Diagnostic Accuracy of Indocyanine Green–stained Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Prostate Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Yi-Ju Chou , Chia-Lun Chang , Yao-Chou Tsai
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of Indocyanine Green–stained Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Prostate Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Yi-Ju Chou ,&nbsp;Chia-Lun Chang ,&nbsp;Yao-Chou Tsai","doi":"10.1016/j.euros.2025.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Indocyanine green-guided sentinel lymph node dissection (ICG-SLND) has demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy for lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer. This study aims to perform a meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of ICG-SLND at both the per-patient and the per-node level.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a literature search on PubMed and Embase for relevant studies published up to June 2024. The inclusion criteria were prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy, ICG-SLND, and subsequent extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND). Data were extracted to calculate the pooled sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) at both the per-patient and the per-node level.</div></div><div><h3>Key findings and limitations</h3><div>Our search identified 13 relevant studies, comprising a total of 748 patients. All studies were assessed as having a low risk of bias. At the per-patient level, the pooled sensitivity of ICG-SLND for diagnosing lymph node metastasis was 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77–0.92), with a pooled NPV of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.90–0.98). At the per-node level, the pooled sensitivity was 0.53 (95% CI: 0.45–0.62), and the pooled NPV was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97–0.98). Significant heterogeneity was observed in the per-node level sensitivity, NPV, and sentinel lymph node detection rate outcomes. The primary limitation is the lack of investigation into the impact of ICG-SLND on survival outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3><div>The per-patient level sensitivity of ICG-SLND for diagnosing lymph node metastases is 87%, which better represents the diagnostic accuracy of ICG-SLND than the per-node level sensitivity. As ePLND has demonstrated a positive impact on oncologic outcomes, ICG-SLND cannot yet be recommended as the standard lymph node dissection approach. The significant heterogeneity observed in the pooled results highlights the need for further research to determine the optimal injection methods.</div></div><div><h3>Patient summary</h3><div>Indocyanine green–guided sentinel lymph node dissection (ICG-SLND) has demonstrated favorable performance for diagnosing lymph node metastases in prostate cancer. The per-patient level sensitivity of ICG-SLND provides better diagnostic performance than its per-node level sensitivity. However, further research is needed for ICG-SLND to be recommended as the standard approach for lymph node dissection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12254,"journal":{"name":"European Urology Open Science","volume":"74 ","pages":"Pages 34-43"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Urology Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168325000618","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective

Indocyanine green-guided sentinel lymph node dissection (ICG-SLND) has demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy for lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer. This study aims to perform a meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of ICG-SLND at both the per-patient and the per-node level.

Methods

We conducted a literature search on PubMed and Embase for relevant studies published up to June 2024. The inclusion criteria were prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy, ICG-SLND, and subsequent extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND). Data were extracted to calculate the pooled sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) at both the per-patient and the per-node level.

Key findings and limitations

Our search identified 13 relevant studies, comprising a total of 748 patients. All studies were assessed as having a low risk of bias. At the per-patient level, the pooled sensitivity of ICG-SLND for diagnosing lymph node metastasis was 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77–0.92), with a pooled NPV of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.90–0.98). At the per-node level, the pooled sensitivity was 0.53 (95% CI: 0.45–0.62), and the pooled NPV was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97–0.98). Significant heterogeneity was observed in the per-node level sensitivity, NPV, and sentinel lymph node detection rate outcomes. The primary limitation is the lack of investigation into the impact of ICG-SLND on survival outcomes.

Conclusions and clinical implications

The per-patient level sensitivity of ICG-SLND for diagnosing lymph node metastases is 87%, which better represents the diagnostic accuracy of ICG-SLND than the per-node level sensitivity. As ePLND has demonstrated a positive impact on oncologic outcomes, ICG-SLND cannot yet be recommended as the standard lymph node dissection approach. The significant heterogeneity observed in the pooled results highlights the need for further research to determine the optimal injection methods.

Patient summary

Indocyanine green–guided sentinel lymph node dissection (ICG-SLND) has demonstrated favorable performance for diagnosing lymph node metastases in prostate cancer. The per-patient level sensitivity of ICG-SLND provides better diagnostic performance than its per-node level sensitivity. However, further research is needed for ICG-SLND to be recommended as the standard approach for lymph node dissection.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Urology Open Science
European Urology Open Science UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
1183
审稿时长
49 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信