guide adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in colorectal cancer. Timely ACT initiation necessitates early ctDNA testing, but the impact of postoperative cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and ctDNA dynamics remains unclear, particularly with cost-reducing input caps employed in some assays. This study investigates ctDNA detection at day14 versus day30, comparing whole-sample analysis with capping the cfDNA input, and evaluates single and dual timepoint assessments for ACT allocation.

Patients and methods: In 2019-2023, 611 stage I-III colorectal cancer patients were enrolled. Blood was collected preoperatively, and postoperatively ~day14 and ~day30. The cfDNA levels were assessed using digital PCR, and ctDNA using tumor-informed digital PCR or targeted sequencing analyzing all cfDNA from 8mL of plasma.

Results: Despite elevated cfDNA in 85% of day14 samples, performance was comparable between the two timepoints (sensitivity 31% vs 32%; specificity both 98%). A 50ng cfDNA input cap reduced ctDNA detection probability, impacting 78% of day14 samples and 65% of day30 samples. At both timepoints, ctDNA detection was prognostic of recurrence (day14: HR=9.0, 95%CI 5.5-14.8; day30: HR=12.5, 95%CI 7.6-20.4). In 74% of ctDNA-positive recurrence patients, both samples had ctDNA detected. An increase in ctDNA level from day14 to day30 was associated with shorter time to recurrence (Pearson R=-0.63, P=0.003). Combining the timepoints would increase sensitivity (36%) and allow earlier ACT start in 80% of patients.

Conclusion: Early ctDNA sampling is feasible and highly prognostic. Supplemental later testing may improve sensitivity while allowing early ACT initiation for most ctDNA positive patients.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
20.10
自引率
1.70%
发文量
1207
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Cancer Research is a journal focusing on groundbreaking research in cancer, specifically in the areas where the laboratory and the clinic intersect. Our primary interest lies in clinical trials that investigate novel treatments, accompanied by research on pharmacology, molecular alterations, and biomarkers that can predict response or resistance to these treatments. Furthermore, we prioritize laboratory and animal studies that explore new drugs and targeted agents with the potential to advance to clinical trials. We also encourage research on targetable mechanisms of cancer development, progression, and metastasis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信