Evaluating geographic accessibility to COVID-19 vaccination across 54 countries/regions.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Yanjia Cao, Tianyu Li, Huanfa Chen, Qunshan Zhao, Jiashuo Sun, Karen Ann Grépin, Jeon-Young Kang
{"title":"Evaluating geographic accessibility to COVID-19 vaccination across 54 countries/regions.","authors":"Yanjia Cao, Tianyu Li, Huanfa Chen, Qunshan Zhao, Jiashuo Sun, Karen Ann Grépin, Jeon-Young Kang","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has revealed significant disparities in global vaccine accessibility, particularly affecting low and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, current research on COVID-19 vaccine accessibility primarily focuses on individual countries or high-income countries (HIC). We aimed to evaluate geographic accessibility to COVID-19 vaccination on a multicountry scale, covering comparisons across LMICs and HICs. Additionally, we explored the potential economic factors related to accessibility and their impacts on health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected population data at a 1 km resolution and geocoded all vaccination sites across the selected countries/regions. Four measures were used to evaluate vaccine accessibility from different perspectives: population coverage with varying travel time thresholds, driving time to vaccination sites, the number of sites within a 30-min threshold and a geographic accessibility index using enhanced two-step floating catchment area method. Finally, we explored the relationships between geographic accessibility and several factors: gross domestic product per capita, vaccination uptake and mortality.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We found substantial disparities in vaccine accessibility across the selected countries/regions. In 24.07% of these countries/regions, over 95% of the population can access the nearest vaccination services within 15 min. In contrast, in countries/regions such as Manitoba (Canada), Zimbabwe and Bhutan, less than 30% of the population can reach these sites within 60 min. Underserved areas, termed 'vaccine deserts', were identified in both HICs and LMICs. We found that countries/regions with higher vaccine accessibility tend to achieve higher vaccination rates, whereas those with lower vaccine accessibility are likely to experience substantial increases in COVID-19 mortality rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LMICs require enhanced attention to improve geographic accessibility to vaccination. Additionally, there are internal disparities in accessibility within both HICs and LMICs. National public health officials and global health initiatives are suggested to prioritize 'vaccine deserts' and to ensure equitable vaccine access in future pandemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11840912/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017761","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has revealed significant disparities in global vaccine accessibility, particularly affecting low and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, current research on COVID-19 vaccine accessibility primarily focuses on individual countries or high-income countries (HIC). We aimed to evaluate geographic accessibility to COVID-19 vaccination on a multicountry scale, covering comparisons across LMICs and HICs. Additionally, we explored the potential economic factors related to accessibility and their impacts on health outcomes.

Methods: We collected population data at a 1 km resolution and geocoded all vaccination sites across the selected countries/regions. Four measures were used to evaluate vaccine accessibility from different perspectives: population coverage with varying travel time thresholds, driving time to vaccination sites, the number of sites within a 30-min threshold and a geographic accessibility index using enhanced two-step floating catchment area method. Finally, we explored the relationships between geographic accessibility and several factors: gross domestic product per capita, vaccination uptake and mortality.

Findings: We found substantial disparities in vaccine accessibility across the selected countries/regions. In 24.07% of these countries/regions, over 95% of the population can access the nearest vaccination services within 15 min. In contrast, in countries/regions such as Manitoba (Canada), Zimbabwe and Bhutan, less than 30% of the population can reach these sites within 60 min. Underserved areas, termed 'vaccine deserts', were identified in both HICs and LMICs. We found that countries/regions with higher vaccine accessibility tend to achieve higher vaccination rates, whereas those with lower vaccine accessibility are likely to experience substantial increases in COVID-19 mortality rates.

Conclusion: LMICs require enhanced attention to improve geographic accessibility to vaccination. Additionally, there are internal disparities in accessibility within both HICs and LMICs. National public health officials and global health initiatives are suggested to prioritize 'vaccine deserts' and to ensure equitable vaccine access in future pandemics.

评估54个国家/地区COVID-19疫苗接种的地理可及性。
背景:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行揭示了全球疫苗可及性方面的巨大差异,特别是对低收入和中等收入国家的影响。然而,目前关于COVID-19疫苗可及性的研究主要集中在个别国家或高收入国家。我们的目的是在多国范围内评估COVID-19疫苗接种的地理可及性,包括中低收入国家和高收入国家之间的比较。此外,我们还探讨了与可及性相关的潜在经济因素及其对健康结果的影响。方法:我们以1公里分辨率收集人口数据,并对选定国家/地区的所有疫苗接种点进行地理编码。采用四项指标从不同角度评价疫苗可达性:不同出行时间阈值的人口覆盖率、到达疫苗接种点的驾车时间、30分钟阈值内的疫苗接种点数量和地理可达性指数(采用增强的两步浮动集水区法)。最后,我们探讨了地理可及性与几个因素之间的关系:人均国内生产总值、疫苗接种率和死亡率。研究结果:我们发现选定国家/地区在疫苗可及性方面存在巨大差异。在24.07%的这些国家/地区,95%以上的人口可在15分钟内获得最近的疫苗接种服务。相比之下,在马尼托巴(加拿大)、津巴布韦和不丹等国家/地区,不到30%的人口可以在60分钟内到达这些地点。在高收入国家和中低收入国家都确定了被称为“疫苗沙漠”的服务不足地区。我们发现,疫苗可及性较高的国家/地区的疫苗接种率往往较高,而疫苗可及性较低的国家/地区的COVID-19死亡率可能大幅上升。结论:中低收入国家需要加强关注,以改善疫苗接种的地理可及性。此外,高收入国家和中低收入国家在可及性方面存在内部差异。建议国家公共卫生官员和全球卫生倡议优先考虑“疫苗沙漠”,并确保在未来的大流行中公平获得疫苗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信