Gender Equity Education in Oncology: A Survey Study of Hematology-Oncology Fellowship Program Directors.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Christina E Hum, Ana I Velazquez, Ariela L Marshall
{"title":"Gender Equity Education in Oncology: A Survey Study of Hematology-Oncology Fellowship Program Directors.","authors":"Christina E Hum, Ana I Velazquez, Ariela L Marshall","doi":"10.1007/s13187-025-02591-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Female patients and physicians experience gender-based challenges in medicine. We aimed to evaluate the extent of training on gender disparities in patient care and equity among physicians by hematology-oncology (HO) programs, along with barriers to training implementation. We conducted an online survey of 171 HO fellowship program directors (PDs) registered in the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) or participating in the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS). We asked about perceived importance of gender equity (GE), extent of GE training provided, and barriers to providing it. Responses were recorded using Likert scales, multiple choice, and open-ended responses. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Fifty-six program directors completed the survey (32.7%). Most felt training in GE issues is \"somewhat\" to \"very\" important to patient care (69.6%) and the physician workforce (80.4%). However, most reported their programs do not provide training in GE regarding patient care (83.9%) or the physician workforce (78.6%), most commonly due to lack of resources. Most were interested in resources for patient (93.9%) and physician (88.6%) GE. Programs were open to sharing training materials for patient (44.4%) and physician (66.7%) GE. While most HO PDs feel that GE training is important for patient care and the physician workforce, most fellowships do not offer such training primarily due to lack of resources. Given the interest for more educational GE resources, there are opportunities to develop and share materials to enhance GE training for future HO physicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02591-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Female patients and physicians experience gender-based challenges in medicine. We aimed to evaluate the extent of training on gender disparities in patient care and equity among physicians by hematology-oncology (HO) programs, along with barriers to training implementation. We conducted an online survey of 171 HO fellowship program directors (PDs) registered in the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) or participating in the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS). We asked about perceived importance of gender equity (GE), extent of GE training provided, and barriers to providing it. Responses were recorded using Likert scales, multiple choice, and open-ended responses. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Fifty-six program directors completed the survey (32.7%). Most felt training in GE issues is "somewhat" to "very" important to patient care (69.6%) and the physician workforce (80.4%). However, most reported their programs do not provide training in GE regarding patient care (83.9%) or the physician workforce (78.6%), most commonly due to lack of resources. Most were interested in resources for patient (93.9%) and physician (88.6%) GE. Programs were open to sharing training materials for patient (44.4%) and physician (66.7%) GE. While most HO PDs feel that GE training is important for patient care and the physician workforce, most fellowships do not offer such training primarily due to lack of resources. Given the interest for more educational GE resources, there are opportunities to develop and share materials to enhance GE training for future HO physicians.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Education
Journal of Cancer Education 医学-医学:信息
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
122
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues. Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care. We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts. Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited. Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants. Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信