Shouldice Versus TAPP for Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Lucas Monteiro Delgado, Bernardo Fontel Pompeu, Caio Mendonça Magalhães, Eric Pasqualotto, William Silva Barbosa, Sergio Mazzola Poli de Figueiredo
{"title":"Shouldice Versus TAPP for Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Lucas Monteiro Delgado, Bernardo Fontel Pompeu, Caio Mendonça Magalhães, Eric Pasqualotto, William Silva Barbosa, Sergio Mazzola Poli de Figueiredo","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Inguinal hernia (IH) repair is one of the most common surgical procedures worldwide. Among the various techniques available, the Shouldice (SHD) technique is mainly used for nonmesh open repair whereas, the transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach is a commonly performed minimally invasive method. Despite its widespread use, a direct comparison between the two techniques is lacking. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the short and long-term outcomes of SHD and TAPP for elective IH repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library on April 16. Mean differences (MDs) and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled for continuous and binary endpoints, respectively. Heterogeneity was assessed with I<sup>2</sup> statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen RCTs comprising 2214 patients were included. Of these, 1089 patients (49%) underwent SHD repair and 1125 (51%) patients underwent TAPP repair. The mean BMI was reported in four studies ranging from 23 to 25.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Data regarding hernia sizes were not available. Compared with TAPP, SHD significantly reduced seroma (RR 0.20; 95% CI 0.04-0.90; p = 0.04; and I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) and increased chronic pain (RR 2.13; 95% CI 1.31-3.46; p < 0.01; and I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) and 1-day postoperative pain (MD 2.01; 95% CI 0.72-3.29; p < 0.01; and I<sup>2</sup> = 97%). However, there were no significant differences between the groups in recurrence (RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.66-1.35; p = 0.75; and I<sup>2</sup> = 12%), hematoma (RR 1.08; 95% CI 0.80-1.46; p = 0.63; and I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), urinary retention (RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.49-1.36; p = 0.43; and I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), and testicular atrophy (RR 3.28; 95% CI 0.79-13.54; p = 0.10; and I<sup>2</sup> = 0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SHD repair demonstrated a lower occurrence of seromas; however, it was associated with a higher occurrence of both acute and chronic postoperative pain compared to TAPP in patients with a normal BMI. No significant differences were observed between the two techniques in terms of hernia recurrence, hematoma formation, urinary retention, or testicular atrophy rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12514","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Inguinal hernia (IH) repair is one of the most common surgical procedures worldwide. Among the various techniques available, the Shouldice (SHD) technique is mainly used for nonmesh open repair whereas, the transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach is a commonly performed minimally invasive method. Despite its widespread use, a direct comparison between the two techniques is lacking. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the short and long-term outcomes of SHD and TAPP for elective IH repair.

Methods: We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library on April 16. Mean differences (MDs) and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled for continuous and binary endpoints, respectively. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics.

Results: Thirteen RCTs comprising 2214 patients were included. Of these, 1089 patients (49%) underwent SHD repair and 1125 (51%) patients underwent TAPP repair. The mean BMI was reported in four studies ranging from 23 to 25.7 kg/m2. Data regarding hernia sizes were not available. Compared with TAPP, SHD significantly reduced seroma (RR 0.20; 95% CI 0.04-0.90; p = 0.04; and I2 = 0%) and increased chronic pain (RR 2.13; 95% CI 1.31-3.46; p < 0.01; and I2 = 0%) and 1-day postoperative pain (MD 2.01; 95% CI 0.72-3.29; p < 0.01; and I2 = 97%). However, there were no significant differences between the groups in recurrence (RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.66-1.35; p = 0.75; and I2 = 12%), hematoma (RR 1.08; 95% CI 0.80-1.46; p = 0.63; and I2 = 0%), urinary retention (RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.49-1.36; p = 0.43; and I2 = 0%), and testicular atrophy (RR 3.28; 95% CI 0.79-13.54; p = 0.10; and I2 = 0%).

Conclusion: SHD repair demonstrated a lower occurrence of seromas; however, it was associated with a higher occurrence of both acute and chronic postoperative pain compared to TAPP in patients with a normal BMI. No significant differences were observed between the two techniques in terms of hernia recurrence, hematoma formation, urinary retention, or testicular atrophy rates.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Surgery
World Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
460
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the International Society of Surgery/Societe Internationale de Chirurgie (iss-sic.com). Under the editorship of Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, World Journal of Surgery provides an in-depth, international forum for the most authoritative information on major clinical problems in the fields of clinical and experimental surgery, surgical education, and socioeconomic aspects of surgical care. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished surgeons from across the world who make up the Editorial Board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信