Aphasia partnership training: What outcomes do people with aphasia, family members and speech and language therapists expect?

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Rebecca Palmer, Katerina Hilari, Carla Magdalani, Joanne Coster, Suzanne Beeke, Emma Gibbs, Helen Witts, Kate Sudworth, Caroline Jagoe, Madeline Cruice
{"title":"Aphasia partnership training: What outcomes do people with aphasia, family members and speech and language therapists expect?","authors":"Rebecca Palmer,&nbsp;Katerina Hilari,&nbsp;Carla Magdalani,&nbsp;Joanne Coster,&nbsp;Suzanne Beeke,&nbsp;Emma Gibbs,&nbsp;Helen Witts,&nbsp;Kate Sudworth,&nbsp;Caroline Jagoe,&nbsp;Madeline Cruice","doi":"10.1111/1460-6984.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Life with aphasia affects the whole family with shorter, less frequent conversations, frustration, reduced social networks, isolation and tension in relationships. Evidence suggests communication partner training (CPT) benefits families. However, expected improvements are poorly articulated. The Aphasia Partnership Training (APT) project aimed to identify target outcomes of a new family dyad CPT programme through persons with aphasia (PWA), family member and speech and language therapist (SLT) consensus.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Consensus on desired outcomes was achieved through nominal groups with 20 people with mild to severe aphasia across five groups and 10 family members of people with mild to severe aphasia across three groups, each facilitated by —two to three SLTs. Twelve CPT researchers 16 clinical SLTs with experience of CPT participated in a three-round eDelphi to gain consensus on outcomes they perceived most likely to change. Results were triangulated using a convergence coding scheme to demonstrate agreement, partial agreement, dissonance or silence amongst the three stakeholder groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>All stakeholders agreed ‘conversation’ and ‘thoughts and feelings’ were very important outcomes of APT/very likely to change (agreement). Change in ‘relationships’ was very important to family members, important to PWA and considered very likely to change by SLTs (partial agreement). Change in ‘language’ (specifically talking) was very important to PWA, but not important to family members, and SLTs were uncertain about language improvement from APT (dissonance). Each outcome construct is illustrated by specific examples generated and agreed by all stakeholder groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We should aim to achieve improvements in conversation and thoughts and feelings with CPT, consider the impact on relationships and investigate the potential for language improvement (talking) as an outcome of APT. Outcome measures can be selected based on good coverage of examples generated within these constructs, ensuring they are meaningful to PWA and family members.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS</h3>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> What is already known on the subject</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>We know that people with aphasia (PWA) and their family members often find it difficult to communicate together with wide-reaching consequences. We know that communication partner training (CPT) benefits families as demonstrated in two systematic reviews of 56 small studies. We also know what outcomes PWA and their families want from speech and language therapy in general, but there is little clarity in the literature about what outcomes are expected from CPT specifically.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> What this paper adds to existing knowledge</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>This paper highlights the outcomes PWA, family members and speech and language therapists expect from a new CPT programme called Aphasia Partnership Training. These outcomes can be considered for all family dyad CPT programmes.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>The outcomes identified through the stakeholder consensus presented from this study can be used to set goals and monitor the success of CPT, help PWA and family members decide whether they want to participate in a communication partner intervention, and ensure that measures used to evaluate the success of CPT interventions are meaningful to PWA and their families.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49182,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","volume":"60 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1460-6984.70015","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1460-6984.70015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Life with aphasia affects the whole family with shorter, less frequent conversations, frustration, reduced social networks, isolation and tension in relationships. Evidence suggests communication partner training (CPT) benefits families. However, expected improvements are poorly articulated. The Aphasia Partnership Training (APT) project aimed to identify target outcomes of a new family dyad CPT programme through persons with aphasia (PWA), family member and speech and language therapist (SLT) consensus.

Method

Consensus on desired outcomes was achieved through nominal groups with 20 people with mild to severe aphasia across five groups and 10 family members of people with mild to severe aphasia across three groups, each facilitated by —two to three SLTs. Twelve CPT researchers 16 clinical SLTs with experience of CPT participated in a three-round eDelphi to gain consensus on outcomes they perceived most likely to change. Results were triangulated using a convergence coding scheme to demonstrate agreement, partial agreement, dissonance or silence amongst the three stakeholder groups.

