Own-gender bias in facial feature recognition yields sex differences in holistic face processing.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Tobias Hausinger, Björn Probst, Stefan Hawelka, Belinda Pletzer
{"title":"Own-gender bias in facial feature recognition yields sex differences in holistic face processing.","authors":"Tobias Hausinger, Björn Probst, Stefan Hawelka, Belinda Pletzer","doi":"10.1186/s13293-025-00695-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Female observers in their luteal cycle phase exhibit a bias towards a detail-oriented rather than global visuospatial processing style that is well-documented across cognitive domains such as pattern recognition, navigation, and object location memory. Holistic face processing involves an integration of global patterns and local parts into a cohesive percept and might thus be susceptible to the influence of sex and cycle-related processing styles. This study aims to investigate potential sex differences in the part-whole effect as a measure a of holistic face processing and explores possible relationships with sex hormone levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>147 participants (74 male, 51 luteal, 22 non-luteal) performed a part-whole face recognition task while being controlled for cycle phase and sex hormone status. Eye tracking was used for fixation control and recording of fixation patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found significant sex differences in the part-whole effect between male and luteal phase female participants. In particular, this sex difference was based on luteal phase participants exhibiting higher face part recognition accuracy than male participants. This advantage was exclusively observed for stimulus faces of women. Exploratory analyses further suggest a similar advantage of luteal compared to non-luteal participants, but no significant difference between non-luteal and male participants. Furthermore, testosterone emerged as a possible mediator for the observed sex differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest a possible modulation of face encoding and/or recognition by sex and hormone status. Moreover, the established own-gender bias in face recognition, that is, female advantage in recognition of faces of the same gender might be based on more accurate representations of face-parts.</p>","PeriodicalId":8890,"journal":{"name":"Biology of Sex Differences","volume":"16 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11841357/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology of Sex Differences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-025-00695-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Female observers in their luteal cycle phase exhibit a bias towards a detail-oriented rather than global visuospatial processing style that is well-documented across cognitive domains such as pattern recognition, navigation, and object location memory. Holistic face processing involves an integration of global patterns and local parts into a cohesive percept and might thus be susceptible to the influence of sex and cycle-related processing styles. This study aims to investigate potential sex differences in the part-whole effect as a measure a of holistic face processing and explores possible relationships with sex hormone levels.

Methods: 147 participants (74 male, 51 luteal, 22 non-luteal) performed a part-whole face recognition task while being controlled for cycle phase and sex hormone status. Eye tracking was used for fixation control and recording of fixation patterns.

Results: We found significant sex differences in the part-whole effect between male and luteal phase female participants. In particular, this sex difference was based on luteal phase participants exhibiting higher face part recognition accuracy than male participants. This advantage was exclusively observed for stimulus faces of women. Exploratory analyses further suggest a similar advantage of luteal compared to non-luteal participants, but no significant difference between non-luteal and male participants. Furthermore, testosterone emerged as a possible mediator for the observed sex differences.

Conclusion: Our results suggest a possible modulation of face encoding and/or recognition by sex and hormone status. Moreover, the established own-gender bias in face recognition, that is, female advantage in recognition of faces of the same gender might be based on more accurate representations of face-parts.

面部特征识别中的自身性别偏见导致整体面部处理中的性别差异。
在黄体周期阶段的女性观察者表现出对细节导向的偏好,而不是整体的视觉空间处理风格,这在模式识别、导航和物体定位记忆等认知领域都有充分的证据。整体面部处理涉及将整体模式和局部部分整合成一个内聚感知,因此可能容易受到性别和周期相关处理风格的影响。本研究旨在探讨部分-整体效应中潜在的性别差异,并探讨其与性激素水平的关系。方法:147名受试者(男性74人,黄体体51人,非黄体体22人)在控制生理周期和性激素水平的情况下进行部分-整体面部识别任务。采用眼动法进行注视控制和注视模式记录。结果:我们发现男性和黄体期女性参与者在部分-整体效应上存在显著的性别差异。特别是,这种性别差异是基于黄体期参与者比男性参与者表现出更高的面部部分识别准确性。这一优势只在女性的刺激面孔上被观察到。探索性分析进一步表明,与非黄体参与者相比,黄体具有类似的优势,但非黄体参与者与男性参与者之间没有显着差异。此外,睾酮可能是观察到的性别差异的中介。结论:我们的研究结果表明,性别和激素状态可能调节面部编码和/或识别。此外,在人脸识别中已确立的自身性别偏见,即女性在识别同性面孔方面的优势,可能是基于对面部部位更准确的表征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biology of Sex Differences
Biology of Sex Differences ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-GENETICS & HEREDITY
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
1.30%
发文量
69
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Biology of Sex Differences is a unique scientific journal focusing on sex differences in physiology, behavior, and disease from molecular to phenotypic levels, incorporating both basic and clinical research. The journal aims to enhance understanding of basic principles and facilitate the development of therapeutic and diagnostic tools specific to sex differences. As an open-access journal, it is the official publication of the Organization for the Study of Sex Differences and co-published by the Society for Women's Health Research. Topical areas include, but are not limited to sex differences in: genomics; the microbiome; epigenetics; molecular and cell biology; tissue biology; physiology; interaction of tissue systems, in any system including adipose, behavioral, cardiovascular, immune, muscular, neural, renal, and skeletal; clinical studies bearing on sex differences in disease or response to therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信