Timing of ctDNA Analysis Aimed at Guiding Adjuvant Treatment in Colorectal Cancer.

IF 10 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Tenna V Henriksen, Christina Demuth, Amanda Frydendahl, Jesper Nors, Marijana Nesic, Mads H Rasmussen, Ole H Larsen, Claudia Jaensch, Uffe S Løve, Per V Andersen, Thomas Kolbro, Ole Thorlacius-Ussing, Alessio Monti, Jeppe Kildsig, Peter Bondeven, Nis H Schlesinger, Lene H Iversen, Kåre A Gotschalck, Claus L Andersen
{"title":"Timing of ctDNA Analysis Aimed at Guiding Adjuvant Treatment in Colorectal Cancer.","authors":"Tenna V Henriksen, Christina Demuth, Amanda Frydendahl, Jesper Nors, Marijana Nesic, Mads H Rasmussen, Ole H Larsen, Claudia Jaensch, Uffe S Løve, Per V Andersen, Thomas Kolbro, Ole Thorlacius-Ussing, Alessio Monti, Jeppe Kildsig, Peter Bondeven, Nis H Schlesinger, Lene H Iversen, Kåre A Gotschalck, Claus L Andersen","doi":"10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-3200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Multiple clinical trials are investigating ctDNA to guide adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in colorectal cancer. Timely ACT initiation necessitates early ctDNA testing, but the impact of postoperative cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and ctDNA dynamics remains unclear, particularly with cost-reducing input caps employed in some assays. This study investigates ctDNA detection at day 14 versus day 30, comparing whole-sample analysis with capping the cfDNA input, and evaluates single and dual timepoint assessments for ACT allocation.</p><p><strong>Experimental design: </strong>From 2019 to 2023, 611 patients with stage I to III colorectal cancer were enrolled. Blood was collected preoperatively and postoperatively on ∼day 14 and ∼day 30. The cfDNA levels were assessed using digital PCR, and ctDNA was assessed using tumor-informed digital PCR or targeted sequencing analyzing all cfDNA from 8 mL of plasma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite elevated cfDNA in 85% of day 14 samples, performance was comparable between the two timepoints (sensitivity, 31% vs. 32% and specificity, both 98%). A 50-ng cfDNA input cap reduced ctDNA detection probability, affecting 78% of day 14 samples and 65% of day 30 samples. At both timepoints, ctDNA detection was prognostic of recurrence (day 14; HR, 9.0, 95% confidence interval, 5.5-14.8 and day 30: HR, 12.5, 95% confidence interval, 7.6-20.4). In 74% of ctDNA-positive recurrence patients, both samples had ctDNA detected. An increase in the ctDNA level from day 14 to day 30 was associated with a shorter time to recurrence (Pearson R = -0.63, P = 0.003). Combining the timepoints would increase sensitivity (36%) and allow earlier ACT start in 80% of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early ctDNA sampling is feasible and highly prognostic. Supplemental later testing may improve sensitivity while allowing early ACT initiation for most ctDNA-positive patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":" ","pages":"1676-1685"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-3200","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Multiple clinical trials are investigating ctDNA to guide adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in colorectal cancer. Timely ACT initiation necessitates early ctDNA testing, but the impact of postoperative cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and ctDNA dynamics remains unclear, particularly with cost-reducing input caps employed in some assays. This study investigates ctDNA detection at day 14 versus day 30, comparing whole-sample analysis with capping the cfDNA input, and evaluates single and dual timepoint assessments for ACT allocation.

Experimental design: From 2019 to 2023, 611 patients with stage I to III colorectal cancer were enrolled. Blood was collected preoperatively and postoperatively on ∼day 14 and ∼day 30. The cfDNA levels were assessed using digital PCR, and ctDNA was assessed using tumor-informed digital PCR or targeted sequencing analyzing all cfDNA from 8 mL of plasma.

Results: Despite elevated cfDNA in 85% of day 14 samples, performance was comparable between the two timepoints (sensitivity, 31% vs. 32% and specificity, both 98%). A 50-ng cfDNA input cap reduced ctDNA detection probability, affecting 78% of day 14 samples and 65% of day 30 samples. At both timepoints, ctDNA detection was prognostic of recurrence (day 14; HR, 9.0, 95% confidence interval, 5.5-14.8 and day 30: HR, 12.5, 95% confidence interval, 7.6-20.4). In 74% of ctDNA-positive recurrence patients, both samples had ctDNA detected. An increase in the ctDNA level from day 14 to day 30 was associated with a shorter time to recurrence (Pearson R = -0.63, P = 0.003). Combining the timepoints would increase sensitivity (36%) and allow earlier ACT start in 80% of patients.

Conclusions: Early ctDNA sampling is feasible and highly prognostic. Supplemental later testing may improve sensitivity while allowing early ACT initiation for most ctDNA-positive patients.

循环肿瘤DNA分析的时机旨在指导结肠直肠癌的辅助治疗。
背景:多项临床试验探讨循环肿瘤DNA (ctDNA)对大肠癌辅助化疗(ACT)的指导作用。及时启动ACT需要早期进行ctDNA检测,但术后游离细胞DNA (cfDNA)和ctDNA动态的影响尚不清楚,特别是在一些检测中采用了降低成本的输入上限。本研究调查了第14天和第30天的ctDNA检测,比较了全样本分析和限制cfDNA输入,并评估了ACT分配的单时间点和双时间点评估。患者和方法:2019-2023年,纳入611例I-III期结直肠癌患者。术前、术后~ 14d、~ 30d采血。使用数字PCR评估cfDNA水平,使用肿瘤信息数字PCR或靶向测序分析8mL血浆中的所有cfDNA。结果:尽管在第14天85%的样本中cfDNA升高,但两个时间点之间的性能是可比的(灵敏度31% vs 32%;特异性均为98%)。50ng cfDNA输入上限降低了ctDNA的检测概率,影响了第14天样品的78%和第30天样品的65%。在这两个时间点,ctDNA检测是复发的预后(第14天:HR=9.0, 95%CI 5.5-14.8;第30天:HR=12.5, 95%CI 7.6-20.4)。在74%的ctDNA阳性复发患者中,两种样本均检测到ctDNA。从第14天到第30天,ctDNA水平升高与较短的复发时间相关(Pearson R=-0.63, P=0.003)。结合时间点将增加敏感性(36%),并允许80%的患者更早开始ACT治疗。结论:早期ctDNA取样是可行的,具有很高的预后价值。补充的后期检测可以提高敏感性,同时允许大多数ctDNA阳性患者早期启动ACT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
20.10
自引率
1.70%
发文量
1207
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Cancer Research is a journal focusing on groundbreaking research in cancer, specifically in the areas where the laboratory and the clinic intersect. Our primary interest lies in clinical trials that investigate novel treatments, accompanied by research on pharmacology, molecular alterations, and biomarkers that can predict response or resistance to these treatments. Furthermore, we prioritize laboratory and animal studies that explore new drugs and targeted agents with the potential to advance to clinical trials. We also encourage research on targetable mechanisms of cancer development, progression, and metastasis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信