Results

All stakeholders agreed ‘conversation’ and ‘thoughts and feelings’ were very important outcomes of APT/very likely to change (agreement). Change in ‘relationships’ was very important to family members, important to PWA and considered very likely to change by SLTs (partial agreement). Change in ‘language’ (specifically talking) was very important to PWA, but not important to family members, and SLTs were uncertain about language improvement from APT (dissonance). Each outcome construct is illustrated by specific examples generated and agreed by all stakeholder groups.

Conclusions

We should aim to achieve improvements in conversation and thoughts and feelings with CPT, consider the impact on relationships and investigate the potential for language improvement (talking) as an outcome of APT. Outcome measures can be selected based on good coverage of examples generated within these constructs, ensuring they are meaningful to PWA and family members.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

What is already known on the subject

  • We know that people with aphasia (PWA) and their family members often find it difficult to communicate together with wide-reaching consequences. We know that communication partner training (CPT) benefits families as demonstrated in two systematic reviews of 56 small studies. We also know what outcomes PWA and their families want from speech and language therapy in general, but there is little clarity in the literature about what outcomes are expected from CPT specifically.

What this paper adds to existing knowledge

  • This paper highlights the outcomes PWA, family members and speech and language therapists expect from a new CPT programme called Aphasia Partnership Training. These outcomes can be considered for all family dyad CPT programmes.

What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?

  • The outcomes identified through the stakeholder consensus presented from this study can be used to set goals and monitor the success of CPT, help PWA and family members decide whether they want to participate in a communication partner intervention, and ensure that measures used to evaluate the success of CPT interventions are meaningful to PWA and their families.

Abstract Image

失语症合作培训:失语症患者、家庭成员以及言语和语言治疗师期望获得何种结果?
失语症患者的生活影响到整个家庭,他们的谈话时间变短,交谈次数减少,感到沮丧,社交网络减少,人际关系变得孤立和紧张。有证据表明,沟通伙伴培训(CPT)对家庭有益。然而,预期的改进没有得到很好的阐述。失语症伙伴培训(APT)项目旨在通过失语症患者(PWA)、家庭成员和言语和语言治疗师(SLT)的共识,确定新的家庭双元CPT项目的目标结果。方法通过5组20名轻度至重度失语症患者和3组10名轻度至重度失语症患者的家庭成员的名义组来达成预期结果的共识,每个组由- 2至3个slt促进。12名CPT研究人员,16名具有CPT经验的临床slt参加了三轮eDelphi,以获得他们认为最有可能改变的结果的共识。使用收敛编码方案对结果进行三角测量,以证明三个利益相关者群体之间的协议,部分协议,不和谐或沉默。所有利益相关者都同意“对话”和“想法和感受”是APT非常重要的结果/非常可能改变(同意)。“关系”的改变对家庭成员非常重要,对PWA也很重要,而且被认为很可能被slt改变(部分同意)。“语言”(特别是说话)的改变对PWA非常重要,但对家庭成员不重要,并且slt对APT(失调)的语言改善不确定。每个结果结构都由所有利益相关者团体生成并同意的具体示例来说明。我们的目标应该是通过CPT实现对话和思想感受的改善,考虑对人际关系的影响,并调查作为APT结果的语言改善(谈话)的潜力。结果测量可以基于这些构式中生成的示例的良好覆盖来选择,确保它们对PWA和家庭成员有意义。我们知道,失语症患者(PWA)和他们的家庭成员经常发现很难沟通,这带来了广泛的后果。我们知道,沟通伙伴培训(CPT)对家庭有益,这在56项小型研究的两项系统综述中得到了证明。我们也知道PWA和他们的家人一般希望从言语和语言治疗中得到什么结果,但文献中很少明确CPT的具体预期结果。这篇论文强调了PWA,家庭成员和语言治疗师期望从一个名为失语伙伴培训的新CPT项目中获得的结果。这些结果可用于所有的家庭双元CPT项目。这项工作的潜在或实际临床意义是什么?通过本研究提出的利益相关者共识确定的结果可用于设定目标和监测CPT的成功,帮助PWA和家庭成员决定是否要参与沟通伙伴干预,并确保用于评估CPT干预成功的措施对PWA及其家庭有意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (IJLCD) is the official journal of the Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists. The Journal welcomes submissions on all aspects of speech, language, communication disorders and speech and language therapy. It provides a forum for the exchange of information and discussion of issues of clinical or theoretical relevance in the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信