Predictors of Discoid Morphology in Lateral Meniscal Tears: Introducing a Novel Meniscal Height Ratio.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Rida Salman, Jason Zarahi Amaral, Rebecca Schultz, Rioke Diejomaoh, Krishna Chandra, Jie C Nguyen, Indranil Kushare, Scott D McKay, J. Herman Kan
{"title":"Predictors of Discoid Morphology in Lateral Meniscal Tears: Introducing a Novel Meniscal Height Ratio.","authors":"Rida Salman, Jason Zarahi Amaral, Rebecca Schultz, Rioke Diejomaoh, Krishna Chandra, Jie C Nguyen, Indranil Kushare, Scott D McKay, J. Herman Kan","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.01.039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>Identifying underlying discoid morphology in the setting of a lateral meniscal tear (LMT) can be challenging with no clear consensus on its definition. We aim to determine the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics of discoid morphology, including a novel meniscal height ratio.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of patients undergoing arthroscopic repair of isolated LMT between 2018 and 2023. MRIs were reviewed for the presence of discoid morphology, meniscocapsular ligaments and bone contusion, tear patterns, and lateral/medial meniscal height comparison to generate a ratio. Logistic regression was employed to assess predictive factors for discoid. Descriptive statistics were used to determine MRI diagnostic performance and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to identify an optimal threshold for the meniscal height ratio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 283 knees (mean age 14.9 years; 76% male); 112 with discoid morphology (group 1, G1), and 171 non-discoid (group 2, G2). Lateral bone contusions were less common in G1 than G2 (P<0.001). Meniscocapsular ligaments were identified in 68% of G1 versus 88% in G2 (P=0.001). G1 patients had a significantly greater meniscal height ratio compared with G2 (P<0.001). Female sex, younger age and horizontal tears were statistically significantly associated with G1. ROC analysis identified an optimal threshold of 1.21. Similar diagnostic accuracy for binomially determining underlying discoid morphology comparing a height ratio of 1.21 and lateral tibiofemoral meniscal coverage >50%. Selectively combining both parameters gives 100% specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The meniscal height ratio plays a complementary role with other imaging and demographic findings to identify underlying discoid morphology.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2025.01.039","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale and objectives: Identifying underlying discoid morphology in the setting of a lateral meniscal tear (LMT) can be challenging with no clear consensus on its definition. We aim to determine the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics of discoid morphology, including a novel meniscal height ratio.

Methods: A retrospective study of patients undergoing arthroscopic repair of isolated LMT between 2018 and 2023. MRIs were reviewed for the presence of discoid morphology, meniscocapsular ligaments and bone contusion, tear patterns, and lateral/medial meniscal height comparison to generate a ratio. Logistic regression was employed to assess predictive factors for discoid. Descriptive statistics were used to determine MRI diagnostic performance and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to identify an optimal threshold for the meniscal height ratio.

Results: We included 283 knees (mean age 14.9 years; 76% male); 112 with discoid morphology (group 1, G1), and 171 non-discoid (group 2, G2). Lateral bone contusions were less common in G1 than G2 (P<0.001). Meniscocapsular ligaments were identified in 68% of G1 versus 88% in G2 (P=0.001). G1 patients had a significantly greater meniscal height ratio compared with G2 (P<0.001). Female sex, younger age and horizontal tears were statistically significantly associated with G1. ROC analysis identified an optimal threshold of 1.21. Similar diagnostic accuracy for binomially determining underlying discoid morphology comparing a height ratio of 1.21 and lateral tibiofemoral meniscal coverage >50%. Selectively combining both parameters gives 100% specificity.

Conclusion: The meniscal height ratio plays a complementary role with other imaging and demographic findings to identify underlying discoid morphology.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信