Coming to terms with dying: Advance care planning as a conduit between clinicians, patients, and conversations about death and dying - a qualitative interview study.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1177/02692163251318907
Rowena Jane Eason, Lisa Jane Brighton, Jonathan Koffman, Katherine Bristowe
{"title":"Coming to terms with dying: Advance care planning as a conduit between clinicians, patients, and conversations about death and dying - a qualitative interview study.","authors":"Rowena Jane Eason, Lisa Jane Brighton, Jonathan Koffman, Katherine Bristowe","doi":"10.1177/02692163251318907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advance care planning discussions exploring future care and support needs can be beneficial to people with advanced illness. While research has focussed on barriers, outcomes, and completion, little is known about how discussions influence thoughts, feelings, and behaviours.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore experiences of advance care planning for people with incurable life-limiting illnesses, to understand the impact of discussions on individuals, and factors influencing psychological responses.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted. Data were analysed using framework analysis. Reflexive journalling and discussion of coding framework and themes supported rigour.</p><p><strong>Setting/participants: </strong>Twenty purposively sampled adults receiving hospice care, aged 30-93 with cancer (<i>n</i> = 15) and non-cancer (<i>n</i> = 5) diagnoses were interviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Advance care planning elicits multiple complex thoughts, emotions, and behaviours, with responses ranging from the procedural to the profound. Discussions empowered and instilled confidence, promoted openness with relatives, encouraged people to make the most of their time remaining, and sometimes contributed to coming to terms with their mortality. Factors influencing experiences of discussions reflected the complexity and diversity in participants' lives, personalities, and life experiences, with discussions exposing the realities of living with terminal illness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individuals' unique lives and experiences shape their responses to, and the impact of advance care planning on how they think, feel and behave. Advance care planning is not simply a means to document end-of-life care preferences, but can empower and instil confidence in patients, and may form part of the process of coming to terms with mortality, allowing clinicians to shift focus from process-related outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19849,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"425-436"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163251318907","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Advance care planning discussions exploring future care and support needs can be beneficial to people with advanced illness. While research has focussed on barriers, outcomes, and completion, little is known about how discussions influence thoughts, feelings, and behaviours.

Aim: To explore experiences of advance care planning for people with incurable life-limiting illnesses, to understand the impact of discussions on individuals, and factors influencing psychological responses.

Design: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted. Data were analysed using framework analysis. Reflexive journalling and discussion of coding framework and themes supported rigour.

Setting/participants: Twenty purposively sampled adults receiving hospice care, aged 30-93 with cancer (n = 15) and non-cancer (n = 5) diagnoses were interviewed.

Results: Advance care planning elicits multiple complex thoughts, emotions, and behaviours, with responses ranging from the procedural to the profound. Discussions empowered and instilled confidence, promoted openness with relatives, encouraged people to make the most of their time remaining, and sometimes contributed to coming to terms with their mortality. Factors influencing experiences of discussions reflected the complexity and diversity in participants' lives, personalities, and life experiences, with discussions exposing the realities of living with terminal illness.

Conclusion: Individuals' unique lives and experiences shape their responses to, and the impact of advance care planning on how they think, feel and behave. Advance care planning is not simply a means to document end-of-life care preferences, but can empower and instil confidence in patients, and may form part of the process of coming to terms with mortality, allowing clinicians to shift focus from process-related outcomes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative Medicine
Palliative Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
125
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Palliative Medicine is a highly ranked, peer reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to improving knowledge and clinical practice in the palliative care of patients with far advanced disease. This outstanding journal features editorials, original papers, review articles, case reports, correspondence and book reviews. Essential reading for all members of the palliative care team. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信