Dose rate correction of a diode array for universal wedge field dosimetric verification.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Linyi Shen, Mengyang Li, Guiyuan Li, Xinyuan Chen, Shouping Xu, Jianrong Dai, Yuan Tian
{"title":"Dose rate correction of a diode array for universal wedge field dosimetric verification.","authors":"Linyi Shen, Mengyang Li, Guiyuan Li, Xinyuan Chen, Shouping Xu, Jianrong Dai, Yuan Tian","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To study the performance of MapCHECK 3 (MC3) in measuring universal wedge fields and propose a dose rate correction strategy to improve MC3 measurement accuracy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Universal wedge fields with different wedge angles and field sizes were measured at different depths using MC3. Considering the more prominent dose rate dependence of type 4 diodes equipped by MC3, a program was developed to automatically correct the measurements based on the instantaneous dose rate (IDR) correction curve. Central axis (CAX) doses and off-axis doses along the wedge direction, with and without the correction, were compared with those measured by an ion chamber under the same condition. Measurements using MC3 with and without correction were also compared with the planned doses calculated by the treatment planning system (TPS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>If MC3 was used for universal wedge field measurement with the dose calibration factor (DCF) derived from a reference open field, an error of up to -2.4% would be introduced into the CAX dose. Other factors (field size and measurement depth) would also affect the accuracy of measurement when they differed from the absolute dose calibration and the maximum error was up to -2.9%. While greater errors were observed in the off-axis doses at the heel side of the wedge compared to the toe side due to the greater effective thickness of the wedge inserted into the beam. After dose rate correction, the deviations in the CAX dose were reduced to within ± 1.5%. The average gamma pass rate was also improved to over 99.5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Because of the more prominent dose rate dependence of type 4 diodes, MC3 is not suitable for universal wedge field measurement using the methodology for open field measurement. The correction strategy proposed in this study is convenient and can improve the accuracy of universal wedge field measurement using MC3.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e70050"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70050","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To study the performance of MapCHECK 3 (MC3) in measuring universal wedge fields and propose a dose rate correction strategy to improve MC3 measurement accuracy.

Materials and methods: Universal wedge fields with different wedge angles and field sizes were measured at different depths using MC3. Considering the more prominent dose rate dependence of type 4 diodes equipped by MC3, a program was developed to automatically correct the measurements based on the instantaneous dose rate (IDR) correction curve. Central axis (CAX) doses and off-axis doses along the wedge direction, with and without the correction, were compared with those measured by an ion chamber under the same condition. Measurements using MC3 with and without correction were also compared with the planned doses calculated by the treatment planning system (TPS).

Results: If MC3 was used for universal wedge field measurement with the dose calibration factor (DCF) derived from a reference open field, an error of up to -2.4% would be introduced into the CAX dose. Other factors (field size and measurement depth) would also affect the accuracy of measurement when they differed from the absolute dose calibration and the maximum error was up to -2.9%. While greater errors were observed in the off-axis doses at the heel side of the wedge compared to the toe side due to the greater effective thickness of the wedge inserted into the beam. After dose rate correction, the deviations in the CAX dose were reduced to within ± 1.5%. The average gamma pass rate was also improved to over 99.5%.

Conclusion: Because of the more prominent dose rate dependence of type 4 diodes, MC3 is not suitable for universal wedge field measurement using the methodology for open field measurement. The correction strategy proposed in this study is convenient and can improve the accuracy of universal wedge field measurement using MC3.

通用楔形场剂量计检定用二极管阵列的剂量率校正。
目的:研究MapCHECK 3 (MC3)测量通用楔形场的性能,提出一种剂量率校正策略以提高MC3的测量精度。材料和方法:采用MC3在不同深度测量不同楔角和场尺寸的通用楔场。考虑到MC3配备的4型二极管的剂量率依赖性更突出,开发了基于瞬时剂量率(IDR)校正曲线的自动校正程序。在相同条件下,比较了有和没有校正的沿楔形方向的中心轴(CAX)和离轴剂量与离子室测量的剂量。还将经校正和未经校正的MC3测量值与治疗计划系统(TPS)计算的计划剂量进行比较。结果:如果使用MC3进行通用楔形场测量,且剂量校准因子(DCF)来自参考开场,则CAX剂量误差可达-2.4%。其他因素(视场大小和测量深度)与绝对剂量校准存在差异时,也会影响测量精度,最大误差可达-2.9%。由于楔形插入光束的有效厚度更大,因此在楔形脚跟侧与脚趾侧相比,在离轴剂量中观察到更大的误差。经剂量率校正后,CAX剂量偏差降至±1.5%以内。平均伽马通过率也提高到99.5%以上。结论:由于4型二极管的剂量率依赖性较突出,MC3不适合采用开场测量方法进行通用楔形场测量。本文提出的修正策略方便,可提高MC3万能楔场测量的精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信