Ecological benefits of tourism management and the challenges of habitat classification

IF 3.5 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Andrew Torsney , Yvonne M. Buckley
{"title":"Ecological benefits of tourism management and the challenges of habitat classification","authors":"Andrew Torsney ,&nbsp;Yvonne M. Buckley","doi":"10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nature-based tourism is increasingly popular, with destination competitiveness tied to natural assets or protection status. While tourism often poses conservation challenges, limited research explores its potential ecological benefits when management aligns ecological and visitor experience goals. We examine how management practices intended to enhance tourism offerings affect plant diversity in a Natura 2000 Special Area of Conservation. We also investigate how habitat classification influences conservation outcomes in two distinct habitat types: the more sensitive Machair Grassland and the less sensitive Fixed Dunes. Habitat classification criteria may affect biodiversity protection, site vulnerability, and the impact of tourism. Using a grazing exclosure experiment, we assess how grazing management influences plant diversity, measured by Simpson’s index. We compare the effects of grazing on biodiversity under the current Fixed Dune classification and an alternative classification as Machair, highlighting the impact of classification on conservation management outcomes. We demonstrate that appropriate grazing management significantly enhances plant diversity, providing evidence for the ecological benefits of managing for both tourism and conservation goals. Furthermore, the study demonstrates that habitat classification criteria can directly affect conservation management outcomes for protected habitats. This study challenges the prevailing 'war-on-tourism' narrative, supporting a synergistic management approach where tourism and conservation are jointly aligned, essential as nature-based tourism continues to grow. Emphasising the imperative of understanding habitat classification and ecological benefits for effective alignment of tourism and conservation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54264,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Conservation","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article e03477"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989425000782","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nature-based tourism is increasingly popular, with destination competitiveness tied to natural assets or protection status. While tourism often poses conservation challenges, limited research explores its potential ecological benefits when management aligns ecological and visitor experience goals. We examine how management practices intended to enhance tourism offerings affect plant diversity in a Natura 2000 Special Area of Conservation. We also investigate how habitat classification influences conservation outcomes in two distinct habitat types: the more sensitive Machair Grassland and the less sensitive Fixed Dunes. Habitat classification criteria may affect biodiversity protection, site vulnerability, and the impact of tourism. Using a grazing exclosure experiment, we assess how grazing management influences plant diversity, measured by Simpson’s index. We compare the effects of grazing on biodiversity under the current Fixed Dune classification and an alternative classification as Machair, highlighting the impact of classification on conservation management outcomes. We demonstrate that appropriate grazing management significantly enhances plant diversity, providing evidence for the ecological benefits of managing for both tourism and conservation goals. Furthermore, the study demonstrates that habitat classification criteria can directly affect conservation management outcomes for protected habitats. This study challenges the prevailing 'war-on-tourism' narrative, supporting a synergistic management approach where tourism and conservation are jointly aligned, essential as nature-based tourism continues to grow. Emphasising the imperative of understanding habitat classification and ecological benefits for effective alignment of tourism and conservation.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Conservation
Global Ecology and Conservation Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
346
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Conservation is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal covering all sub-disciplines of ecological and conservation science: from theory to practice, from molecules to ecosystems, from regional to global. The fields covered include: organismal, population, community, and ecosystem ecology; physiological, evolutionary, and behavioral ecology; and conservation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信