Centering Latinx immigrant knowledge for wellbeing, liberation, and justice in community-university research partnerships.

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Susana Echeverri Herrera, Bianca Ruiz-Negrón, Alejandra Lemus, Cirila Estela Vasquez Guzmán, Julia Meredith Hess, Janet Ramírez, Sonia Ramírez, Norma Casas, Margarita Galvis, Ivonne Aguirre, Jessica R Goodkind
{"title":"Centering Latinx immigrant knowledge for wellbeing, liberation, and justice in community-university research partnerships.","authors":"Susana Echeverri Herrera, Bianca Ruiz-Negrón, Alejandra Lemus, Cirila Estela Vasquez Guzmán, Julia Meredith Hess, Janet Ramírez, Sonia Ramírez, Norma Casas, Margarita Galvis, Ivonne Aguirre, Jessica R Goodkind","doi":"10.1002/ajcp.12782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Structural inequities impacting immigrant health in the United States were intensified during two recent time periods-the anti-immigrant socio-political context of 2017-2021 and the COVID-19 pandemic beginning in 2020. Our community-university research team adapted and implemented a community-based mental health intervention with Latinx immigrants during these periods, which allowed us to reflect on the role of our community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnership in addressing the disparate impacts of these events on Latinx immigrants. We documented the factors and processes that enabled our partnership to navigate crises, address immediate needs, and promote long-term social change. We analyzed focus groups with community-based organization staff, research team meetings, retreat notes, and interviews with Latinx immigrants. Exacerbated challenges included fear, uncertainty, limited resources, and restricted mobility and isolation. By prioritizing immigrant individual, community, and organizational knowledge and epistemologies, our team built upon immigrants' experiences of survival and resistance in the face of ongoing exclusion to navigate the difficulties of both periods. Instead of developing reactive processes, our partnership centered on immigrants' existing strategies, ensuring responses were rapid, effective, and aligned with community needs. These findings highlight that immigrant communities survive continual \"crises\" and engage in ongoing resistance and survival strategies that can provide the basis for effective CBPR and other social change efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":7576,"journal":{"name":"American journal of community psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of community psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12782","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Structural inequities impacting immigrant health in the United States were intensified during two recent time periods-the anti-immigrant socio-political context of 2017-2021 and the COVID-19 pandemic beginning in 2020. Our community-university research team adapted and implemented a community-based mental health intervention with Latinx immigrants during these periods, which allowed us to reflect on the role of our community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnership in addressing the disparate impacts of these events on Latinx immigrants. We documented the factors and processes that enabled our partnership to navigate crises, address immediate needs, and promote long-term social change. We analyzed focus groups with community-based organization staff, research team meetings, retreat notes, and interviews with Latinx immigrants. Exacerbated challenges included fear, uncertainty, limited resources, and restricted mobility and isolation. By prioritizing immigrant individual, community, and organizational knowledge and epistemologies, our team built upon immigrants' experiences of survival and resistance in the face of ongoing exclusion to navigate the difficulties of both periods. Instead of developing reactive processes, our partnership centered on immigrants' existing strategies, ensuring responses were rapid, effective, and aligned with community needs. These findings highlight that immigrant communities survive continual "crises" and engage in ongoing resistance and survival strategies that can provide the basis for effective CBPR and other social change efforts.

在社区大学研究伙伴关系中,以拉丁移民的福祉,解放和正义知识为中心。
在最近的两个时期——2017-2021年的反移民社会政治背景和2020年开始的COVID-19大流行——影响美国移民健康的结构性不平等加剧。在这些时期,我们的社区大学研究团队对拉丁裔移民进行了调整和实施了基于社区的心理健康干预,这使我们能够反思我们基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)伙伴关系在解决这些事件对拉丁裔移民的不同影响方面的作用。我们记录了使我们的伙伴关系能够应对危机、解决当前需求和促进长期社会变革的因素和过程。我们分析了以社区为基础的组织人员的焦点小组、研究小组会议、撤退笔记和对拉丁裔移民的采访。加剧的挑战包括恐惧、不确定性、资源有限、行动受限和孤立。通过优先考虑移民个人、社区和组织的知识和认识论,我们的团队建立在移民面对持续排斥的生存和抵抗经验的基础上,以应对这两个时期的困难。我们的合作伙伴关系以移民的现有策略为中心,确保反应迅速、有效,并与社区需求保持一致,而不是发展被动的过程。这些发现强调了移民社区在持续的“危机”中幸存下来,并参与持续的抵抗和生存策略,这可以为有效的CBPR和其他社会变革努力提供基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
9.70%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Community Psychology publishes original quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research; theoretical papers; empirical reviews; reports of innovative community programs or policies; and first person accounts of stakeholders involved in research, programs, or policy. The journal encourages submissions of innovative multi-level research and interventions, and encourages international submissions. The journal also encourages the submission of manuscripts concerned with underrepresented populations and issues of human diversity. The American Journal of Community Psychology publishes research, theory, and descriptions of innovative interventions on a wide range of topics, including, but not limited to: individual, family, peer, and community mental health, physical health, and substance use; risk and protective factors for health and well being; educational, legal, and work environment processes, policies, and opportunities; social ecological approaches, including the interplay of individual family, peer, institutional, neighborhood, and community processes; social welfare, social justice, and human rights; social problems and social change; program, system, and policy evaluations; and, understanding people within their social, cultural, economic, geographic, and historical contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信