Efficacy of nasal clips combined with nasal cannulas in preventing hypoxemia during gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Rui Lu, Haifei Xiang, Minshu Zhu, Yan Cao, Xiandong Shao, Guo Yu, Tao-Hsin Tung, Wenjie Du, Lingyang Chen, Jianbin Cao, Mingcang Wang
{"title":"Efficacy of nasal clips combined with nasal cannulas in preventing hypoxemia during gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Rui Lu, Haifei Xiang, Minshu Zhu, Yan Cao, Xiandong Shao, Guo Yu, Tao-Hsin Tung, Wenjie Du, Lingyang Chen, Jianbin Cao, Mingcang Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12871-024-02863-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation is frequently complicated by hypoxemia. Nasal cannulas have limitations in eliminating hypoxemia. We hypothesized that the combination of nasal clips and nasal cannulas would improve the inspired oxygen concentrations and prevent hypoxemia compared with the use of nasal cannulas alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 600 adult patients were randomly assigned to receive supplemental oxygen through single-lumen nasal cannulas or through the combination of nasal clips and nasal cannulas. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypoxemia. Additionally, subclinical respiratory depression and severe hypoxemia, duration of hypoxemia, lowest SpO<sub>2</sub> level, measures to increase oxygen saturation level, and adverse events such as cough and hiccups were compared as secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred patients in the nasal clip group and 296 patients in the nasal cannula group were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Nasal clips significantly decreased the incidence of hypoxemia from 25.0-17.7%(RR = 0.707, 95% CI = 0.516 to 0.967, P = 0.029). The median and interquartile range of lowest SpO<sub>2</sub> in the nasal clip group (96 [92 to 98]) was significantly greater than that in the nasal cannula group (95 [89 to 97]; median difference = 1.000, 95% CI = 0.000 to 2.000, P = 0.004). No significant differences were found between the two groups in subclinical respiratory depression or severe hypoxemia, duration of hypoxemia, adverse events or measures taken to increase oxygen saturation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of nasal clips and cannulas reduces hypoxemia during gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation, demonstrating a significant advantage over the sole use of nasal cannulas, with tolerable adverse events.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200065407).</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"83"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837456/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02863-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation is frequently complicated by hypoxemia. Nasal cannulas have limitations in eliminating hypoxemia. We hypothesized that the combination of nasal clips and nasal cannulas would improve the inspired oxygen concentrations and prevent hypoxemia compared with the use of nasal cannulas alone.

Methods: A total of 600 adult patients were randomly assigned to receive supplemental oxygen through single-lumen nasal cannulas or through the combination of nasal clips and nasal cannulas. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypoxemia. Additionally, subclinical respiratory depression and severe hypoxemia, duration of hypoxemia, lowest SpO2 level, measures to increase oxygen saturation level, and adverse events such as cough and hiccups were compared as secondary outcomes.

Results: Three hundred patients in the nasal clip group and 296 patients in the nasal cannula group were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Nasal clips significantly decreased the incidence of hypoxemia from 25.0-17.7%(RR = 0.707, 95% CI = 0.516 to 0.967, P = 0.029). The median and interquartile range of lowest SpO2 in the nasal clip group (96 [92 to 98]) was significantly greater than that in the nasal cannula group (95 [89 to 97]; median difference = 1.000, 95% CI = 0.000 to 2.000, P = 0.004). No significant differences were found between the two groups in subclinical respiratory depression or severe hypoxemia, duration of hypoxemia, adverse events or measures taken to increase oxygen saturation.

Conclusions: The combination of nasal clips and cannulas reduces hypoxemia during gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation, demonstrating a significant advantage over the sole use of nasal cannulas, with tolerable adverse events.

Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200065407).

鼻夹联合鼻插管预防镇静胃肠道内镜检查时低氧血症的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
背景:镇静胃肠道内窥镜检查经常并发低氧血症。鼻插管在消除低氧血症方面有局限性。我们假设鼻夹和鼻插管联合使用比单独使用鼻插管更能提高吸入氧浓度,防止低氧血症。方法:随机选取600例成人患者,分别采用单腔鼻插管或鼻夹与鼻插管联合吸氧。主要终点是低氧血症的发生率。此外,亚临床呼吸抑制和严重低氧血症、低氧血症持续时间、最低SpO2水平、提高氧饱和度水平的措施以及咳嗽和打嗝等不良事件作为次要结局进行比较。结果:鼻夹组300例,鼻插管组296例纳入意向治疗分析。鼻夹可显著降低低氧血症的发生率,比值为25.0 ~ 17.7%(RR = 0.707, 95% CI = 0.516 ~ 0.967, P = 0.029)。鼻夹组最低SpO2的中位数和四分位数范围(96[92 ~ 98])均显著大于鼻插管组(95 [89 ~ 97]);中位数差异= 1.000,95% CI = 0.000 ~ 2.000, P = 0.004)。两组在亚临床呼吸抑制或严重低氧血症、低氧血症持续时间、不良事件或采取的提高氧饱和度措施方面均无显著差异。结论:鼻夹和鼻插管联合使用可减少镇静下胃肠内镜检查时的低氧血症,与单独使用鼻插管相比具有显著优势,不良事件可耐受。试验注册:中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR2200065407)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信