Harmonizing HTA Evidence Needs and Expectations: Challenges and Opportunities to Improve Evidence Generation, Ensure Access and Affordability

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Sarah K. Emond, Wim G. Goettsch, Daniel A. Ollendorf
{"title":"Harmonizing HTA Evidence Needs and Expectations: Challenges and Opportunities to Improve Evidence Generation, Ensure Access and Affordability","authors":"Sarah K. Emond,&nbsp;Wim G. Goettsch,&nbsp;Daniel A. Ollendorf","doi":"10.1002/cpt.3579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Conducting high-quality health technology assessments requires high-quality evidence. With evolving regulatory standards for faster approval of new pharmaceutical products, health technology practitioners often find that the evidence base available to inform their work is lacking. This review article provides case examples of how health technology assessors have grappled with this tension, from the United States and European perspective, including experiences with new therapies for large populations, such as Alzheimer's disease, and gene therapies for ultra-rare conditions. The article concludes by offering some potential policy solutions that can meet the goals of robust evidence generation, patient access, and system affordability, including reimbursement with evidence development, outcomes-based contracts, and other types of managed entry agreements.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"117 4","pages":"938-945"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpt.3579","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conducting high-quality health technology assessments requires high-quality evidence. With evolving regulatory standards for faster approval of new pharmaceutical products, health technology practitioners often find that the evidence base available to inform their work is lacking. This review article provides case examples of how health technology assessors have grappled with this tension, from the United States and European perspective, including experiences with new therapies for large populations, such as Alzheimer's disease, and gene therapies for ultra-rare conditions. The article concludes by offering some potential policy solutions that can meet the goals of robust evidence generation, patient access, and system affordability, including reimbursement with evidence development, outcomes-based contracts, and other types of managed entry agreements.

协调HTA证据需求和期望:改善证据生成、确保可及性和可负担性的挑战和机遇。
开展高质量的卫生技术评估需要高质量的证据。随着加快批准新药品的监管标准的不断发展,卫生技术从业人员经常发现缺乏可用于指导其工作的证据基础。这篇综述文章从美国和欧洲的角度提供了卫生技术评估人员如何应对这种紧张关系的案例,包括针对大量人群的新疗法(如阿尔茨海默病)和针对超罕见疾病的基因疗法的经验。文章最后提出了一些潜在的政策解决方案,这些解决方案可以实现强有力的证据生成、患者可及性和系统可负担性的目标,包括证据开发报销、基于结果的合同和其他类型的管理准入协议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.50%
发文量
290
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (CPT) is the authoritative cross-disciplinary journal in experimental and clinical medicine devoted to publishing advances in the nature, action, efficacy, and evaluation of therapeutics. CPT welcomes original Articles in the emerging areas of translational, predictive and personalized medicine; new therapeutic modalities including gene and cell therapies; pharmacogenomics, proteomics and metabolomics; bioinformation and applied systems biology complementing areas of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, human investigation and clinical trials, pharmacovigilence, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacometrics, and population pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信