Pytester: Deep reinforcement learning for text-to-testcase generation

IF 3.7 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Wannita Takerngsaksiri , Rujikorn Charakorn , Chakkrit Tantithamthavorn , Yuan-Fang Li
{"title":"Pytester: Deep reinforcement learning for text-to-testcase generation","authors":"Wannita Takerngsaksiri ,&nbsp;Rujikorn Charakorn ,&nbsp;Chakkrit Tantithamthavorn ,&nbsp;Yuan-Fang Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.112381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Test-driven development (TDD) is a widely-employed software development practice that mandates writing test cases based on a textual description <em>before</em> writing the actual code. While writing test cases is the centerpiece of TDD, it is time-consuming, expensive, and often shunned by developers. To address these issues associated with TDD, automated test case generation approaches have recently been investigated. Such approaches take source code as input, but not the textual description. Therefore, existing work does not fully support true TDD, as actual code is required to generate test cases. In addition, current deep learning-based test case generation approaches are trained with one learning objective, i.e., to generate test cases that are exactly matched with the ground-truth test cases. However, such approaches may limit the model’s ability to generate different yet correct test cases. In this paper, we introduce <span>PyTester</span>, a Text-to-Testcase generation approach that can automatically generate syntactically correct, executable, complete, and effective test cases while being aligned with a given textual description. We evaluate <span>PyTester</span> on the public APPS benchmark dataset, and the results show that our Deep RL approach enables <span>PyTester</span>, a small language model, to outperform much larger language models like GPT3.5, StarCoder, and InCoder. Our findings suggest that future research could consider improving small over large LMs for better resource efficiency by integrating the SE domain knowledge into the design of reinforcement learning architecture.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Systems and Software","volume":"224 ","pages":"Article 112381"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Systems and Software","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121225000494","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Test-driven development (TDD) is a widely-employed software development practice that mandates writing test cases based on a textual description before writing the actual code. While writing test cases is the centerpiece of TDD, it is time-consuming, expensive, and often shunned by developers. To address these issues associated with TDD, automated test case generation approaches have recently been investigated. Such approaches take source code as input, but not the textual description. Therefore, existing work does not fully support true TDD, as actual code is required to generate test cases. In addition, current deep learning-based test case generation approaches are trained with one learning objective, i.e., to generate test cases that are exactly matched with the ground-truth test cases. However, such approaches may limit the model’s ability to generate different yet correct test cases. In this paper, we introduce PyTester, a Text-to-Testcase generation approach that can automatically generate syntactically correct, executable, complete, and effective test cases while being aligned with a given textual description. We evaluate PyTester on the public APPS benchmark dataset, and the results show that our Deep RL approach enables PyTester, a small language model, to outperform much larger language models like GPT3.5, StarCoder, and InCoder. Our findings suggest that future research could consider improving small over large LMs for better resource efficiency by integrating the SE domain knowledge into the design of reinforcement learning architecture.
Pytester:用于文本到测试用例生成的深度强化学习
测试驱动开发(TDD)是一种广泛使用的软件开发实践,它要求在编写实际代码之前根据文本描述编写测试用例。虽然编写测试用例是TDD的核心,但它既耗时又昂贵,而且经常被开发人员所回避。为了解决这些与TDD相关的问题,最近研究了自动化测试用例生成方法。这些方法采用源代码作为输入,而不是文本描述。因此,现有的工作并不完全支持真正的TDD,因为需要实际的代码来生成测试用例。此外,当前基于深度学习的测试用例生成方法是用一个学习目标进行训练的,即生成与真实测试用例完全匹配的测试用例。然而,这样的方法可能会限制模型生成不同但正确的测试用例的能力。在本文中,我们将介绍PyTester,这是一种文本到测试用例的生成方法,它可以自动生成语法正确、可执行、完整和有效的测试用例,同时与给定的文本描述保持一致。我们在公共APPS基准数据集上对PyTester进行了评估,结果表明,我们的深度强化学习方法使PyTester(一个小型语言模型)的性能优于GPT3.5、StarCoder和InCoder等大型语言模型。我们的研究结果表明,未来的研究可以考虑通过将SE领域的知识集成到强化学习架构的设计中来改进小型而非大型LMs,以获得更好的资源效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Systems and Software
Journal of Systems and Software 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
193
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Systems and Software publishes papers covering all aspects of software engineering and related hardware-software-systems issues. All articles should include a validation of the idea presented, e.g. through case studies, experiments, or systematic comparisons with other approaches already in practice. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: •Methods and tools for, and empirical studies on, software requirements, design, architecture, verification and validation, maintenance and evolution •Agile, model-driven, service-oriented, open source and global software development •Approaches for mobile, multiprocessing, real-time, distributed, cloud-based, dependable and virtualized systems •Human factors and management concerns of software development •Data management and big data issues of software systems •Metrics and evaluation, data mining of software development resources •Business and economic aspects of software development processes The journal welcomes state-of-the-art surveys and reports of practical experience for all of these topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信