Management of First-Time Anterior Shoulder Dislocation-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Arthroscopy Association of Canada Position Statement.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-06 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671251316893
Hassaan Abdel Khalik, Danielle Dagher, Darius Luke Lameire, Eva Gusnowski, Michaela Kolpka, Marie-Eve LeBel, Bogdan A Matache, R Kyle Martin, Mark Sommerfeldt, Ivan Wong, Jarret Woodmass, Moin Khan
{"title":"Management of First-Time Anterior Shoulder Dislocation-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Arthroscopy Association of Canada Position Statement.","authors":"Hassaan Abdel Khalik, Danielle Dagher, Darius Luke Lameire, Eva Gusnowski, Michaela Kolpka, Marie-Eve LeBel, Bogdan A Matache, R Kyle Martin, Mark Sommerfeldt, Ivan Wong, Jarret Woodmass, Moin Khan","doi":"10.1177/23259671251316893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While surgical stabilization is typically recommended for patients with recurrent shoulder instability, the management of first-time shoulder dislocation (FTSD) presents a unique challenge for health care providers.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the efficacy of arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) compared with nonoperative management for FTSDs.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched from inception to December 26, 2023, for comparative studies assessing ABR versus nonoperative management of FTSDs. Outcomes of interest included rates of shoulder redislocation, cumulative shoulder instability (redislocation, subluxation, and/or subjective instability), subsequent shoulder stabilization surgery, return-to-sport rates, and patient-reported outcomes (Western Ontario Shoulder Instability [WOSI] score and Rowe score). Meta-analyses were performed on outcomes reported across a minimum of 3 comparative studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven comparative studies with 694 patients (695 shoulders) were included in the final analysis. Patient demographics were comparable across arthroscopic stabilization (367 shoulders) and nonoperative management (328 shoulders) groups with a mean age of 21.6 ± 2.5 years across all studies, and 13.7% ± 13.6% of patients being female. The mean follow-up across all studies was 54.2 ± 28.5 months, with a mean loss to follow-up of 8.1% ± 10.3%. Meta-analyses demonstrated a reduction in the odds of cumulative instability in favor of the ABR group (odds ratio [OR], 0.04 [95% CI, 0.02 to 0.08]; <i>P</i> < .01), as well as reductions in the odds of shoulder redislocation (OR, 0.06 [95% CI, 0.02 to 0.17]; <i>P</i> < .01) and subsequent stabilization surgery (OR, 0.07 [95% CI, 0.03 to 0.14]; <i>P</i> < .01) in favor of ABR. Compared with the nonoperative group, patients in the ABR group were 3.87 times more likely to return to sport at the preoperative or higher level (OR, 3.87 [95% CI, 1.57 to 9.52]; <i>P</i> < .01). No differences were found across postoperative WOSI scores (mean difference, 8.08 [95% CI, -1.54 to 17.69]; <i>P</i> = .10). Subgroup analyses demonstrated similar outcomes between randomized controlled trials and observational studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early ABR of first-time anterior shoulder dislocations consistently demonstrated decreased subsequent rates of cumulative instability events, shoulder redislocations, and revision surgeries relative to nonoperative management.</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"13 2","pages":"23259671251316893"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11833906/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671251316893","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While surgical stabilization is typically recommended for patients with recurrent shoulder instability, the management of first-time shoulder dislocation (FTSD) presents a unique challenge for health care providers.

Purpose: To assess the efficacy of arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) compared with nonoperative management for FTSDs.

Study design: Review.

Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched from inception to December 26, 2023, for comparative studies assessing ABR versus nonoperative management of FTSDs. Outcomes of interest included rates of shoulder redislocation, cumulative shoulder instability (redislocation, subluxation, and/or subjective instability), subsequent shoulder stabilization surgery, return-to-sport rates, and patient-reported outcomes (Western Ontario Shoulder Instability [WOSI] score and Rowe score). Meta-analyses were performed on outcomes reported across a minimum of 3 comparative studies.

Results: Eleven comparative studies with 694 patients (695 shoulders) were included in the final analysis. Patient demographics were comparable across arthroscopic stabilization (367 shoulders) and nonoperative management (328 shoulders) groups with a mean age of 21.6 ± 2.5 years across all studies, and 13.7% ± 13.6% of patients being female. The mean follow-up across all studies was 54.2 ± 28.5 months, with a mean loss to follow-up of 8.1% ± 10.3%. Meta-analyses demonstrated a reduction in the odds of cumulative instability in favor of the ABR group (odds ratio [OR], 0.04 [95% CI, 0.02 to 0.08]; P < .01), as well as reductions in the odds of shoulder redislocation (OR, 0.06 [95% CI, 0.02 to 0.17]; P < .01) and subsequent stabilization surgery (OR, 0.07 [95% CI, 0.03 to 0.14]; P < .01) in favor of ABR. Compared with the nonoperative group, patients in the ABR group were 3.87 times more likely to return to sport at the preoperative or higher level (OR, 3.87 [95% CI, 1.57 to 9.52]; P < .01). No differences were found across postoperative WOSI scores (mean difference, 8.08 [95% CI, -1.54 to 17.69]; P = .10). Subgroup analyses demonstrated similar outcomes between randomized controlled trials and observational studies.

Conclusion: Early ABR of first-time anterior shoulder dislocations consistently demonstrated decreased subsequent rates of cumulative instability events, shoulder redislocations, and revision surgeries relative to nonoperative management.

首次肩关节前脱位的治疗——系统回顾和荟萃分析:加拿大关节镜协会立场声明。
背景:虽然手术稳定通常被推荐用于复发性肩关节不稳患者,但首次肩关节脱位(FTSD)的治疗对医疗保健提供者来说是一个独特的挑战。目的:比较关节镜下Bankart修复(ABR)与非手术治疗FTSDs的疗效。研究设计:回顾。方法:检索MEDLINE、EMBASE和CENTRAL数据库,从创建到2023年12月26日,比较评估ABR与非手术治疗FTSDs的研究。研究结果包括肩关节再脱位率、累积肩关节不稳定性(再脱位、半脱位和/或主观不稳定性)、随后的肩关节稳定手术、恢复运动率和患者报告的结果(西安大略肩关节不稳定性[WOSI]评分和Rowe评分)。对至少3个比较研究报告的结果进行荟萃分析。结果:最终分析纳入了11项比较研究,涉及694例患者(695例肩关节)。关节镜稳定组(367个肩关节)和非手术治疗组(328个肩关节)的患者人口统计数据具有可比性,所有研究的平均年龄为21.6±2.5岁,13.7%±13.6%的患者为女性。所有研究的平均随访时间为54.2±28.5个月,平均随访损失为8.1%±10.3%。荟萃分析显示,ABR组累积不稳定性的几率降低(优势比[OR], 0.04 [95% CI, 0.02至0.08];P < 0.01),肩关节再脱位的几率降低(OR, 0.06 [95% CI, 0.02 ~ 0.17];P < 0.01)和随后的稳定手术(OR, 0.07 [95% CI, 0.03 ~ 0.14];P < 0.01)有利于ABR。与非手术组相比,ABR组患者恢复到术前或更高水平的可能性是非手术组的3.87倍(or, 3.87 [95% CI, 1.57至9.52];P < 0.01)。术后WOSI评分无差异(平均差异为8.08 [95% CI, -1.54 ~ 17.69];P = .10)。亚组分析表明,随机对照试验和观察性研究的结果相似。结论:与非手术治疗相比,首次肩关节前脱位的早期ABR持续显示累积不稳定事件、肩关节再脱位和翻修手术的发生率降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信