Evaluating and predicting deliverability of natural gas storage sites using stacking machine learning models

0 ENERGY & FUELS
Wei Wei , Jian Hou , Xingqi Liu
{"title":"Evaluating and predicting deliverability of natural gas storage sites using stacking machine learning models","authors":"Wei Wei ,&nbsp;Jian Hou ,&nbsp;Xingqi Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.geoen.2025.213771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Underground natural gas storage (UNGS) is crucial for balancing energy supply and demand, and supporting renewable energy integration. This study evaluates the distribution and deliverability of UNGS sites across the United States from 2014 to 2024, focusing on depleted fields, salt domes, and aquifers. A stacking model that integrates Random Forest, XGBoost, Support Vector Regression, and K-Nearest Neighbors is proposed, with the input parameters including total field capacity, base gas capacity, working gas capacity, surface temperature, site location, and company ownership type. Results show that UNGS sites in the Northeast region have the highest number of storage facilities, whereas the South-Central region exhibits significant capacity and variability. Depleted fields are the most common sites and generally have relatively low median capacities but present the potential for high-capacity storage in specific fields. Interstate pipeline companies and independent operators demonstrate high median deliverability and great variability. The stacking model can achieve superior accuracy across all storage types and outperform individual models. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) sensitivity analysis shows that working gas capacity is the dominant factor influencing deliverability, followed by location, base gas capacity, and total field capacity. These findings offer valuable insights for optimizing UNGS operations and guiding strategic energy decisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100578,"journal":{"name":"Geoenergy Science and Engineering","volume":"249 ","pages":"Article 213771"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoenergy Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949891025001290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Underground natural gas storage (UNGS) is crucial for balancing energy supply and demand, and supporting renewable energy integration. This study evaluates the distribution and deliverability of UNGS sites across the United States from 2014 to 2024, focusing on depleted fields, salt domes, and aquifers. A stacking model that integrates Random Forest, XGBoost, Support Vector Regression, and K-Nearest Neighbors is proposed, with the input parameters including total field capacity, base gas capacity, working gas capacity, surface temperature, site location, and company ownership type. Results show that UNGS sites in the Northeast region have the highest number of storage facilities, whereas the South-Central region exhibits significant capacity and variability. Depleted fields are the most common sites and generally have relatively low median capacities but present the potential for high-capacity storage in specific fields. Interstate pipeline companies and independent operators demonstrate high median deliverability and great variability. The stacking model can achieve superior accuracy across all storage types and outperform individual models. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) sensitivity analysis shows that working gas capacity is the dominant factor influencing deliverability, followed by location, base gas capacity, and total field capacity. These findings offer valuable insights for optimizing UNGS operations and guiding strategic energy decisions.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信