In-Hospital or Out-of-Hospital Initiation of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Valsartan in Patients With Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction After A Worsening Heart Failure Event: The PARAGLIDE-HF Trial.
Nina Nouhravesh, Derek Cyr, Adrian F Hernandez, David A Morrow, Eric J Velazquez, Jonathan Ward, Samiha Sarwat, Kavita Sharma, Kristin Williamson, Randall C Starling, Serge Lepage, Shelley Zieroth, Scott D Solomon, Robert J Mentz
{"title":"In-Hospital or Out-of-Hospital Initiation of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Valsartan in Patients With Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction After A Worsening Heart Failure Event: The PARAGLIDE-HF Trial.","authors":"Nina Nouhravesh, Derek Cyr, Adrian F Hernandez, David A Morrow, Eric J Velazquez, Jonathan Ward, Samiha Sarwat, Kavita Sharma, Kristin Williamson, Randall C Starling, Serge Lepage, Shelley Zieroth, Scott D Solomon, Robert J Mentz","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.124.037899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Efficacy and tolerability of sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) is not well characterized in heart failure (HF) with ejection fraction >40% initiated in-hospital. Thus, this prespecified PARAGLIDE-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ARB Given Following Stabilization In Decompensated HFpEF) analysis assessed the effects of Sac/Val versus valsartan (Val) by location of initiation in HF with ejection fraction >40% and recent worsening HF.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This analysis of the double-blind, randomized controlled trial assessed patients by in-hospital and out-of-hospital (≤30 days of worsening HF) initiation. The primary end point was time-averaged proportional change in NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) from baseline through weeks 4 and 8. A secondary hierarchical outcome consisted of cardiovascular death, HF hospitalizations, urgent HF visits, and NT-proBNP change. Safety end points were symptomatic hypotension, hyperkalemia, and worsening renal function. Overall, 324 (70%, 162 Sac/Val, 162 Val) were initiated in-hospital and 142 (71 Sac/Val, 71 Val) out-of-hospital. There was no evidence of a statistically significant differential treatment benefit of Sac/Val versus Val on NT-proBNP change by location of initiation (in-hospital, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.70-1.05] and out-of-hospital, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.70-1.09]; <i>P</i><sub>interaction</sub>=0.99). The win ratio for the hierarchical outcome was 1.09 (95% CI, 0.82-1.45; <i>P</i>=0.57) for in-hospital and 1.43 (95% CI, 0.91-2.26; <i>P</i>=0.12) for out-of-hospital. For the safety end points of symptomatic hypotension, hyperkalemia, and worsening renal function, no statistically significant differences in tolerability were seen between in-hospital and out-hospital initiation (<i>P</i><sub>interaction</sub>>0.1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sac/Val provided consistent benefit compared with Val, whether initiated in-hospital or out-of-hospital in HF with ejection fraction >40% with a recent worsening HF event, demonstrating an opportunity to improve postdischarge outcomes by initiating Sac/Val during hospitalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":54370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":" ","pages":"e037899"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.037899","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Efficacy and tolerability of sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) is not well characterized in heart failure (HF) with ejection fraction >40% initiated in-hospital. Thus, this prespecified PARAGLIDE-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ARB Given Following Stabilization In Decompensated HFpEF) analysis assessed the effects of Sac/Val versus valsartan (Val) by location of initiation in HF with ejection fraction >40% and recent worsening HF.
Methods and results: This analysis of the double-blind, randomized controlled trial assessed patients by in-hospital and out-of-hospital (≤30 days of worsening HF) initiation. The primary end point was time-averaged proportional change in NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) from baseline through weeks 4 and 8. A secondary hierarchical outcome consisted of cardiovascular death, HF hospitalizations, urgent HF visits, and NT-proBNP change. Safety end points were symptomatic hypotension, hyperkalemia, and worsening renal function. Overall, 324 (70%, 162 Sac/Val, 162 Val) were initiated in-hospital and 142 (71 Sac/Val, 71 Val) out-of-hospital. There was no evidence of a statistically significant differential treatment benefit of Sac/Val versus Val on NT-proBNP change by location of initiation (in-hospital, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.70-1.05] and out-of-hospital, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.70-1.09]; Pinteraction=0.99). The win ratio for the hierarchical outcome was 1.09 (95% CI, 0.82-1.45; P=0.57) for in-hospital and 1.43 (95% CI, 0.91-2.26; P=0.12) for out-of-hospital. For the safety end points of symptomatic hypotension, hyperkalemia, and worsening renal function, no statistically significant differences in tolerability were seen between in-hospital and out-hospital initiation (Pinteraction>0.1).
Conclusions: Sac/Val provided consistent benefit compared with Val, whether initiated in-hospital or out-of-hospital in HF with ejection fraction >40% with a recent worsening HF event, demonstrating an opportunity to improve postdischarge outcomes by initiating Sac/Val during hospitalization.
期刊介绍:
As an Open Access journal, JAHA - Journal of the American Heart Association is rapidly and freely available, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice.
JAHA is an authoritative, peer-reviewed Open Access journal focusing on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. JAHA provides a global forum for basic and clinical research and timely reviews on cardiovascular disease and stroke. As an Open Access journal, its content is free on publication to read, download, and share, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice.