Textbook outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients: age-stratified analysis and predictive factors.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
F Mocchegiani, A Benedetti Cacciaguerra, T Wakabayashi, F Valeriani, P Vincenzi, F Gaudenzi, D Nicolini, G Wakabayashi, M Vivarelli
{"title":"Textbook outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients: age-stratified analysis and predictive factors.","authors":"F Mocchegiani, A Benedetti Cacciaguerra, T Wakabayashi, F Valeriani, P Vincenzi, F Gaudenzi, D Nicolini, G Wakabayashi, M Vivarelli","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02130-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite advancements in pancreatic surgery, managing elderly patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains challenging. Textbook Outcome (TO) serves as a benchmark for surgical success, but its relevance in elderly patients has not been well explored. This study aims to evaluate TO in elderly patients undergoing PD and identify predictors of TO failure. A retrospective analysis was conducted on elderly patients (≥ 70 years) who underwent PD between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2023 in two international HPB centers. TO achievement rates were assessed and stratified by age groups (70-74, 75-79, ≥ 80). Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for TO failure. Of 222 patients, 54.5% achieved TO after PD. TO rates decreased with age, with only 35.0% of octogenarians achieving TO, compared to 57.1% in those aged 70-74. Multivariate analysis revealed that age ≥ 80, an ASA score ≥ 2, and histopathologic types other than pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma or distal cholangiocarcinoma were significant risk factors for failing to achieve TO. Nearly half of elderly patients achieved TO, with a lower likelihood in older age groups, particularly among octogenarians. Higher ASA scores were also associated with lower TO achievement. These findings underscore the importance of a comprehensive preoperative assessment, considering age, to optimize surgical outcomes in elderly patients undergoing PD.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02130-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite advancements in pancreatic surgery, managing elderly patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains challenging. Textbook Outcome (TO) serves as a benchmark for surgical success, but its relevance in elderly patients has not been well explored. This study aims to evaluate TO in elderly patients undergoing PD and identify predictors of TO failure. A retrospective analysis was conducted on elderly patients (≥ 70 years) who underwent PD between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2023 in two international HPB centers. TO achievement rates were assessed and stratified by age groups (70-74, 75-79, ≥ 80). Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for TO failure. Of 222 patients, 54.5% achieved TO after PD. TO rates decreased with age, with only 35.0% of octogenarians achieving TO, compared to 57.1% in those aged 70-74. Multivariate analysis revealed that age ≥ 80, an ASA score ≥ 2, and histopathologic types other than pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma or distal cholangiocarcinoma were significant risk factors for failing to achieve TO. Nearly half of elderly patients achieved TO, with a lower likelihood in older age groups, particularly among octogenarians. Higher ASA scores were also associated with lower TO achievement. These findings underscore the importance of a comprehensive preoperative assessment, considering age, to optimize surgical outcomes in elderly patients undergoing PD.

老年患者胰十二指肠切除术后的教科书结局:年龄分层分析和预测因素。
尽管胰腺手术取得了进步,但管理接受胰十二指肠切除术(PD)的老年患者仍然具有挑战性。教科书结局(TO)作为手术成功的基准,但其在老年患者中的相关性尚未得到很好的探讨。本研究旨在评估老年PD患者的to,并确定to失败的预测因素。回顾性分析了2017年1月1日至2023年12月31日在两个国际HPB中心接受PD治疗的老年患者(≥70岁)。按年龄组(70-74岁、75-79岁、≥80岁)对TO成功率进行评估和分层。进行单因素和多因素logistic回归分析以确定to失败的危险因素。222例患者中,54.5%的患者在PD后达到了TO。TO率随年龄增长而下降,80多岁的人中只有35.0%达到了TO,而70-74岁的人中有57.1%达到了TO。多因素分析显示,年龄≥80岁、ASA评分≥2分、非胰管腺癌或远端胆管癌的组织病理类型是无法达到to的重要危险因素。近一半的老年患者达到了TO,在老年群体中可能性较低,特别是在80多岁的人群中。较高的ASA分数也与较低的TO成绩相关。这些发现强调了全面的术前评估的重要性,考虑年龄,以优化老年PD患者的手术效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Updates in Surgery
Updates in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future. Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts. Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信