Addressing Clinical Challenges in Aberrant Pharmacokinetics of Biologic Therapeutic Drugs: Investigating Sample Processing Procedure in the Immunoassays.

IF 5 3区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Yih-Wen Chen, Olinda Davenport, Nancy Yu, Rachel Melendez, James Nugteren, Ihsan Nijem, Weili Yan, Robert Hendricks, Yuan Song
{"title":"Addressing Clinical Challenges in Aberrant Pharmacokinetics of Biologic Therapeutic Drugs: Investigating Sample Processing Procedure in the Immunoassays.","authors":"Yih-Wen Chen, Olinda Davenport, Nancy Yu, Rachel Melendez, James Nugteren, Ihsan Nijem, Weili Yan, Robert Hendricks, Yuan Song","doi":"10.1208/s12248-025-01036-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bioanalytical Pharmacokinetics (PK) methods are designed for robust performance under rigorous regulatory compliance requirements to ensure the generated data is reliable and maintains integrity. In a phase 1 dose-finding clinical study, aberrant PK profiles of two co-administered biologics drugs were observed. Unexpectedly, we discovered high fill levels in collection tubes from the majority of samples. This led to the hypothesis that the highly filled tubes might cause difficulty in achieving complete sample thaw and thorough mixing at the time of sample analysis, potentially contributing to the abnormalities observed in the PK dataset. Evaluation of the impact of sample fill levels and processing procedure can be challenging since PK concentrations of study samples were unknown. Therefore, a systematic approach was employed to conduct a thorough examination using mock samples. The data illustrate a correlation between sample thawing and mixing process and the variability in the PK data. The concentrations from properly filled mock samples that underwent complete thawing and mixing showed 100% data reproducibility. In contrast, the concentrations from fully filled mock samples that did not follow the proper procedure showed sample recovery deviating by ± 30% from nominal value and exhibited considerable lack of precision. This data identified the root cause of aberrant PK, justifying revised sample preparation guidance and sample re-assay. Improved sample handling and subsequent reassay resolved the aberrant PK profile issues. In conclusion, this study reiterated that sample handling plays a crucial role in quality and reproducibility of PK data with immunoassays.</p>","PeriodicalId":50934,"journal":{"name":"AAPS Journal","volume":"27 2","pages":"46"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAPS Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-025-01036-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bioanalytical Pharmacokinetics (PK) methods are designed for robust performance under rigorous regulatory compliance requirements to ensure the generated data is reliable and maintains integrity. In a phase 1 dose-finding clinical study, aberrant PK profiles of two co-administered biologics drugs were observed. Unexpectedly, we discovered high fill levels in collection tubes from the majority of samples. This led to the hypothesis that the highly filled tubes might cause difficulty in achieving complete sample thaw and thorough mixing at the time of sample analysis, potentially contributing to the abnormalities observed in the PK dataset. Evaluation of the impact of sample fill levels and processing procedure can be challenging since PK concentrations of study samples were unknown. Therefore, a systematic approach was employed to conduct a thorough examination using mock samples. The data illustrate a correlation between sample thawing and mixing process and the variability in the PK data. The concentrations from properly filled mock samples that underwent complete thawing and mixing showed 100% data reproducibility. In contrast, the concentrations from fully filled mock samples that did not follow the proper procedure showed sample recovery deviating by ± 30% from nominal value and exhibited considerable lack of precision. This data identified the root cause of aberrant PK, justifying revised sample preparation guidance and sample re-assay. Improved sample handling and subsequent reassay resolved the aberrant PK profile issues. In conclusion, this study reiterated that sample handling plays a crucial role in quality and reproducibility of PK data with immunoassays.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AAPS Journal
AAPS Journal 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.40%
发文量
109
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The AAPS Journal, an official journal of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS), publishes novel and significant findings in the various areas of pharmaceutical sciences impacting human and veterinary therapeutics, including: · Drug Design and Discovery · Pharmaceutical Biotechnology · Biopharmaceutics, Formulation, and Drug Delivery · Metabolism and Transport · Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacometrics · Translational Research · Clinical Evaluations and Therapeutic Outcomes · Regulatory Science We invite submissions under the following article types: · Original Research Articles · Reviews and Mini-reviews · White Papers, Commentaries, and Editorials · Meeting Reports · Brief/Technical Reports and Rapid Communications · Regulatory Notes · Tutorials · Protocols in the Pharmaceutical Sciences In addition, The AAPS Journal publishes themes, organized by guest editors, which are focused on particular areas of current interest to our field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信