Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in women with GCK-MODY: an observational study based on standardised insulin modalities

IF 8.4 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Cécile Ciangura, Aurélien Seco, Cécile Saint-Martin, Pierre-Yves Ancel, Delphine Bouvet, Sophie Jacqueminet, Agnès Hartemann, Jacques Lepercq, Jacky Nizard, José Timsit, Christine Bellanné-Chantelot
{"title":"Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in women with GCK-MODY: an observational study based on standardised insulin modalities","authors":"Cécile Ciangura, Aurélien Seco, Cécile Saint-Martin, Pierre-Yves Ancel, Delphine Bouvet, Sophie Jacqueminet, Agnès Hartemann, Jacques Lepercq, Jacky Nizard, José Timsit, Christine Bellanné-Chantelot","doi":"10.1007/s00125-025-06363-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Aims/hypothesis</h3><p>The management of <i>GCK</i>-MODY during pregnancy remains challenging. We evaluated the impact on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of two standardised insulin strategies.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>In this prospective observational study, participants chose (in agreement with their physician) to be treated with insulin either when maternal capillary blood glucose (CBG) ≥ thresholds for gestational diabetes (5.3 mmol/l before or 6.7 mmol/l 2 h after meals) (MG group) or when fetal abdominal circumference ≥75th percentile (FG group). In the FG group, insulin was also initiated if CBG ≥ safety levels (6.7 mmol/l before meals or 11.1 mmol/l 2 h after meals). Data on glycaemic management, modalities and timing of insulin therapy and maternal and neonatal outcomes were recorded.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>In the MG group (<i>n</i>=25), insulin was initiated more frequently (100% vs 75%, <i>p</i>=0.01) and earlier (<i>p</i>=0.001), with lower CBG and more frequent hypoglycaemic episodes compared with the FG group (<i>n</i>=21). However, there were no differences in pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. In the total cohort, the rate of large for gestational age (LGA) neonates, preterm deliveries and Caesarean sections was 22.2%, 2.2% and 40%, respectively. The rate of LGA was 0% among the neonates with the <i>GCK</i> variant vs 36% in those without (<i>p</i>=0.005). There were no associations between LGA and pregnancy characteristics, insulin therapy strategy or glycaemic management.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions/interpretation</h3><p>In our study, the rate of LGA primarily depended on the fetal <i>GCK</i> genotype rather than the treatment strategy or glycaemic management. Our results suggest that a standardised strategy based on ultrasound monitoring of fetal growth and glycaemic safety thresholds, leading to delayed insulin initiation, offers a good fetal prognosis and minimises the risk of maternal hypoglycaemia.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Trial registration</h3><p>ClinTrials.gov NCT02556840.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical Abstract</h3>\n","PeriodicalId":11164,"journal":{"name":"Diabetologia","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-025-06363-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis

The management of GCK-MODY during pregnancy remains challenging. We evaluated the impact on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of two standardised insulin strategies.

Methods

In this prospective observational study, participants chose (in agreement with their physician) to be treated with insulin either when maternal capillary blood glucose (CBG) ≥ thresholds for gestational diabetes (5.3 mmol/l before or 6.7 mmol/l 2 h after meals) (MG group) or when fetal abdominal circumference ≥75th percentile (FG group). In the FG group, insulin was also initiated if CBG ≥ safety levels (6.7 mmol/l before meals or 11.1 mmol/l 2 h after meals). Data on glycaemic management, modalities and timing of insulin therapy and maternal and neonatal outcomes were recorded.

Results

In the MG group (n=25), insulin was initiated more frequently (100% vs 75%, p=0.01) and earlier (p=0.001), with lower CBG and more frequent hypoglycaemic episodes compared with the FG group (n=21). However, there were no differences in pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. In the total cohort, the rate of large for gestational age (LGA) neonates, preterm deliveries and Caesarean sections was 22.2%, 2.2% and 40%, respectively. The rate of LGA was 0% among the neonates with the GCK variant vs 36% in those without (p=0.005). There were no associations between LGA and pregnancy characteristics, insulin therapy strategy or glycaemic management.

Conclusions/interpretation

In our study, the rate of LGA primarily depended on the fetal GCK genotype rather than the treatment strategy or glycaemic management. Our results suggest that a standardised strategy based on ultrasound monitoring of fetal growth and glycaemic safety thresholds, leading to delayed insulin initiation, offers a good fetal prognosis and minimises the risk of maternal hypoglycaemia.

Trial registration

ClinTrials.gov NCT02556840.

Graphical Abstract

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetologia
Diabetologia 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
18.10
自引率
2.40%
发文量
193
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Diabetologia, the authoritative journal dedicated to diabetes research, holds high visibility through society membership, libraries, and social media. As the official journal of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes, it is ranked in the top quartile of the 2019 JCR Impact Factors in the Endocrinology & Metabolism category. The journal boasts dedicated and expert editorial teams committed to supporting authors throughout the peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信