Effect of everolimus administration on renal function in renal transplant recipients: A systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Takehiro Ohyama , Shodai Yoshihiro , Tomoyuki Fujikura , Takamasa Miyauchi , Yuki Kataoka
{"title":"Effect of everolimus administration on renal function in renal transplant recipients: A systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis","authors":"Takehiro Ohyama ,&nbsp;Shodai Yoshihiro ,&nbsp;Tomoyuki Fujikura ,&nbsp;Takamasa Miyauchi ,&nbsp;Yuki Kataoka","doi":"10.1016/j.trre.2025.100911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Everolimus (EVL) is an effective post-transplant immunosuppressant; however, its optimal trough concentration when switching from calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) remains unknown. The optimal dosing troughs for CNI-to-EVL switching in kidney transplant recipients were investigated. We searched multiple electronic databases (from inception to March 15, 2024) to identify double-blind or open-label randomized controlled trials evaluating groups (all ages, both sexes) that converted from CNIs to EVL and continued CNI treatment in kidney transplant recipients. Treatment responses, defined as changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), mortality, dropouts for any reason, and adverse events, were the outcomes. We performed a random-effects, one-stage dose–effect meta-analysis with restricted cubic splines. Nine studies were included, comprising 1872 participants. Changes in eGFR increased with increasing trough concentrations; however, the evidence was highly uncertain (95 % effective dose: 4.13 ng/mL, odds ratio [OR]: 1.31, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.10–9.50). Mortality was not estimated owing to the low number of events. The evidence for the relationship between EVL trough levels and treatment discontinuation was also highly uncertain (OR: 1.31, 95 % CI: 0.10–9.39). Adverse events increased with a switch to EVL; however, this evidence was also uncertain (OR: 1.31, 95 % CI: 0.10–9.60). This study could not indicate an appropriate optimal EVL trough concentration owing to the high result uncertainty, and the results do not support the routine switch from CNIs to EVL. Further trials are required to explore the CNI-to-EVL switch timing and the effects of increased EVL dosing to establish a more definitive therapeutic strategy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48973,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Reviews","volume":"39 2","pages":"Article 100911"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955470X25000114","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Everolimus (EVL) is an effective post-transplant immunosuppressant; however, its optimal trough concentration when switching from calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) remains unknown. The optimal dosing troughs for CNI-to-EVL switching in kidney transplant recipients were investigated. We searched multiple electronic databases (from inception to March 15, 2024) to identify double-blind or open-label randomized controlled trials evaluating groups (all ages, both sexes) that converted from CNIs to EVL and continued CNI treatment in kidney transplant recipients. Treatment responses, defined as changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), mortality, dropouts for any reason, and adverse events, were the outcomes. We performed a random-effects, one-stage dose–effect meta-analysis with restricted cubic splines. Nine studies were included, comprising 1872 participants. Changes in eGFR increased with increasing trough concentrations; however, the evidence was highly uncertain (95 % effective dose: 4.13 ng/mL, odds ratio [OR]: 1.31, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.10–9.50). Mortality was not estimated owing to the low number of events. The evidence for the relationship between EVL trough levels and treatment discontinuation was also highly uncertain (OR: 1.31, 95 % CI: 0.10–9.39). Adverse events increased with a switch to EVL; however, this evidence was also uncertain (OR: 1.31, 95 % CI: 0.10–9.60). This study could not indicate an appropriate optimal EVL trough concentration owing to the high result uncertainty, and the results do not support the routine switch from CNIs to EVL. Further trials are required to explore the CNI-to-EVL switch timing and the effects of increased EVL dosing to establish a more definitive therapeutic strategy.
依维莫司给药对肾移植受者肾功能的影响:一项系统评价和剂量反应荟萃分析
依维莫司是一种有效的移植后免疫抑制剂;然而,当从钙调磷酸酶抑制剂(CNIs)切换时,其最佳谷浓度仍然未知。研究了肾移植受者cni - evl转换的最佳给药槽。我们检索了多个电子数据库(从成立到2024年3月15日),以确定双盲或开放标签随机对照试验,评估肾移植受者从CNI转化为EVL并继续CNI治疗的组(所有年龄,两性)。治疗反应,定义为估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)的变化、死亡率、任何原因的退出和不良事件。我们使用受限三次样条进行了随机效应、一期剂量效应荟萃分析。纳入了9项研究,包括1872名参与者。eGFR的变化随着谷浓度的增加而增加;然而,证据高度不确定(95%有效剂量:4.13 ng/mL,优势比[OR]: 1.31, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.10-9.50)。由于事件数量少,没有估计死亡率。EVL谷底水平与停药之间关系的证据也高度不确定(OR: 1.31, 95% CI: 0.10-9.39)。不良事件随着EVL的转换而增加;然而,这一证据也不确定(OR: 1.31, 95% CI: 0.10-9.60)。由于结果的高不确定性,本研究不能给出一个合适的最佳EVL谷浓度,并且结果不支持从cni到EVL的常规切换。需要进一步的试验来探索cni到EVL的转换时间和EVL剂量增加的影响,以建立更明确的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplantation Reviews
Transplantation Reviews IMMUNOLOGY-TRANSPLANTATION
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
40
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: Transplantation Reviews contains state-of-the-art review articles on both clinical and experimental transplantation. The journal features invited articles by authorities in immunology, transplantation medicine and surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信