{"title":"A marine predator relies on both social cues and frequently updated memory to search for prey.","authors":"Julien Collet, Andréa Thiebault, Anne-Sophie Bonnet-Lebrun, Yann Tremblay, Tegan Carpenter-Kling, Danielle Keys, Pierre Pistorius","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2024.2327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Finding scattered resources is a challenge for marine predators, their search strategies shaping in turn their response to global changes. Three types of search strategies are generally considered: random opportunistic search, reliance on conspicuous social cues or long-term individual fidelity to predictably productive areas. More complex strategies, namely intermediate, composite and/or those varying across time and environmental conditions are likely to prevail but are rarely explored. We investigated memory strategies in Cape gannets, a marine predator heavily relying on social cues, and closely related to the northern gannet which shows long-term individual foraging fidelity. Repeat GPS tracks within seasons revealed that two different individuals leaving the colony more than 3 days apart showed random chances to forage in a similar direction, whereas within-individuals, birds persisted in a same direction for longer timescales, reaching random levels only after 10 days, or 9 consecutive trips. This strategy of transient individual preferences within a breeding season was observed in most individuals every year. These results suggest a consistent and complex search strategy mixing social cues and private information updated every few days. Our simple approach can readily be applied to other central place foragers to better understand the evolutionary ecology of search strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":20589,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences","volume":"292 2041","pages":"20242327"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11836699/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2024.2327","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Finding scattered resources is a challenge for marine predators, their search strategies shaping in turn their response to global changes. Three types of search strategies are generally considered: random opportunistic search, reliance on conspicuous social cues or long-term individual fidelity to predictably productive areas. More complex strategies, namely intermediate, composite and/or those varying across time and environmental conditions are likely to prevail but are rarely explored. We investigated memory strategies in Cape gannets, a marine predator heavily relying on social cues, and closely related to the northern gannet which shows long-term individual foraging fidelity. Repeat GPS tracks within seasons revealed that two different individuals leaving the colony more than 3 days apart showed random chances to forage in a similar direction, whereas within-individuals, birds persisted in a same direction for longer timescales, reaching random levels only after 10 days, or 9 consecutive trips. This strategy of transient individual preferences within a breeding season was observed in most individuals every year. These results suggest a consistent and complex search strategy mixing social cues and private information updated every few days. Our simple approach can readily be applied to other central place foragers to better understand the evolutionary ecology of search strategies.
期刊介绍:
Proceedings B is the Royal Society’s flagship biological research journal, accepting original articles and reviews of outstanding scientific importance and broad general interest. The main criteria for acceptance are that a study is novel, and has general significance to biologists. Articles published cover a wide range of areas within the biological sciences, many have relevance to organisms and the environments in which they live. The scope includes, but is not limited to, ecology, evolution, behavior, health and disease epidemiology, neuroscience and cognition, behavioral genetics, development, biomechanics, paleontology, comparative biology, molecular ecology and evolution, and global change biology.