Arietje J L Zandijk, Bernadet T Santema, Friso D J Inkelaar, Martje H L van der Wal, Janke Warink-Riemersma, Michiel Rienstra, Adriaan A Voors
{"title":"Up-titration of medication in patients with new-onset heart failure with and without atrial fibrillation.","authors":"Arietje J L Zandijk, Bernadet T Santema, Friso D J Inkelaar, Martje H L van der Wal, Janke Warink-Riemersma, Michiel Rienstra, Adriaan A Voors","doi":"10.1002/ehf2.15188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Differences in guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) and clinical outcomes have been observed between heart failure (HF) patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) versus those in sinus rhythm. This study evaluated the effects of up-titration of HF therapies, consisting of beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEis)/angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), in patients with new-onset HF with and without AF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among 607 patients with new-onset HF (<3 months) from a specialized nurse-led HF clinic in the Netherlands, 187 (31%) patients had AF, and 420 (69%) patients were in sinus rhythm at baseline electrocardiogram. After an up-titration period of 9 months, achieved doses and reasons for not reaching target doses were documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with AF were older, less likely to have ischaemic heart disease and had higher baseline N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide levels (all P < 0.05). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at baseline was similar between patients with AF and those in sinus rhythm (37% vs. 36%, P = 0.453). Prescription of GDMT was comparable between patients with AF and those in sinus rhythm, except for a lower ACEi/ARB prescription and higher use of diuretics in patients with AF (79% vs. 86%; P = 0.038; 86% vs. 59%, P < 0.001, respectively, compared with sinus rhythm). Up-titration to guideline-recommended target doses of beta-blocker, ACEi/ARB and MRA therapy was similar between patients with and without AF (31% vs. 24%, P = 0.096; 32% vs. 40%, P = 0.098; 23.7% vs. 30.5%, P = 0.125, respectively). Reasons for not further up-titrating to recommended target doses were consistent across patients with AF and sinus rhythm. LVEF improvement of ≥5% and ≥10% after up-titration was more common in patients with AF than those in sinus rhythm (67% vs. 53%, P = 0.017; 48% vs. 36%, P = 0.043). Achieving target doses of ACEi/ARB and MRA therapies was associated with lower mortality and HF rehospitalization rates at 3 years in both patients with AF and those in sinus rhythm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with new-onset HF, up-titration to recommended doses of GDMT was similar in patients with and without AF, but was associated with a greater improvement in LVEF in patients with AF.</p>","PeriodicalId":11864,"journal":{"name":"ESC Heart Failure","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESC Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.15188","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: Differences in guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) and clinical outcomes have been observed between heart failure (HF) patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) versus those in sinus rhythm. This study evaluated the effects of up-titration of HF therapies, consisting of beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEis)/angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), in patients with new-onset HF with and without AF.
Methods: Among 607 patients with new-onset HF (<3 months) from a specialized nurse-led HF clinic in the Netherlands, 187 (31%) patients had AF, and 420 (69%) patients were in sinus rhythm at baseline electrocardiogram. After an up-titration period of 9 months, achieved doses and reasons for not reaching target doses were documented.
Results: Patients with AF were older, less likely to have ischaemic heart disease and had higher baseline N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide levels (all P < 0.05). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at baseline was similar between patients with AF and those in sinus rhythm (37% vs. 36%, P = 0.453). Prescription of GDMT was comparable between patients with AF and those in sinus rhythm, except for a lower ACEi/ARB prescription and higher use of diuretics in patients with AF (79% vs. 86%; P = 0.038; 86% vs. 59%, P < 0.001, respectively, compared with sinus rhythm). Up-titration to guideline-recommended target doses of beta-blocker, ACEi/ARB and MRA therapy was similar between patients with and without AF (31% vs. 24%, P = 0.096; 32% vs. 40%, P = 0.098; 23.7% vs. 30.5%, P = 0.125, respectively). Reasons for not further up-titrating to recommended target doses were consistent across patients with AF and sinus rhythm. LVEF improvement of ≥5% and ≥10% after up-titration was more common in patients with AF than those in sinus rhythm (67% vs. 53%, P = 0.017; 48% vs. 36%, P = 0.043). Achieving target doses of ACEi/ARB and MRA therapies was associated with lower mortality and HF rehospitalization rates at 3 years in both patients with AF and those in sinus rhythm.
Conclusions: In patients with new-onset HF, up-titration to recommended doses of GDMT was similar in patients with and without AF, but was associated with a greater improvement in LVEF in patients with AF.
期刊介绍:
ESC Heart Failure is the open access journal of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology dedicated to the advancement of knowledge in the field of heart failure. The journal aims to improve the understanding, prevention, investigation and treatment of heart failure. Molecular and cellular biology, pathology, physiology, electrophysiology, pharmacology, as well as the clinical, social and population sciences all form part of the discipline that is heart failure. Accordingly, submission of manuscripts on basic, translational, clinical and population sciences is invited. Original contributions on nursing, care of the elderly, primary care, health economics and other specialist fields related to heart failure are also welcome, as are case reports that highlight interesting aspects of heart failure care and treatment.