‘Can be challenging but usually worth it!’: International survey of rehabilitation professionals' experiences of social media use after acquired brain injury

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Melissa (Liss) Brunner, Rachael Rietdijk, Petra Avramovic, Sophie Brassel, Kylie Southwell, Leanne Togher
{"title":"‘Can be challenging but usually worth it!’: International survey of rehabilitation professionals' experiences of social media use after acquired brain injury","authors":"Melissa (Liss) Brunner,&nbsp;Rachael Rietdijk,&nbsp;Petra Avramovic,&nbsp;Sophie Brassel,&nbsp;Kylie Southwell,&nbsp;Leanne Togher","doi":"10.1111/1460-6984.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>People with an acquired brain injury (ABI) can struggle to use social media after their injury, due to changes in their cognitive-communication skills, and would like help to improve their skills and connectivity. A focus group study in one Australian brain injury rehabilitation service recently found that ABI rehabilitation professionals are restrictive or reactive (rather than proactive) in their approach to supporting people in using social media after an ABI; however, it is unknown whether this finding reflects practice internationally.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To survey a larger international cohort of rehabilitation professionals working with people after ABI to understand their views and experiences of social media use after ABI and to explore ways of addressing social media use during rehabilitation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and Procedures</h3>\n \n <p>Participants were recruited via social media posts and email invitations between July 2020 and July 2022 to complete an online survey of 27 questions across three categories, ‘Demographic Information’ (5 questions), ‘Own social media use’ (12 questions), and ‘Perspectives on social media use after ABI’ (10 questions). Directed content analysis was used to explore and interpret the data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of the 83 rehabilitation professionals who responded to the survey, 68 data sets met eligibility criteria for analysis. Most respondents were aged between 25 and 55 years (86%), and practiced across Australia (53%), the United Kingdom (24%), the United States (16%), Canada (3%), the European Union (3%) and Asia (1%). Most were speech pathologists (68%), occupational therapists (9%) or clinical neuropsychologists (7%). The mean length of experience working with people with ABI was 14.3 years (SD = 10.6). Participants identified benefits in social media use during ABI rehabilitation for social connection and inclusion, whilst also highlighting the risks and their own limitations in knowledge and expertise. Clinical guidance, policy, funding and resources were recommended to support clinicians to successfully address social media goals during rehabilitation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Rehabilitation professionals recommend that social media use be routinely considered during rehabilitation after ABI and report that they need greater access to knowledge, expertise, resources and policy to support this in clinical practice. Addressing social media goals in rehabilitation was reported to be complex and challenging yet rewarding for all involved. Ongoing robust research is urgently required to give rehabilitation professionals an evidence-based framework and resources for assessment and intervention in this space.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS</h3>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> What is already known on the subject</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>People with an acquired brain injury (ABI) experience challenges in using social media safely and meaningfully after their injury. With little guidance available to support clinical practice, ABI rehabilitation clinicians feel uncertain in their approach to addressing social media goals and want greater access to knowledge, expertise and resources.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> What this paper adds to existing knowledge</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>This paper provides confirmation of previous work exploring how social media is addressed during rehabilitation and extends on our knowledge through surveying a larger cohort of international ABI rehabilitation professionals. Rehabilitation professionals report that inclusion in online communities is now central to many people's social and occupational endeavours and recommend that social media use be routinely considered during rehabilitation after ABI. When incorporating the use of social media into rehabilitation, clinicians report positive outcomes despite the complexity and challenges faced in doing so.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Respondents in this study suggested potential approaches and strategies for rehabilitation professionals to consider when supporting social media use after ABI. However, ongoing robust research is urgently required to give rehabilitation professionals an evidence-based framework and resources for assessment and intervention of social media communication skills after brain injury.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49182,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","volume":"60 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1460-6984.70011","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1460-6984.70011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

People with an acquired brain injury (ABI) can struggle to use social media after their injury, due to changes in their cognitive-communication skills, and would like help to improve their skills and connectivity. A focus group study in one Australian brain injury rehabilitation service recently found that ABI rehabilitation professionals are restrictive or reactive (rather than proactive) in their approach to supporting people in using social media after an ABI; however, it is unknown whether this finding reflects practice internationally.

Aim

To survey a larger international cohort of rehabilitation professionals working with people after ABI to understand their views and experiences of social media use after ABI and to explore ways of addressing social media use during rehabilitation.

Methods and Procedures

Participants were recruited via social media posts and email invitations between July 2020 and July 2022 to complete an online survey of 27 questions across three categories, ‘Demographic Information’ (5 questions), ‘Own social media use’ (12 questions), and ‘Perspectives on social media use after ABI’ (10 questions). Directed content analysis was used to explore and interpret the data.

Results

Of the 83 rehabilitation professionals who responded to the survey, 68 data sets met eligibility criteria for analysis. Most respondents were aged between 25 and 55 years (86%), and practiced across Australia (53%), the United Kingdom (24%), the United States (16%), Canada (3%), the European Union (3%) and Asia (1%). Most were speech pathologists (68%), occupational therapists (9%) or clinical neuropsychologists (7%). The mean length of experience working with people with ABI was 14.3 years (SD = 10.6). Participants identified benefits in social media use during ABI rehabilitation for social connection and inclusion, whilst also highlighting the risks and their own limitations in knowledge and expertise. Clinical guidance, policy, funding and resources were recommended to support clinicians to successfully address social media goals during rehabilitation.

