Hassaan Abdel Khalik, Danielle Dagher, Darius Luke Lameire, Eva Gusnowski, Michaela Kolpka, Marie-Eve LeBel, Bogdan A Matache, R Kyle Martin, Mark Sommerfeldt, Ivan Wong, Jarret Woodmass, Moin Khan
{"title":"Management of First-Time Anterior Shoulder Dislocation-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Arthroscopy Association of Canada Position Statement.","authors":"Hassaan Abdel Khalik, Danielle Dagher, Darius Luke Lameire, Eva Gusnowski, Michaela Kolpka, Marie-Eve LeBel, Bogdan A Matache, R Kyle Martin, Mark Sommerfeldt, Ivan Wong, Jarret Woodmass, Moin Khan","doi":"10.1177/23259671251316893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While surgical stabilization is typically recommended for patients with recurrent shoulder instability, the management of first-time shoulder dislocation (FTSD) presents a unique challenge for health care providers.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the efficacy of arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) compared with nonoperative management for FTSDs.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched from inception to December 26, 2023, for comparative studies assessing ABR versus nonoperative management of FTSDs. Outcomes of interest included rates of shoulder redislocation, cumulative shoulder instability (redislocation, subluxation, and/or subjective instability), subsequent shoulder stabilization surgery, return-to-sport rates, and patient-reported outcomes (Western Ontario Shoulder Instability [WOSI] score and Rowe score). Meta-analyses were performed on outcomes reported across a minimum of 3 comparative studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven comparative studies with 694 patients (695 shoulders) were included in the final analysis. Patient demographics were comparable across arthroscopic stabilization (367 shoulders) and nonoperative management (328 shoulders) groups with a mean age of 21.6 ± 2.5 years across all studies, and 13.7% ± 13.6% of patients being female. The mean follow-up across all studies was 54.2 ± 28.5 months, with a mean loss to follow-up of 8.1% ± 10.3%. Meta-analyses demonstrated a reduction in the odds of cumulative instability in favor of the ABR group (odds ratio [OR], 0.04 [95% CI, 0.02 to 0.08]; <i>P</i> < .01), as well as reductions in the odds of shoulder redislocation (OR, 0.06 [95% CI, 0.02 to 0.17]; <i>P</i> < .01) and subsequent stabilization surgery (OR, 0.07 [95% CI, 0.03 to 0.14]; <i>P</i> < .01) in favor of ABR. Compared with the nonoperative group, patients in the ABR group were 3.87 times more likely to return to sport at the preoperative or higher level (OR, 3.87 [95% CI, 1.57 to 9.52]; <i>P</i> < .01). No differences were found across postoperative WOSI scores (mean difference, 8.08 [95% CI, -1.54 to 17.69]; <i>P</i> = .10). Subgroup analyses demonstrated similar outcomes between randomized controlled trials and observational studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early ABR of first-time anterior shoulder dislocations consistently demonstrated decreased subsequent rates of cumulative instability events, shoulder redislocations, and revision surgeries relative to nonoperative management.</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"13 2","pages":"23259671251316893"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11833906/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671251316893","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: While surgical stabilization is typically recommended for patients with recurrent shoulder instability, the management of first-time shoulder dislocation (FTSD) presents a unique challenge for health care providers.
Purpose: To assess the efficacy of arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) compared with nonoperative management for FTSDs.
Study design: Review.
Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched from inception to December 26, 2023, for comparative studies assessing ABR versus nonoperative management of FTSDs. Outcomes of interest included rates of shoulder redislocation, cumulative shoulder instability (redislocation, subluxation, and/or subjective instability), subsequent shoulder stabilization surgery, return-to-sport rates, and patient-reported outcomes (Western Ontario Shoulder Instability [WOSI] score and Rowe score). Meta-analyses were performed on outcomes reported across a minimum of 3 comparative studies.
Results: Eleven comparative studies with 694 patients (695 shoulders) were included in the final analysis. Patient demographics were comparable across arthroscopic stabilization (367 shoulders) and nonoperative management (328 shoulders) groups with a mean age of 21.6 ± 2.5 years across all studies, and 13.7% ± 13.6% of patients being female. The mean follow-up across all studies was 54.2 ± 28.5 months, with a mean loss to follow-up of 8.1% ± 10.3%. Meta-analyses demonstrated a reduction in the odds of cumulative instability in favor of the ABR group (odds ratio [OR], 0.04 [95% CI, 0.02 to 0.08]; P < .01), as well as reductions in the odds of shoulder redislocation (OR, 0.06 [95% CI, 0.02 to 0.17]; P < .01) and subsequent stabilization surgery (OR, 0.07 [95% CI, 0.03 to 0.14]; P < .01) in favor of ABR. Compared with the nonoperative group, patients in the ABR group were 3.87 times more likely to return to sport at the preoperative or higher level (OR, 3.87 [95% CI, 1.57 to 9.52]; P < .01). No differences were found across postoperative WOSI scores (mean difference, 8.08 [95% CI, -1.54 to 17.69]; P = .10). Subgroup analyses demonstrated similar outcomes between randomized controlled trials and observational studies.
Conclusion: Early ABR of first-time anterior shoulder dislocations consistently demonstrated decreased subsequent rates of cumulative instability events, shoulder redislocations, and revision surgeries relative to nonoperative management.
期刊介绍:
The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty.
Topics include original research in the areas of:
-Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries
-Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot)
-Relevant translational research
-Sports traumatology/epidemiology
-Knee and shoulder arthroplasty
The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).