Impact of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy on the Pressure of the Airway System in Humans.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Darío S Villalba, Amelia Matesa, Sabrina Boni, Facundo J Gutiérrez, Roque Moracci, Gustavo A Plotnikow
{"title":"Impact of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy on the Pressure of the Airway System in Humans.","authors":"Darío S Villalba, Amelia Matesa, Sabrina Boni, Facundo J Gutiérrez, Roque Moracci, Gustavo A Plotnikow","doi":"10.1089/respcare.12082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The understanding of how pharyngeal pressure is transmitted to the trachea with high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) implementation and the behavior of tracheal pressure in the presence of mouth leaks remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the impact of HFNC administration on tracheal pressure by comparing measurements taken with open and closed mouth with varying flows. <b>Methods:</b> A crossover study was conducted between March 2019 and June 2023. Subjects age > 18 years, with a tracheostomy and who were in the process of decannulation were included. Tracheal and pharyngeal pressures were measured by using specific devices, with different HFNC flows and mouth conditions. <b>Results:</b> Nine subjects were assessed: 77% women, with an average age of 60.5 years. Tracheal pressure was significantly higher than pharyngeal pressure only in baseline conditions (<i>P</i> = .03). With regard to the rest of the scenarios, there were no significant differences between both pressures. Tracheal pressure was higher than the baseline condition both with an open mouth and a closed mouth (<i>P</i> = .02). The tracheal pressure at 60 L/min with an open mouth was higher than at 40 L/min (<i>P</i> = .042). The median pharyngeal pressure with a closed mouth was higher than with an open mouth, both with 40 and 60 L/min of flow (<i>P</i> = .048 and <i>P</i> < .001, respectively). Pharyngeal pressure at 60 L/min with an open mouth was higher than both baseline condition and at 40 L/min (<i>P</i> = .002 and <i>P</i> = .043, respectively). However, pharyngeal pressure with the closed mouth was significantly higher than with the open mouth both with 40 and 60 L/min of flow (<i>P</i> = .031 and <i>P</i> = .02 respectively). <b>Conclusions:</b> The implementation of HFNC changes airway pressures with values that impact at a tracheal level as flow increases. Our data contribute to the difficult interpretation of the existing interrelation between the flow and its effects on the respiratory system.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":"70 1","pages":"10-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/respcare.12082","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The understanding of how pharyngeal pressure is transmitted to the trachea with high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) implementation and the behavior of tracheal pressure in the presence of mouth leaks remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the impact of HFNC administration on tracheal pressure by comparing measurements taken with open and closed mouth with varying flows. Methods: A crossover study was conducted between March 2019 and June 2023. Subjects age > 18 years, with a tracheostomy and who were in the process of decannulation were included. Tracheal and pharyngeal pressures were measured by using specific devices, with different HFNC flows and mouth conditions. Results: Nine subjects were assessed: 77% women, with an average age of 60.5 years. Tracheal pressure was significantly higher than pharyngeal pressure only in baseline conditions (P = .03). With regard to the rest of the scenarios, there were no significant differences between both pressures. Tracheal pressure was higher than the baseline condition both with an open mouth and a closed mouth (P = .02). The tracheal pressure at 60 L/min with an open mouth was higher than at 40 L/min (P = .042). The median pharyngeal pressure with a closed mouth was higher than with an open mouth, both with 40 and 60 L/min of flow (P = .048 and P < .001, respectively). Pharyngeal pressure at 60 L/min with an open mouth was higher than both baseline condition and at 40 L/min (P = .002 and P = .043, respectively). However, pharyngeal pressure with the closed mouth was significantly higher than with the open mouth both with 40 and 60 L/min of flow (P = .031 and P = .02 respectively). Conclusions: The implementation of HFNC changes airway pressures with values that impact at a tracheal level as flow increases. Our data contribute to the difficult interpretation of the existing interrelation between the flow and its effects on the respiratory system.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiratory care
Respiratory care 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信