Geriatric patients undergo surgery less and have worse survival outcomes with intramedullary ependymoma: A surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database analysis

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Taylor Furst, Muhammad I. Jalal, Prasanth Romiyo, Suyash Sau, Jonathan Stone, Tyler Schmidt
{"title":"Geriatric patients undergo surgery less and have worse survival outcomes with intramedullary ependymoma: A surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database analysis","authors":"Taylor Furst,&nbsp;Muhammad I. Jalal,&nbsp;Prasanth Romiyo,&nbsp;Suyash Sau,&nbsp;Jonathan Stone,&nbsp;Tyler Schmidt","doi":"10.1016/j.clineuro.2025.108807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Intramedullary ependymomas account for ∼50 % of all primary tumors in the spinal cord. Though gross total resection has become mainstay, other predictors of survival remain poorly characterized. The present study aims to perform a survival analysis and compare prognostic factors across pediatric, adult and geriatric cohorts.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was employed to isolate cases of intramedullary ependymomas from 2000 to 2021. Cases were grouped based on age: 0–19 years=pediatric, 20–64 years=adult, 65 + years=geriatric. Kaplan Meier followed by multivariate cox regression analyses were used to identify survival trends. Univariate comparison analyses compared age cohorts.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>2045 cases were included. Geriatric patients demonstrate increased risk of mortality (pediatric vs geriatric: HR=0.23, CI [0.13–0.39], p &lt; 0.001; adult vs geriatric: HR=0.18, CI [0.15–0.23], p &lt; 0.001). Compared to adult patients (92.7 %), geriatric patients (85.2 %) underwent significantly less surgery (p &lt; 0.001). Sex did not influence pediatric or geriatric survival nor did surgery statistically impact pediatric survival, but otherwise surgery not performed, male patients and grade III tumors significantly worsened overall and age-specific survival. Surgery performed in a pediatric patient led to a longer mean survival of 19.8 months, which is clinically relevant despite not meeting statistical significance. Year of diagnosis did not impact overall (p = 0.79) nor age-specific survival (pediatric: p = 0.98, adult: p = 0.91, geriatric: p = 0.11).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Geriatric patients suffer from worse survival than those of younger age. Surgery decreases mortality, yet less geriatric patients are receiving surgical resection. No significant survival gains have been made over the last two decades among any age. Further study is needed to optimize medical management to compliment surgical resection and surgery should be considered more often in geriatric patients to improve survival.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10385,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","volume":"250 ","pages":"Article 108807"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846725000903","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Intramedullary ependymomas account for ∼50 % of all primary tumors in the spinal cord. Though gross total resection has become mainstay, other predictors of survival remain poorly characterized. The present study aims to perform a survival analysis and compare prognostic factors across pediatric, adult and geriatric cohorts.

Methods

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was employed to isolate cases of intramedullary ependymomas from 2000 to 2021. Cases were grouped based on age: 0–19 years=pediatric, 20–64 years=adult, 65 + years=geriatric. Kaplan Meier followed by multivariate cox regression analyses were used to identify survival trends. Univariate comparison analyses compared age cohorts.

Results

2045 cases were included. Geriatric patients demonstrate increased risk of mortality (pediatric vs geriatric: HR=0.23, CI [0.13–0.39], p < 0.001; adult vs geriatric: HR=0.18, CI [0.15–0.23], p < 0.001). Compared to adult patients (92.7 %), geriatric patients (85.2 %) underwent significantly less surgery (p < 0.001). Sex did not influence pediatric or geriatric survival nor did surgery statistically impact pediatric survival, but otherwise surgery not performed, male patients and grade III tumors significantly worsened overall and age-specific survival. Surgery performed in a pediatric patient led to a longer mean survival of 19.8 months, which is clinically relevant despite not meeting statistical significance. Year of diagnosis did not impact overall (p = 0.79) nor age-specific survival (pediatric: p = 0.98, adult: p = 0.91, geriatric: p = 0.11).

Conclusions

Geriatric patients suffer from worse survival than those of younger age. Surgery decreases mortality, yet less geriatric patients are receiving surgical resection. No significant survival gains have been made over the last two decades among any age. Further study is needed to optimize medical management to compliment surgical resection and surgery should be considered more often in geriatric patients to improve survival.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
358
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery is devoted to publishing papers and reports on the clinical aspects of neurology and neurosurgery. It is an international forum for papers of high scientific standard that are of interest to Neurologists and Neurosurgeons world-wide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信