Conclusion

Rehabilitation professionals recommend that social media use be routinely considered during rehabilitation after ABI and report that they need greater access to knowledge, expertise, resources and policy to support this in clinical practice. Addressing social media goals in rehabilitation was reported to be complex and challenging yet rewarding for all involved. Ongoing robust research is urgently required to give rehabilitation professionals an evidence-based framework and resources for assessment and intervention in this space.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

What is already known on the subject

  • People with an acquired brain injury (ABI) experience challenges in using social media safely and meaningfully after their injury. With little guidance available to support clinical practice, ABI rehabilitation clinicians feel uncertain in their approach to addressing social media goals and want greater access to knowledge, expertise and resources.

What this paper adds to existing knowledge

  • This paper provides confirmation of previous work exploring how social media is addressed during rehabilitation and extends on our knowledge through surveying a larger cohort of international ABI rehabilitation professionals. Rehabilitation professionals report that inclusion in online communities is now central to many people's social and occupational endeavours and recommend that social media use be routinely considered during rehabilitation after ABI. When incorporating the use of social media into rehabilitation, clinicians report positive outcomes despite the complexity and challenges faced in doing so.

What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?

  • Respondents in this study suggested potential approaches and strategies for rehabilitation professionals to consider when supporting social media use after ABI. However, ongoing robust research is urgently required to give rehabilitation professionals an evidence-based framework and resources for assessment and intervention of social media communication skills after brain injury.
“可能很有挑战性,但通常是值得的!”:对获得性脑损伤后康复专业人员社交媒体使用经历的国际调查
获得性脑损伤(ABI)患者在受伤后可能很难使用社交媒体,因为他们的认知沟通技能发生了变化,他们希望帮助提高他们的技能和连接能力。一项针对澳大利亚脑损伤康复服务的焦点小组研究最近发现,ABI康复专业人员在支持人们在ABI后使用社交媒体方面是限制性的或被动的(而不是主动的);然而,尚不清楚这一发现是否反映了国际惯例。目的调查更多的国际康复专业人员,了解他们对ABI后社交媒体使用的看法和经历,并探讨如何解决康复期间社交媒体的使用问题。研究人员在2020年7月至2022年7月期间通过社交媒体帖子和电子邮件邀请招募参与者,完成一项包含27个问题的在线调查,分为三类:“人口统计信息”(5个问题)、“自己的社交媒体使用”(12个问题)和“ABI之后对社交媒体使用的看法”(10个问题)。使用定向内容分析来探索和解释数据。结果在83名接受调查的康复专业人员中,有68组数据符合分析资格标准。大多数受访者年龄在25至55岁之间(86%),在澳大利亚(53%)、英国(24%)、美国(16%)、加拿大(3%)、欧盟(3%)和亚洲(1%)执业。大多数是语言病理学家(68%)、职业治疗师(9%)或临床神经心理学家(7%)。与ABI患者一起工作的平均经验长度为14.3年(SD = 10.6)。参与者确定了在ABI康复期间使用社交媒体对社会联系和包容的好处,同时也强调了风险和他们自己在知识和专业知识方面的局限性。建议临床指导、政策、资金和资源支持临床医生在康复期间成功实现社会媒体目标。结论:康复专家建议在ABI后的康复过程中常规考虑社交媒体的使用,并报告说他们需要更多的知识、专业知识、资源和政策来支持临床实践。据报道,在康复中实现社会媒体目标是复杂和具有挑战性的,但对所有参与者来说都是有益的。目前迫切需要进行强有力的研究,为康复专业人员提供一个基于证据的框架和资源,以评估和干预这一领域。获得性脑损伤(ABI)患者在受伤后安全、有意义地使用社交媒体时遇到了挑战。由于支持临床实践的指导很少,ABI康复临床医生在解决社会媒体目标的方法上感到不确定,并希望获得更多的知识、专业知识和资源。这篇论文证实了之前的工作,探索了在康复过程中如何处理社交媒体,并通过调查更大的国际ABI康复专业人员群体扩展了我们的知识。康复专家报告说,融入在线社区现在是许多人的社会和职业努力的核心,并建议在ABI后的康复期间常规考虑使用社交媒体。当将社交媒体的使用纳入康复时,临床医生报告了积极的结果,尽管这样做面临着复杂性和挑战。 这项工作的潜在或实际临床意义是什么?本研究的受访者建议康复专业人员在支持ABI后使用社交媒体时考虑潜在的方法和策略。然而,迫切需要进行强有力的研究,为康复专业人员提供基于证据的框架和资源,以评估和干预脑损伤后的社交媒体沟通技巧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (IJLCD) is the official journal of the Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists. The Journal welcomes submissions on all aspects of speech, language, communication disorders and speech and language therapy. It provides a forum for the exchange of information and discussion of issues of clinical or theoretical relevance in the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信