Toward a New Conceptual Framework for Digital Mental Health Technologies: Scoping Review.

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Jmir Mental Health Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.2196/63484
Gareth Hopkin, Holly Coole, Francesca Edelmann, Lynda Ayiku, Richard Branson, Paul Campbell, Sophie Cooper, Mark Salmon
{"title":"Toward a New Conceptual Framework for Digital Mental Health Technologies: Scoping Review.","authors":"Gareth Hopkin, Holly Coole, Francesca Edelmann, Lynda Ayiku, Richard Branson, Paul Campbell, Sophie Cooper, Mark Salmon","doi":"10.2196/63484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital mental health technologies (DMHTs) are becoming more widely available and are seen as having the potential to improve the quality of mental health care. However, conversations around the potential impact of DMHTs can be impacted by a lack of focus on the types of technologies that are available. Several frameworks that could apply to DMHTs are available, but they have not been developed with comprehensive methods and have limitations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To address limitations with current frameworks, we aimed to identify existing literature on the categorization of DMHTs, to explore challenges with categorizing DMHTs for specific purposes, and to develop a new conceptual framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used an iterative approach to develop the framework. First, we completed a rapid review of the literature to identify studies that provided domains that could be used to categorize DMHTs. Second, findings from this review and associated issues were discussed by an expert working group, including professionals from a wide range of relevant settings. Third, we synthesized findings to develop a new conceptual framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rapid review identified 3603 unique results, and hand searching identified another 3 potentially relevant papers. Of these, 24 papers were eligible for inclusion, which provided 10 domains to categorize DMHTs. The expert working group proposed a broad framework and based on the findings of the review and group discussions, we developed a new conceptual framework with 8 domains that represent important characteristics of DMHTs. These 8 domains are population, setting, platform or system, purpose, type of approach, human interaction, human responsiveness, and functionality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This conceptual framework provides a structure for various stakeholders to define the key characteristics of DMHTs. It has been developed with more comprehensive methods than previous attempts with similar aims. The framework can facilitate communication within the field and could undergo further iteration to ensure it is appropriate for specific purposes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48616,"journal":{"name":"Jmir Mental Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"e63484"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11864090/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jmir Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/63484","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Digital mental health technologies (DMHTs) are becoming more widely available and are seen as having the potential to improve the quality of mental health care. However, conversations around the potential impact of DMHTs can be impacted by a lack of focus on the types of technologies that are available. Several frameworks that could apply to DMHTs are available, but they have not been developed with comprehensive methods and have limitations.

Objective: To address limitations with current frameworks, we aimed to identify existing literature on the categorization of DMHTs, to explore challenges with categorizing DMHTs for specific purposes, and to develop a new conceptual framework.

Methods: We used an iterative approach to develop the framework. First, we completed a rapid review of the literature to identify studies that provided domains that could be used to categorize DMHTs. Second, findings from this review and associated issues were discussed by an expert working group, including professionals from a wide range of relevant settings. Third, we synthesized findings to develop a new conceptual framework.

Results: The rapid review identified 3603 unique results, and hand searching identified another 3 potentially relevant papers. Of these, 24 papers were eligible for inclusion, which provided 10 domains to categorize DMHTs. The expert working group proposed a broad framework and based on the findings of the review and group discussions, we developed a new conceptual framework with 8 domains that represent important characteristics of DMHTs. These 8 domains are population, setting, platform or system, purpose, type of approach, human interaction, human responsiveness, and functionality.

Conclusions: This conceptual framework provides a structure for various stakeholders to define the key characteristics of DMHTs. It has been developed with more comprehensive methods than previous attempts with similar aims. The framework can facilitate communication within the field and could undergo further iteration to ensure it is appropriate for specific purposes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

迈向数字心理健康技术的新概念框架:范围审查。
背景:数字精神卫生技术(DMHTs)正变得越来越广泛,并被视为具有提高精神卫生保健质量的潜力。然而,由于缺乏对现有技术类型的关注,围绕dmht潜在影响的讨论可能会受到影响。目前已有几个适用于dmht的框架,但它们尚未采用全面的方法开发,并且存在局限性。目的:为了解决现有框架的局限性,我们旨在识别关于dmht分类的现有文献,探讨针对特定目的对dmht进行分类的挑战,并开发一个新的概念框架。方法:我们使用迭代方法来开发框架。首先,我们完成了对文献的快速回顾,以确定提供可用于对dmht进行分类的域的研究。其次,本次审查的结果和相关问题由一个专家工作组讨论,其中包括来自广泛相关环境的专业人员。第三,我们综合了研究结果,建立了一个新的概念框架。结果:快速审稿发现了3603个独特的结果,手工检索发现了另外3篇可能相关的论文。其中24篇论文符合纳入条件,提供了10个dmht分类领域。专家工作组提出了一个广泛的框架,并根据审查和小组讨论的结果,我们开发了一个新的概念框架,其中包含代表dmht重要特征的8个领域。这8个领域是人口、环境、平台或系统、目的、方法类型、人类交互、人类响应和功能。结论:这一概念框架为各种利益相关者定义dmht的关键特征提供了一个结构。它的开发方法比以前具有类似目标的尝试更全面。该框架可以促进领域内的通信,并且可以进行进一步的迭代,以确保它适合特定的目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Jmir Mental Health
Jmir Mental Health Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
104
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JMIR Mental Health (JMH, ISSN 2368-7959) is a PubMed-indexed, peer-reviewed sister journal of JMIR, the leading eHealth journal (Impact Factor 2016: 5.175). JMIR Mental Health focusses on digital health and Internet interventions, technologies and electronic innovations (software and hardware) for mental health, addictions, online counselling and behaviour change. This includes formative evaluation and system descriptions, theoretical papers, review papers, viewpoint/vision papers, and rigorous evaluations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信